United States: The New Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure: Rule 37(E) – A True Safe Harbor From Spoliation Sanctions?

Barring any unforeseen, last minute Congressional action, on December 1, 2015, amendments to ten of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will become effective. The amendment process began five years ago when the Judicial Conference's Advisory Committee on Civil Rules (the "Advisory Committee") explored changes at a May 2010 conference at Duke University School of Law. Over the next three years, the Advisory Committee developed the proposed changes, and an extensive public comment period followed in which more than 2,300 public comments on the proposed changes were submitted. Earlier this year the Supreme Court approved the proposed amendments to Rules 1, 4, 16, 26, 30, 31, 33, 34, 37, and 55.

This article focuses on one of the most significant changes to the Federal Rules—the rewriting of Rule 37(e) governing the failure to preserve electronically stored information ("ESI"). We have provided a quick reference guide to all the proposed changes, however, at the end of this article.


Current Rule 37(e) was adopted in 2006 to serve as a "safe harbor" for ESI lost as the result of routine, good-faith practices. It provides:

(e) Failure to Provide Electronically Stored Information. Absent exceptional circumstances, a court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party for failing to provide electronically stored information lost as a result of the routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system.1

Although Rule 37(e) seemed to protect innocent parties who merely made a mistake resulting in the loss of ESI, in application, the rule largely did not provide such protection. Despite the seemingly difficult standard to impose sanctions—a court must find "exceptional circumstances"—court-ordered sanctions are not uncommon. For example, courts often award sanctions based on other authority, such as a court's inherent powers.2 In addition, although the existing rule appears to prevent sanctions if a party loses information as a result of negligence, some courts, such as the Second Circuit, have authorized adverse-inference instructions based on a finding of negligence or gross negligence.3 As a result, litigants often preserve much more information than they will ever use in litigation. For example, in 2011, Microsoft reported that for every 2.3 MB of data that is actually used in litigation it preserves 787.5 GB—a ratio of 340,000 to 1.4

In rewriting the entirety of Rule 37(e), the Advisory Committee concluded that the current Rule 37(e), in practice, has rarely provided a "safe harbor" for litigants. The Advisory Committee Notes to the new rule (the "Notes") state that:

[t]his limited rule has not adequately addressed the serious problems resulting from the continued exponential growth in the volume of such information. Federal circuits have established significantly different standards for imposing sanctions or curative measures on parties who fail to preserve electronically stored information. These developments have caused litigants to expend excessive effort and money on preservation in order to avoid the risk of severe sanctions if a court finds they did not do enough.

As a result, the Advisory Committee decided that "the time had come for developing a rules-based approach to preservation and sanctions."5


Proposed Rule 37(e) (the "New Rule") provides as follows (with deleted language crossed out and added language underlined below):

(e) Failure to Provide Preserve Electronically Stored Information. Absent exception circumstances, a court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party for failing to provide electronically stored information lost as a result of the routine, good faith operation of an electronic information system. If electronically stored information that should have been preserved in the anticipation or conduct of litigation is lost because a party failed to take reasonable steps to preserve it, and it cannot be restored or replaced through additional discovery, the court:

(1) upon finding prejudice to another party from loss of the information, may order measures no greater than necessary to cure the prejudice; or

(2) only upon finding that the party acted with the intent to deprive another party of the information's use in the litigation may:

(A) presume that the lost information was unfavorable to the party;

(B) instruct the jury that it may or must presume the information was unfavorable to the party; or

(C) dismiss the action or enter a default judgment.6

When Does The New Rule Apply?

It is important to note at the outset when the New Rule applies. First, the New Rule, like the current rule, applies only to ESI. Second, the New Rule applies only when ESI is lost. The Notes make it clear that loss of ESI from one source is often harmless if substitute information can be found elsewhere. The Notes also state that the New Rule does not apply when information is lost before a duty to preserve arises. Third, the New Rule applies only if the lost ESI should have been preserved in the anticipation or conduct of litigation and the party failed to take reasonable steps to preserve it. The Notes recognize that because of the large volumes of ESI usually involved in cases and the many devices that generate such information, perfection in preserving all relevant ESI is often impossible and thus "reasonable steps" to preserve suffice. The New Rule is inapplicable when the loss of ESI occurs despite the party's reasonable steps to preserve.

What If The Lost Information Can Be Restored Or Replaced?

Under the New Rule, if a party fails to take reasonable steps to preserve ESI that should have been preserved and the ESI is lost as a result, the first step is to determine whether the lost information can be restored or replaced through additional discovery. If the ESI is restored or replaced, no further measures under Rule 37 should be taken. The Notes state that efforts to restore or replace lost information through discovery should be proportional to the apparent importance of the lost information to claims or defenses in the litigation. The Notes provide as an example that substantial measures should not be employed to restore or replace information that is marginally relevant or duplicative. Often parties can recover lost information by restoring backup tapes, but the restoration can be very costly and time intensive. The Notes suggest that resort to restoration of backup tapes is not necessary in all circumstances.

Measures Upon Finding Prejudice

The New Rule states that resort to subsection (e)(1)—where upon finding prejudice the court can order measures no greater than necessary to cure the prejudice—should only occur if:

(1) the ESI should have been preserved in the anticipation or conduct of litigation;

(2) a party failed to take reasonable steps to preserve the ESI;

(3) ESI was lost as a result;

(4) the ESI could not be restored or replaced by additional discovery; and

(5) the court finds prejudice to another party from the loss of the ESI.

The Notes state that the New Rule is silent regarding who has the burden of proof in proving or disproving prejudice. The New Rule leaves judges with discretion to determine how best to assess prejudice in particular cases. Once a finding of prejudice is made, then the court can employ measures "no greater than necessary to cure the prejudice." The Notes state that it may be that serious measures are necessary to cure prejudice found by the court, "such as forbidding the party that failed to preserve information from putting on certain evidence, permitting the parties to present evidence and argument to the jury regarding the loss of information, or giving the jury instructions to assist in its evaluation of such evidence or argument." However, the Notes warn that courts must be careful to ensure that any curative measures under subsection (e)(1) do not have the effect of measures that are only permitted under subsection (e)(2).

Sanctions Upon Finding Intent

Subsection (e)(2)—permitting adverse inference instructions and dismissal or default judgment—applies only if the same first four factors under subsection (e)(1) are applicable plus the court finds that the party that lost the ESI acted with the intent to deprive another party of the information's use in the litigation. The Notes admit the curative measures in this section are harsh but that the subsection was designed to provide a uniform standard in federal court for use of these serious measures. The Notes conclude that the better rule for the negligent or grossly negligent loss of ESI is to preserve a broad range of measures to cure prejudice caused by the loss of the ESI and limit the most severe measures to instances of intentional loss or destruction. Subsection (e)(2) does not include a requirement that the court find prejudice to the party deprived of the ESI because the finding of intent can support an inference that the opposing party was prejudiced by the loss of the ESI that would have favored its position. The Notes caution courts in using the measures specified in this subsection and advise that the severe measures should not be used when the ESI lost was relatively unimportant or lesser measures such as those specified in subsection (e)(1) would be sufficient to address the loss.


The New Rule eliminates some of the uncertainty surrounding potential sanctions in civil litigation due to spoliation. It creates a uniform standard across federal courts regarding when sanctions for spoliation are appropriate. The New Rule should reduce the prevalence of sanctions and give in-house legal departments some comfort that a mere mistake in preservation will not result in draconian sanctions. The New Rule is clearly a step in the right direction and a significant advancement for defendants who often produce large volumes of ESI in civil litigation.

However, the New Rule is not a cure-all for corporations and financial institutions that struggle with numerous preservation obligations. The New Rule does not govern preservation obligations instituted by regulators or pursuant to regulatory investigations. In addition, the new rule still leaves much open to interpretation. What will courts consider "reasonable steps" to preserve information? How broadly will courts view whether a party has been prejudiced? What will a court view as "no greater than necessary to cure the prejudice"? Who has the burden of proving or disproving prejudice? These are all questions that courts will have to decide, which leaves open the possibility of different courts creating different standards—the exact problem the New Rule was drafted to solve.


1 FED R. CIV. P. 37(e).

2 See Nucor Corp. v. Bell, 251 F.R.D. 191, 196 (D.S.C. 2008) ("Assuming arguendo that defendants' conduct would be protected under the safe-harbor provision, Rule 37(e)'s plain language states that it only applies to sanctions imposed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (e.g., a sanction made under Rule 37(b) for failing to obey a court order). Thus, the rule is not applicable when the court sanctions a party pursuant to its inherent powers.").

3 See Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Fin. Corp., 306 F.3d 99, 113 (2d Cir. 2002) ("discovery sanctions, including an adverse inference instruction, may be imposed upon a party that has breached a discovery obligation not only through bad faith or gross negligence, but also through ordinary negligence").

4 Letter from Microsoft to Honorable David G. Campbell, Chair, Advisory Committee on Civil Rules (Aug. 31, 2011), available at http://www.uscourts.gov/file/microsoftpdf.

5 See Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure June 2013 Agenda Book at 30-31.

6 Proposed FED. R. CIV. P. 37(e).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.