United States: Grebow v. Mercury Insurance Co.

(Preventative Measures Not Covered Under Homeowners Insurance Policy)

In Grebow v. Mercury Insurance Company, 241 Cal. App. 4th 564 (2015), the California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Mercury Insurance Company ("Mercury"), finding Arthur and Helen Grebows' claim for expenditures to prevent a collapse (an insurable loss) was not covered by the terms of their homeowners policy.

The Grebows purchased a superior property homeowners policy from Mercury for their residence located in Tarzana, California. The Grebows asked a general contractor to inspect the rear deck because of recurring watermarks. The contractor found severe decay in the steel beams that supported the second floor of the house, and reported that the beams and poles could no longer support the upper portion of the house, a large portion of which would fall. Upon inspection, a structural engineer agreed with the general contractor's findings. The engineer also opined the failure of the poles and beams was caused by concealed decay and corrosion. The Grebows were advised not to enter the top portion of their home until repair work was completed. The Grebows authorized the purchase of shoring material, which was installed the next day, and entered into a construction contract for the repairs. Nearly a month later, the Grebows orally notified Mercury of their claim, which they submitted in writing the following day. Mercury investigated and, approximately four months after the Grebows submitted their claim, denied the claim. The Grebows had paid approximately $91,000 to remediate their home.

The Grebows filed an action against Mercury, asserting claims of breach of contract and tortious breach of insurance contract. The Grebows filed a motion for summary adjudication regarding coverage. Mercury filed a motion for summary judgment that there was no coverage as a matter of law so Mercury was not obligated to reimburse the Grebows. The trial court denied the Grebows' motion, but granted Mercury's. The trial court then denied the Grebows' motion for new trial, and the Grebows appealed the trial court's decisions as to all three motions.

In ruling on the Grebows' appeal, the Court of Appeal noted that the general rules of contract interpretation apply to insurance disputes:

The California Supreme Court has established the following rules of interpretation: "Interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law and follows the general rules of contract interpretation. [Citation.] 'The fundamental rules of contract interpretation are based on the premise that the interpretation of a contract must give effect to the "mutual intention" of the parties. "Under statutory rules of contract interpretation, the mutual intention of the parties at the time the contract is formed governs interpretation. (Civ. Code, § 1636.) Such intent is to be inferred, if possible, solely from the written provisions of the contract. (Id., § 1639.) The 'clear and explicit' meaning of these provisions, interpreted in their 'ordinary and popular sense,' unless 'used by the parties in a technical sense or a special meaning is given to them by usage' (id., § 1644), controls judicial interpretation ... (id., § 1638.)"'" (MacKinnon v. Truck Ins. Exchange (2003) 31 Cal.4th 635, 647–648 [3 Cal. Rptr. 3d 228, 73 P.3d 1205] (MacKinnon).) Although "'"insurance contracts have special features, they are still contracts to which the ordinary rules of contractual interpretation apply." [Citation.]'" (Rosen v. State Farm General Ins. Co. (2003) 30 Cal.4th 1070, 1074 [135 Cal. Rptr. 2d 361, 70 P.3d 351] (Rosen).) "'If possible, we infer th[e] intent solely from the written provisions of the insurance policy. [Citation.] If the policy language "is clear and explicit, it governs." [Citation.]' [Citation.]" (Id. at pp. 1074–1075.)

The Court of Appeal first considered whether the Grebows' claim would be covered as "collapse," defined under the terms of the policy as "sudden and complete breaking down or falling in or crumbling into pieces or into a heap of rubble or into a flattened mass" which does not include "settling, cracking, shrinking, bulging, expansion, sagging or bowing, nor a substantial impairment of the structural integrity of a structure or building, not a condition of imminent danger of collapse or a structure or building." The Grebows argued the deck was part of the building, and that the detachment of certain elements of the deck constituted a collapse, caused by hidden decay. Mercury asserted the plain language of the policy is inconsistent with this claim. The Court pointed to a split in authority over the scope of collapse coverage: while some courts require a complete falling down or flattening to rubble, others find a collapse when the damage has materially impaired the basic structure or integrity of the building. The policy language required the former (complete falling down) and excluded the latter (impairment), rendering the collapse clause unambiguous. The Grebows did not experience a complete falling down, as required by the terms of the policy, and various other exclusions (i.e. for corrosion, wear and tear, deterioration, and rust) also applied, precluding a finding that the Grebows' claim was covered as a collapse under the terms of the policy.

Second, the Court of Appeal considered whether the Grebows' claim was covered as mitigation. In an aside, the Court noted that, while Mercury did not specifically make the argument, even if there was a collapse, the exclusion would have precluded coverage. The Grebows argued the mitigation clause of the policy entitled them to reimbursement of their costs as mitigation. Mercury argued the clause only applied after a loss occurs, so the Grebows' claim was not one for mitigation. The Court again found this clause to be unambiguous: the duty to mitigate arises after a loss to which the insurance applies. Because the only possible loss would be collapse, which did not occur as defined by the policy, the Grebows' claim was not recoverable as mitigation. The Court further determined that to read the policy as argued by the Grebows would make all maintenance calculated to prevent what would ultimately be an insurable loss reimbursable by the insurer, and the parties could not have intended to convert the homeowners insurance policy into a maintenance agreement.

The Grebows also argued Mercury had an obligation to reimburse them based on "sue and labor" clauses. However, a "sue and labor" clause "applies when a party takes steps to prevent an imminent loss that would be covered it if occurred, such as a collapse." Additionally, the mitigation clause in the policy is not the same as a "sue and labor" clause – the mitigation clause only applies after a loss. Next the Grebows contended they had a common law duty to prevent an imminent insurance loss, and Mercury had a corresponding duty to reimburse for such costs. The Court distinguished the case law on which the Grebows relied – the first as dictum, the second as relying on a "sue and labor" clause not present in the policy. After considering the conflicting authorities on this subject generally, the Court concluded: "absent a provision that provides for reimbursement, the insurer has no obligation to reimburse an insured for costs to prevent an imminent insurable occurrence from occurring." The Court then declined to consider such a provision as an implied term of the policy:

To imply an obligation to reimburse an insured for preventive acts would result in uncertainty as to when such an obligation can be enforced. For example, if an insured has a hole in his or her roof, should he or she be able to obtain reimbursement for preventing water damage by fixing the roof? If a tree is leaning ominously toward a house, is the cost of removing the tree reimbursable? All maintenance is geared towards preventing an insurable loss. To have to litigate the point at which maintenance becomes a reasonable step to prevent an imminent insurable loss is an undesirable way to deal with insurance coverage. Moreover, if insurers are responsible for such reimbursement, they will either raise the cost of insurance or attempt to insert even more explicit clauses precluding such exposure.

The Court also rejected the use of quasi-contract remedies (i.e. unjust enrichment and restitution) here because of the existence of the insurance contract.

Third, the Court of Appeals considered the Grebows' argument that Mercury was estopped from denying coverage due to its knowledge of ongoing repairs and delay in communicating its denial. The Court distinguished the Grebows' cited case law, Reliance Ins. Co. v. The Escapade, 280 F.2d 482 (5th Cir. 1960), wherein the insurer "at least implied there would be coverage if the insured mitigated losses and the insured relied upon the insurance agent's requirement of preventive work." The Court found Reliance not applicable: "Mercury did not demand anything of the Grebows or suggest that the claim would be covered if the Grebows mitigated prospective damages. Also in that case the damages had already occurred. Mercury took no action upon which the Grebows could or did rely. So estoppel is not applicable."

Fourth, the Court of Appeals considered the Grebows' claim for tortious breach of contract. Absent a claim for breach of contract, the Grebows could not establish a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The Court determined the trial court properly granted summary judgment to Mercury and properly denied the Grebows' motion for summary adjudication.

Finally, the Court of Appeals considered the Grebows' arguments in support of their motion for a new trial, which was based on a claim of an error of law and triable issues of fact. The Court determined the Grebows "essentially reargued" the issues raised in the motions for summary adjudication and summary judgment, and "introduced no new facts." The Court also affirmed the denial of the motion for new trial.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.