United States: FTC Challenge To Advocate Northshore Merger Continues To Gain Momentum With Addition Of Illinois Attorney General

Following the Federal Trade Commission's ("FTC") move to block the proposed merger between two of Chicago's largest health systems—Downers Grove based Advocate Health Care ("Advocate") and Evanston based NorthShore University HealthSystem ("NorthShore")—Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan announced her office would be joining the FTC in seeking to block the proposed merger. Initially viewed as the start of a new wave of hospital affiliations in the Chicago market, this proposed merger could actually dampen further Chicago area hospital affiliations as it signals increased regulatory scrutiny.

Proposed Affiliation

In September 2014, Advocate and NorthShore entered into an affiliation agreement, pursuant to which Advocate would change its name to Advocate NorthShore Health Partners and become the sole corporate member of NorthShore. NorthShore would bring a strong research base to the table, as well as a sizeable employed physician group of nearly 800 physicians and specialists. Likewise, Advocate has a nationally recognized clinical integration program with more than 4,000 integrated physicians.

The proposed merger would comprise 17 hospitals—13 from Advocate and 4 from NorthShore—and would make it the nation's 11th largest not for profit health care system. The combined system is expected to generate over $7 billion in annual revenues.

Advocate and NorthShore originally planned to consummate the proposed merger in early 2015; however, in April 2015, the FTC requested additional information and time to review the proposed merger. The Illinois Health Facilities and Services Review Board ("IHFSRB"), the state board responsible for approving major changes, including changes in ownership, to Illinois health care facilities, approved the merger in December 2014. The IHFSRB's approval is contingent on the merger being completed within 24 months of such approval.

FTC and Illinois Attorney General Challenge

In December 2015, the FTC issued an administrative complaint to Advocate and NorthShore alleging unfair competition. Shortly thereafter, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan announced her office would be joining the FTC in seeking to block the proposed merger. The FTC and Attorney General Madigan then proceeded to jointly file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prevent the proposed merger from going forward until the FTC completes a full antitrust administrative proceeding.

In its administrative complaint, the FTC alleged the proposed merger would substantially lessen competition and cause significant harm to consumers through increased health care costs and a diminished incentive to increase health service offerings and quality improvements. In support of its challenge, the FTC defined the relevant geographic market as northern Cook County and southern Lake County, of which the combined system would control 55% of the general acute care inpatient hospital service market. The FTC went on to explain that it found the proposed merger's alleged efficiencies, including quality improvements, cost savings and the ability for the systems to participate in a low price, ultra narrow network insurance product, to be neither substantiated nor merger specific.

Advocate NorthShore Claims FTC "Gerrymandering" Analysis

In response to the FTC challenge, NorthShore accused the FTC of gerrymandering the boundaries of the health systems' relevant geographic markets, as well as incorrectly excluding outpatient services from the antitrust analysis, in an attempt to support the FTC's challenge of the proposed merger. NorthShore believes the proposed merger will result in only a combined 22% market share of inpatient beds in its suggested six county Chicago market, as opposed to the FTC's 55% market share estimate based on portions of only two counties.

Furthermore, NorthShore alleges that even within the FTC's limited geographic market, the FTC improperly excludes select market competitors, such as Presence St. Francis Hospital in Evanston and Vista Medical Center West in Waukegan. Given the proximity of these excluded hospitals to NorthShore's own Evanston hospital, as well as to other competitors included in the FTC's analysis, NorthShore claims these exclusions are evidence of the FTC gerrymandering the analysis to support its challenge. The resolution of this discrepancy will likely hinge on expert econometrics testimony to define the geographic market; however, Advocate and NorthShore likely have an uphill battle since long standing FTC policy is to define markets as narrowly as possible. Advocate and NorthShore have expressed a continued commitment to the proposed merger and plan to vigorously oppose the FTC challenge. The trial for the FTC's injunction request is scheduled for April 6, 2016. The FTC administrative review hearing is scheduled for May 24, 2016.

Geographic Market and Efficiency Defenses

To prevail, Advocate and NorthShore will need to convince the court that the Chicago market is much larger than the FTC portrays. Alternatively, Advocate and NorthShore may try to leverage the fragmented nature of the Chicago health care market—95 hospitals within a six-county area—and show that even with an increase in a neighborhood specific market share, the abundance of nearby health care options means the merger will have little to no competitive effect on the overall market.

In addition to arguing in favor of a broader geographic market, Advocate and NorthShore will also want to show that the affiliation would produce substantiated, merger-specific efficiencies sufficient to overcome any potential harm to competition. In its complaint, the FTC alleges the efficiencies originally proposed by the systems were nothing more than "speculative and unsubstantiated." To succeed here, the systems will need to prove that the efficiencies they put forward are attributable to the merger and cannot otherwise be achieved in a practical, more competitive way (e.g., unilateral expansion or collaborations). Given the recent expansion of both systems, however, this may be an uphill battle.

Historically, the courts have been unwilling to accept efficiency defenses such as improved purchasing power, increased discounts or better geographic coverage when both parties to the merger are already rapidly expanding and such efficiencies could be achieved through continued internal expansion. One exception to this, however, has been when a system has entered into an agreement requiring the system to pass on to the community the substantial cost savings that would be achieved. Advocate and NorthShore attempted to take a similar approach by offering to agree not to raise prices significantly if they merged; however, federal regulators were not interested in the offer. The courts have also demonstrated an unwillingness to accept efficiency claims based on reducing overcapacity where capacity could be reduced even without a merger. In framing their efficiency defenses, Advocate and NorthShore must be cautious that the efficiencies are not ultimately produced through anticompetitive reductions in output, service or other competitively significant categories, such as system innovation.

The ultimate deciding factor in this point may be whether Advocate and NorthShore adequately prepared for this challenge in the run-up to the transaction. As Reinhart Health Care attorney Tracey Klein explains, "a key question is going to be whether Advocate and NorthShore developed and supported their alleged efficiencies before deciding to enter into the transaction, or instead, merely in response to the FTC's challenge." "Efficiency claims that are either undeveloped before, or even that first arise following an FTC complaint often do little good for those defending the legality of the merger and instead only raise more skepticism and undermine credibility with enforcement officials and the court," explains Attorney Klein. Reinhart Litigation attorney Scott Hansen further explains, "if the parties do not develop and support their efficiency arguments from the first stages of the transaction, internal communications provided to the FTC are eventually going to contradict the efficiency defense afterthoughts."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Jennifer L. Naeger
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions