European Union: EU Clearing Obligation For Interest Rate Swaps Set For June 2016

The obligation for central clearing of OTC derivatives under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation will apply from June 2016. A Delegated Regulation that imposes a mandatory clearing obligation for interest rate swap contracts entered into with any European counterparty has now finally been published. Market participants trading OTC IRS derivatives that are not centrally cleared should consider how they are categorised under this legislation and when they will need to implement central clearing.


The European Markets Infrastructure Regulation ("EMIR") introduced a mechanism for a legal obligation to clear certain classes of OTC derivatives through clearing houses, also referred to as central counterparties ("CCPs").1 The European Securities and Markets Authority ("ESMA") has determined that certain interest rate swaps ("IRS") classes fulfil the criteria of standardisation, having sufficient volume, liquidity and pricing information, and so should be subject to mandatory clearing. Regulatory Technical Standards ("RTS") imposing a clearing obligation for those products have now been published. ESMA's draft standards for the clearing of certain credit derivatives have not yet been adopted by the European Commission.

In previous client notes, we have discussed the proposed RTS and ESMA's consultation approach.2 We have updated this information now that the final clearing obligation has been published. This note discusses who will be subject to the clearing obligation, sets out which asset classes must be cleared via a CCP and considers issues in the application of the new obligation to third country counterparties. A checklist of the practical implications is set out at the end of this note.

Scope of the Clearing Obligation

EMIR created broadly two categorisations for purposes of the clearing obligation: financial counterparties ("FCs") and non-financial counterparties ("NFCs"). A NFC would only be subject to mandatory clearing if its derivatives position exceeds a clearing threshold which has been set at, in gross notional value:

  • EUR 1 billion – credit derivative and equity derivative contracts; and
  • EUR 3 billion – interest rate derivative, foreign exchange derivative and commodity derivative contracts and other derivatives.

For the above purposes (but not for purposes of the separate thresholds in the table below), NFCs must aggregate positions across non-financial entities in their group but may exclude, subject to certain conditions, hedging arrangements. ESMA recommended, in its response to the European Commission's EMIR Review, that the hedging provisions should be removed from EMIR on the grounds that they do not properly allow for the identification of those NFCs that actually pose significant risk to the financial system.3

All FCs and NFCs that exceed the applicable clearing threshold ("NFC+") will be required to clear certain classes of IRS. The Delegated Regulation further categorises those two kinds of counterparties into four new categories for the purpose of phasing in compliance with the requirements and dealing with the frontloading issue (discussed below).

A contract between two counterparties in different categories would be subject to the clearing obligation from the later of the two dates specified above.

Certain industry groups, such as AIMA, have taken the view that foreign funds are to be considered as NFCs under EMIR. Those funds will now need to consider whether they are an AIF or a non-AIF NFC. The position of some entities under the four categories for the IRS clearing obligation remains unclear. To date, ESMA's view has been that non-EU AIFs that are marketed by a non-EU alternative investment fund manager ("AIFM") and EU AIFs that are marketed without a passport by non-EU AIFMs should be considered NFCs. Presumably, the same sort of logic can be applied to these new categories, in light of the drafting issues in connection with the applicability of this Delegated Regulation to third country entities (see below).

Application to Third Country Counterparties

EMIR provides that trades between a FC and an entity established in a third country that would be subject to the clearing obligation if it were established in the Union are caught by the clearing obligation.4 However, the Delegated Regulation does not specifically state that the clearing obligation for IRS applies to third country entities and does not include them in the categories of counterparties. As a result, it could be argued that no effective deadline is established under the Delegated Regulation for the clearing of EU entity to third country entity trades, on a literal interpretation. However, the assumption should be that third country counterparties should identify themselves into the four categories on an "as if they were" basis. This would be consistent with ESMA's July 2014 consultation paper5 and with the classification letter published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association.6

There is an extension of the application of the clearing deadline date, subject to certain conditions being met, where one counterparty is established in the European Union and the other is established in a third country and both are part of the same group. This only applies if the counterparties fall into any of categories 1, 2 or 3. For such trades, the clearing obligation would apply from either: (i) 21 December 2018 where there is no equivalence decision for the third country entity's country of establishment; or (ii) where an equivalence decision has been adopted, the later of: (a) 60 days after an equivalence decision on the clearing obligation for IRS; and (b) the date when the clearing obligation would apply according to which category the counterparties fall into. This exemption would make little sense if third country counterparties were not a priori within scope.

Equivalence Decisions have been made for the regulatory regime for CCPs in Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, Singapore, South Korea, South Africa, Switzerland and for the Canadian provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec. The Decisions declare equivalence between the legal and supervisory regimes of those countries or provinces and EMIR for the regulation and supervision of CCPs.7 Third country CCPs in these countries that have been recognised by ESMA can be used as a venue to satisfy the clearing obligation.

The recognition of a third country CCP is also important for the clearing members of the CCPs because lower capital requirements are imposed for exposures to a recognised CCP (which is afforded QCCP status) than for exposures to a non-QCCP CCP under the EU Capital Requirements Regulation. Under the CRR transitional measures, the enhanced capital requirements would have applied for exposures to non-QCCPs from 15 June 2014. Previously, the European Commission has used its powers to extend that deadline three times and may do so again. In particular, the deadline may be extended further given that there are CCPs established in major derivatives jurisdictions, such as the US, which are not yet recognised under EMIR.

Class of IRS Subject to Mandatory Clearing

The classes of IRS that must be cleared are:

  • Float-to-Float (basis) IRS that reference the Euro Interbank Offered Rate ("EURIBOR") or the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"), have a maturity of 28 days to 50 years and are settled in either euro, pounds sterling, Japanese yen or US dollars;
  • Fixed-to-Float (plain vanilla) IRS that reference the EURIBOR or LIBOR, have a maturity of 28 days to 50 years and are settled in either euro, pounds sterling, Japanese yen or US dollars;
  • Forward Rate Agreements that reference EURIBOR or LIBOR, have a maturity of three days to three years and are settled in either euro, pounds sterling or US dollars; and
  • Overnight Index Swaps that Reference Euro OverNight Index Average, FedFunds or the Sterling OverNight Index Average, have a maturity of seven days to three years and are settled in either euro, pounds sterling or US dollars.

ESMA recently proposed extending the scope of the clearing obligation for IRS to include fixed-to-float IRS denominated in Czech koruna, Danish krone, Hungarian forint, Norwegian krone, Swedish krona and Polish zloty to forward rate agreements denominated in Norwegian krone, Swedish krona and Polish zloty.8 The Commission has not yet adopted the proposed final draft RTS.

Exemption for Covered Bonds

Derivative contracts with covered bond issuers or with cover pools for covered bonds are exempt from the mandatory clearing obligation provided that they are:

  • Only used to hedge interest rate or currency mismatches of the cover pool for the covered bond;
  • Registered and recorded in the cover pool of the covered bond in compliance with national legislation;
  • Not subject to termination in the event of the failure of the covered bond issuer or the cover pool;
  • With a counterparty that is ranked at least pari-passu with the covered bond holders, unless that counterparty is the defaulting party or waives the pari-passu rank;
  • In compliance with the requirements set out in the EU Capital Requirements Regulation, which includes disclosure of certain information by an issuer to institutional investors and rules on eligibility of assets for collaterisation;9 and
  • Subject to a regulatory collaterisation requirement of at least 102%.

Calculation of Thresholds

The Delegated Regulation requires that the threshold for category 2 counterparties be based on "all of the group's non-centrally cleared derivatives, including foreign exchange forwards, swaps and currency swaps." It appears, although not expressly stated, that there is no exemption for intra-group hedging arrangements or for derivatives entered into solely for hedging purposes from the calculation of the threshold for any uncleared derivatives. This contrasts with EMIR,10 which provides that NFCs may exclude hedges for purposes of determining if they are NFC+s. The approach and language mirrors that taken in the proposed RTS on margin for uncleared derivatives11 as well as the related BCBS/IOSCO framework12 for the calculation of the threshold for the phase-in period for the margin requirements.

For AIFs or Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferrable Securities, the EUR 8 billion threshold would apply individually at fund level.

It is not entirely clear whether counterparties must include in the threshold calculation derivatives that are cleared through a CCP that is not yet authorised13 or recognised14 by ESMA, such as any non-EU CCP. The term "non-centrally cleared" is, however, a move away from the usual EU-approved-venue-linked language in EMIR. It is therefore reasonable to assume that trades cleared elsewhere are excluded for threshold calculating purposes. However, this position should be monitored as any ESMA or European Commission Q&A become available to provide clarification.


Under EMIR, some derivatives might be required to be cleared if executed prior to the clearing obligation being imposed. The risk of carrying out derivatives trades whose economics might later be altered by mandatory clearing is referred to as "frontloading." Under the Delegated Regulation, frontloading has been minimized so as to apply only to FCs. Following the European Commission's notification to ESMA that it intended to adopt the final draft RTS with modifications, the start date of the frontloading obligation has been further postponed with applicable dates being determined according to the category of the counterparty, the class of IRS and the minimum remaining maturity of the derivative. The revised EU approach to frontloading goes as far as might be possible under the Level 1 text as it will provide counterparties with the time to determine which category they belong to before they become subject to the clearing obligation.

ESMA has recently recommended eliminating frontloading altogether in its response on the EMIR Review. It is unclear if this will be made law in time for the IRS clearing obligation.

The ISDA Classification Letter

ISDA published an "EMIR Classification Letter" and related guidance15 in July 2015. The Letter is intended to help counterparties to determine and communicate their classification, including the classification of third country entities, under EMIR. The Letter aims to facilitate that determination by asking a series of questions.

Comparison with the CFTC Clearing Determination

The IRS classes specified in the Delegated Regulation are largely identical to the IRS subject to the clearing determination issued on 28 November 2012 by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") pursuant to authority conferred under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "CFTC Clearing Determination").16 The CFTC Clearing Determination also covers the following classes of index credit default swaps: North American Untranched (CDX) and European Untranched (iTraxx). Market participants were required to comply with the clearing requirement for the aforementioned products triggered by the CFTC Clearing Determination on a phased-in basis similar to that contemplated under the Delegated Regulation. CFTC rules classify, for purposes of a clearing requirement, market participants as either a Category 1 Entity (dealers, major participants and private funds active in the swap market) or a Category 2 Entity (financial entities other than a non-Category 1 Entity and third party managed sub-accounts, including ERISA pension plans). Category 3 Entities are all other market participants, including third party managed sub-accounts and ERISA pension plans, which are party to a swap not subject to the end user exception to mandatory clearing. With the exception of iTraxx CDS, swaps subject to the CFTC Clearing Determination were required to be cleared from 11 March 2013, 10 June 2013 and 9 September 2013 where both parties were Category 1 Entities, Category 2 Entities and Category 3 Entities, respectively. Clearing of iTraxx CDS was required as of 26 April 2013, 25 July 2013 and 23 October 2013 pursuant to the same phased in compliance framework. As provided under the Delegated Regulation, swaps between counterparties with different category classifications were required to be cleared as of the later compliance date.

Practical Implications and Checklist for Entities Holding OTC IRS

1 Determine if you have an IRS contract with an EU counterparty and whether it falls within the class of IRS that is required to be cleared.

2 Consider which of the four categories you will fit into – see table under Scope of Clearing Obligation.

3 Determine the clearing compliance deadline according to your category and that of your counterparty.

4 Communicate your classification to your relevant counterparty/ies by either executing the ISDA Classification Letter, adhering to the NFC protocol or completing equivalent bank documentation.

5 If not already set up to clear derivatives, ensure that all policies, agreements, procedures and arrangements are in place.

6 Clear the relevant IRS by the applicable deadline.


1 Article 4(1) of EMIR requires mandatory clearing of certain OTC derivatives (as determined by ESMA) which are entered into between parties who are EU authorised counterparties, relevant non-financial counterparties and certain non EU entities. For further information, you may refer to Client Note OTC Derivatives Regulation and Extraterritoriality III (8 February 2013), available here.

2 Our previous client notes are available here.

3 ESMA's responses to the EMIR Review are available here. Details of the European Commission's consultation on the EMIR Review are available here.

4 Article 4(1)(a)(iv) of EMIR.

5 ESMA's consultation paper is available here.

6 ISDA's EMIR Classification letter is available here.

7 You may like to see our client note, "Update on Third Country Equivalence under EMIR," dated 18 November 2015, available here.

8 The consultation paper is available here.

9 See Article 129 of the Capital Requirements Regulation for the full set of requirements.

10 Article 11(3) of EMIR.

11 The second consultation paper is available here.

12 The revised framework published in March 2015 is available here.

13 The list of EU authorised CCPs is available here.

14 The list of non EU recognised CCPs is available here.

15 The Letter and guidance are available here.

16 The CFTC Clearing Determination differs from the Delegated Regulation in that the maximum maturity for basis and plain vanilla IRS settled in yen is 30 years, forward rate agreements settled in yen are included and the maximum maturity for overnight index swaps is two years.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions