United States: SEC's "Unbundling Rule" Interpretation Requires New Non-Binding Target Stockholder Vote On Acquiror's Material Governance Changes In M&A Transactions—But Unlikely To Have Any Practical Impact"

The SEC has issued two new compliance and disclosure interpretations on the so-called "Unbundling Rule". The SEC appears to have been motivated to issue the CDIs as part of the political reaction against, and desire to deter, inversion transactions.

The CDIs relate to proposed M&A transactions in which an acquiror would be issuing its equity securities to the target stockholders and the transaction agreement requires the acquiror to make material changes to its organizational documents (such as corporate governance changes). The SEC staff has established a new requirement for separate, precatory (i.e., non-binding) target stockholder votes on material changes to the acquiror's organizational documents ("unbundled" from the target vote on the transaction itself)—which is designed to heighten the visibility to target stockholders of proposed acquiror corporate governance changes.

As discussed below, while the CDIs create new procedural and disclosure-related requirements, they do not impose any new substantive requirements. In our view, the new requirements are not likely to have any practical effect on inversions or other transactions. Transactions generally are driven primarily (if not exclusively) by the economics of the transaction—in the case of inversions, the tax benefits derived. In our view, it is unlikely that administrative action by the SEC (or, as occurred last year, by the IRS)—without legislative change that reduces the economic benefits of inversions—will be effective in deterring inversions.

  • The Unbundling Rule.

The Unbundling Rule (Rule 14a-4(a)(3) of the Exchange Act) requires that proxy statements "identify clearly and impartially each separate matter intended to be acted on" at a stockholder meeting (emphasis added). The SEC's guidance under the Rule is intended to clarify—in the context of a proposed M&A transaction in which the acquiror will issue its equity securities to the target and the transaction agreement requires that the acquiror make material changes to its organizational documents (such as material corporate governance changes)—whether the corporate governance changes must be voted on as "separate matters" (i.e., "unbundled") from the vote on the transaction itself. Each separate vote, of course, requires separate disclosure in the proxy statement and a separate box on the proxy card.

  • How the new CDIs differ from the past guidance.

The CDIs do not change past guidance with respect to the required vote by stockholders of the acquiror, but add a new requirement that there be a non-binding vote by target company stockholders. The previous guidance relating to the Unbundling Rule is contained in the SEC's "September 2004 Interim Supplement to the Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations." The new guidance (CDIs 201.01 and 201.02) was issued on October 25, 2015.

  • Acquiror's stockholder votes.

Under the previous guidance—and as confirmed in the new guidance—proposed material corporate governance changes must be presented to the acquiror's stockholders as separate proposals from the vote on the transaction itself. As in the former guidance, CDI 201.01 provides the following examples of amendments to an acquiror's organizational documents that would be material (and thus must be presented separately): adoption of a classified or staggered board; limitations on the removal of directors; adoption of supermajority voting provisions; delaying the annual meeting for more than a year; eliminating the ability to act by written consent; and changes in minimum quorum requirements. The following are provided as examples of amendments that in most cases would not be considered to be material: name change; restatement of a charter; and technical changes such as those resulting from anti-dilution provisions.

  • Target's stockholder votes—New requirement for non-binding target stockholder vote on acquiror's material governance changes.

CDI 201.01 provides that, if an acquiror is required to present corporate governance changes to its stockholders as separate matters for a vote, and if the target stockholders are to receive equity securities of the acquiror in the transaction, then the target company must present the same set of amendments separately on the target company's form of proxy and submit them to a vote of the target company stockholders. The staff explains in the CDI: "This is because the amendment, which is a term of the transaction agreement that target stockholders are being asked to approve, would effect a material change to the equity security that the target stockholders are receiving in the transaction." In the CDI, the staff notes its position that target company stockholders should have an opportunity to express their views separately on those material provisions that will establish their substantive rights as stockholders, even if they would not otherwise be entitled to vote on these matters under state corporate law, exchange rules or otherwise. Importantly, the new, separate vote of the target stockholders on the acquiror's material corporate governance changes would be precatory and not binding, and (absent agreement of the parties to condition the transaction on approval of the governance changes by the target stockholders) the acquiror would have all necessary legal and other authority without target stockholder approval to effect the corporate governance changes so long as its own stockholders approved them.

  • Transaction can be conditioned on approval of corporate governance changes.

The CDI confirms that, in all cases, the parties can condition closing of the transaction on acquiror and/or target stockholder approval of any or all of the separate proposals. The CDI does not require the parties to condition the transaction on approval of the governance changes by the target stockholders—and it appears that generally parties would be unlikely to do so, given that the acquiror would have all necessary legal and other authority to effect the corporate governance changes without target stockholder approval of them so long as its own stockholders approved them. It remains to be seen whether there may be future developments that would encourage parties to condition the transaction on target stockholder approval of the governance changes—such as, say, proxy advisory firms adopting policies for withhold campaigns against acquiror directors if they proceed without target stockholder approval of the governance changes. (In the event of such developments-which we view as unlikely-the new vote requirement could have a substantive impact.)

  • Technical clarifications.

The CDIs provide the following technical clarifications:

  • Formation of new acquisition vehicle. CDI 201.02 provides that, as was true under the former guidance, if the parties form a new entity to act as an acquisition vehicle that will issue securities in the transaction, the party whose stockholders are expected to own the largest percentage of equity securities of the new entity following the closing would be considered the acquiror for purposes of the Unbundling Rule. The CDI appears to provide that the new entity's organizational documents will be compared to the acquiror's organizational documents to determine whether there are material changes.
  • Amendment to increase authorized shares. CDI 201.01 clarifies that, if the acquiror submits for approval of its stockholders an amendment to increase the number of authorized shares, that amendment need not be submitted by the target to its stockholders so long as the increase is limited to the number of shares reasonably expected to be issued in the transaction.
  • Conditions. As noted, the parties can agree to condition any one or more of the proposals on which action is to be taken on the approval of any one or more of the other proposals. If the parties condition the transaction or any of the separate matters on approval of any other matter, the conditions must be clearly disclosed and indicated on the form of proxy.

Practical Effect of the New Requirement

In our view, the new, separate vote required by target stockholders on material corporate governance changes to be made by the acquiror represents process without substance and is unlikely to have a practical effect, for the following reasons:

  • Target stockholder vote is not substantive. The separate votes of the acquiror's stockholders on the transaction, the issuance of equity, and the proposed corporate governance changes are substantive, in that acquiror stockholder approval is required under state law and/or exchange rules to effect each of them. Because the votes are separate, the acquiror stockholders can approve the transaction and at the same time in effect veto corporate governance changes that they do not support. Thus, the acquiror stockholder votes on the governance changes provide the acquiror stockholders with meaningful leverage with respect to the transaction, as their approval is required for the contemplated governance changes to be effected. By contrast, the separate votes of the target's stockholders on the governance changes are not substantive. The target stockholder votes on the governance changes do not provide the target stockholders with any leverage with respect to the transaction—because their approval is not required for the contemplated governance changes to be effected. The target stockholders can in effect veto the governance changes that they do not support only by holding the transaction hostage and not approving it. Without target stockholder approval of the governance changes, the transaction and the governance changes still can proceed (absent the parties having agreed that they would not proceed without target stockholder approval of the governance changes).
  • Separating matters has no effect when they can be conditioned on each other. Given that target stockholder approval is not required to effect the acquiror's governance changes, it appears that there would be no reason for the parties to decide to condition the transaction on obtaining that approval. Even if the parties were for some reason to condition the transaction on target stockholder approval of the governance changes, however, generally, there would be no substantive difference between a single vote on the transaction agreement with the governance changes embedded in it (as has been the case in the past) as compared to separate votes on the transaction and each of the governance changes (as now required by the CDIs).
  • Stockholders will focus primarily on the economics of the proposed transaction. We expect that target stockholders will be primarily motivated by the economics of the proposed transaction. If they regard the economics as favorable, in our view, they are unlikely to try to use any leverage that they have to vote against the transaction in order to veto the governance changes because they will not want to jeopardize the deal happening.
  • Inversions. There has been speculation that the CDIs are the SEC's effort to respond to the political and public displeasure with inversion transactions (in which a U.S. company merges with a non-U.S. company to obtain the tax-related benefits of being reincorporated in the acquiror's jurisdiction.) Inversions have continued notwithstanding the U.S Treasury's changes last year in the tax-related benefits that drive inversions. (See our article, Recent IRS Pronouncement Aims to Stem Tide of Tax-Motivated Inversions—But, In the Absence of Legislative Change, These Administrative Measures Are Not Likely to Prevent Future Inversions, Fried Frank M&A Quarterly, 4th Quarter 2014.) The heightened visibility of the governance changes resulting from the new requirements might be expected to have an impact if it were the general public (which generally has a negative view of inversions) voting on the proposed transaction rather than the stockholders of the acquiror and the target. As noted above, however, we expect that target stockholders will be primarily motivated by the economics of the transaction. Moreover, it is usually large companies that engage in inversions, and they typically have large, sophisticated institutional investors for whom heightened visibility of corporate governance changes through a separate vote (rather than a vote on the transaction agreement that encompasses those proposed changes) is not likely to affect their knowledge of, focus on, or degree of support for, those changes. We note that the imposition of more substantive limitations on inversions can be effected only by state or federal legislation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions