United States: New Jersey Supreme Court to Hear Transfer of Insurance Rights Case

Last Updated: December 7 2015
Article by Harry J. Moren

On November 16, the New Jersey Supreme Court announced it would review Givaudan Fragrances Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company Co. The dispute, correctly decided by the New Jersey Appellate Division, centers around whether the assignment of insurance rights in corporate transactions validly transfers coverage for prior occurrences. This issue has gripped policyholders and insurers since 2003, when the California Supreme Court upset then-settled expectations of corporate transactional lawyers and risk managers in its decision of Henkel Corp v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity.

In Henkel, the Court held that an asset seller's contractual assignment of insurance coverage rights to the buyer after a loss had already occurred was ineffective if the policy contained a standard "no assignment" clause and the insurer had not consented to the assignment. As a result, companies who had bought assets, including both liabilities as well as all contracts related to those assets, found themselves confronted by an argument (raised by insurers) that the historic insurance purchased by the seller to protect against those liabilities was unavailable. Thus, Henkel—and many other courts around the country that subsequently were asked by insurers to weigh in on the issue—injected uncertainty into corporate transactions. Henkel and its progeny were roundly criticized by policyholders and corporate lawyers, as they were contrary to an overwhelming majority of decisions nationwide freely permitting post-loss assignment of insurance rights. As we have described in a prior post, the California Supreme Court recently took a mulligan and reversed itself in Fluor in August 2015 in a decision policyholders welcomed.

The decision in Fluor is consistent with the purpose of consent-to-assignment clauses. Before a loss occurs, these provisions protect an insurer from exposure to losses caused by a different policyholder than the one whose risk the insurer underwrote. Yet once a loss has occurred, the insurer's risk is unaffected by a change in the identity of the party making a claim for coverage on that loss. Occurrence-based policies provide coverage for "occurrences" that take place during the policy period; once an occurrence has taken place, the insurer's liability becomes fixed. A transfer of rights to pay for claims due to occurrences that already have taken place therefore creates no additional risk. To the contrary, allowing insurers to escape responsibility on the ground that they did not consent to such a post-loss assignment would grant insurers a windfall, allowing them to accept premiums and avoid payment obligations on the basis of a no-assignment-without-consent technicality. Indeed, in one of the few cases where a policyholder actually requested consent, the insurer refused for no reason other than it could and ultimately was held to have acted in bad faith. San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Argonaut Ins. Co., No. GIC874394, Minute Order (Cal. Super. Ct., San Diego County Mar. 17, 2009).

The same month that Fluor was decided, an appellate court in New Jersey in Givaudan Fragrances considered a transfer of insurance rights and found—correctly we believe—that the assignment of rights to liability coverage for losses that already have occurred is valid, even without insurer consent. Finally, it seemed, the courts all were getting the fact that an assignment of insurance rights should be permitted as long as it does not materially increase the risk to the insurers. Yet just when it finally seemed safe to go back in the water, the New Jersey Supreme Court has agreed to review the Givaudan Fragrances dispute. The high court's decision to grant review does not provide insight into its reasons for taking up the appeal. However, clearly there is some uncertainty among New Jersey's courts about this issue, and the Supreme Court's decision will resolve this uncertainty. No date for argument has been set.

In Givaudan Fragrances, a company previously known as the Givaudan Corporation manufactured flavors, fragrances, and other chemicals in New Jersey. The defendant insurers provided policies to the Givaudan Corporation from 1964 to 1986. In 1987 and 1988, the Givaudan Corporation entered into administrative consent orders with the N.J. Department of Environmental Protection for the remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater from certain of its New Jersey manufacturing facilities.

In a series of corporate transactions in the 1990s, the Givaudan Corporation became the Givaudan Flavors Corporation (Flavors) and transferred the assets and liabilities of its fragrances division to a newly formed spin-off, Givaudan Fragrances Corporation (Fragrances). The same parent company owns both Flavors and Fragrances.

Litigation ensued over the historic environmental liabilities against Fragrances. In 2004, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency notified Fragrances it was potentially liable under CERCLA for discharges from one of the Givaudan plants. In 2006, the N.J. Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) sued Fragrances for discharges from the same plant. In 2009, defendants in another DEP action relating to other contamination sought third-party contribution from Fragrances.

In 2010, Flavors assigned to Fragrances all of the rights to insurance coverage under the 1964-1986 policies of the Givaudan Corporation, its predecessor, for all occurrences that took place before the original transfer of assets and liabilities to Fragrances, and for all resulting losses. The insurers contended that the assignment was invalid because the policies prohibited assignment without the insurers' consent, which had not been given. The trial court agreed with the insurers, finding that the assignment was a global assignment of claims and therefore an invalid assignment of policies, rather than a permissible assignment of a chose in action for a particular claim.

As discussed above, the New Jersey Appellate Division disagreed and reversed the trial court. The Appellate Division's holding in Givaudan Fragrances is consistent with New Jersey precedent and the common law in other jurisdictions.  It also is consistent with the result of Fluor.

So why did the Supreme Court take the case?  We note that before the Givauden Fragrances appellate court decision was handed down, a New Jersey trial court confronted a similar issue and ruled against the policyholder. In Haskell Properties v. American Insurance Company, No. BER-L-5396-13 (N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div. June 6, 2014), the trial court held that an assignment out of bankruptcy entitling the purchaser of real property assets to historic insurance to cover environmental liabilities was invalid. The trial court's primary ruling was that the rights to insurance did not belong to the Bankrupt Estate and so there was nothing to assign. However, the court went on to rule that insurer consent was required and there was no assignable chose in action because the ongoing environmental loss had not matured into a right to payment at the time of assignment. Like the California Supreme Court in Henkel, the Haskell Properties court reasoned that an assignable "chose in action" required an immediate, fixed obligation to pay.

While the wrongly decided Haskell Properties case was not appealed, the New Jersey Supreme Court now has an opportunity to clarify that under New Jersey law post-loss assignments of occurrence-based policy insurance rights are proper, even without insurer consent where there is no change in risk. In the Givaudan Fragrances case, assets and insurance rights were transferred within the same corporate family and the clearly drafted assignment leaves no room for insurers to argue that their risk is expanded. That should be the end of the story.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
21 Sep 2018, Conference, Florida, United States

Employment partner, Michael Weil will be participating in The Intellectual Property Law Institute’s 2018 Conference.

26 Sep 2018, Conference, New York, United States

Employment Partner, Mandy Perry and Chair of Orrick's Global Employment Law Practice, Mike Delikat will be participating in the Global Business Protections 2018: International Restrictive Covenants and Confidential Information Conference.

26 Sep 2018, Seminar, Tokyo, Japan

Orrick’s Global Japan Practice is hosting a series of “Orrick Library” seminars to explore legal issues in various fields in Japan as well as the United States, Asia and Europe

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions