United States: Leonard Peltier And Public Displays Of Art—The Government Taking Sides On Whose Paintings Are Shown Stirs Up First Amendment Problems

Last Updated: November 18 2015
Article by Nicholas M. O'Donnell

An exhibition in Washington (state) that included art by a number of Native Americans, including Leonard Peltier, has provoked an outcry that may have Constitutional dimensions that went unconsidered.  Peltier is a controversial Native American activist who was convicted of murdering in 1975 two FBI agents, Jack R. Coler and Ronald A. Williams.  His conviction has long been a Rorschach Test for responses to Native American activism and the federal government's response—Peltier has strenuously insisted he is innocent, and the FBI has adamantly maintained he was properly convicted.  This has now raised its head in the realm of the public display of art, and whether the government may, or should discriminate among artists.  After an outcry about the inclusion of Peltier's art by a number of current and retired law enforcement officials, the Washington Department of Labor and Industries has announced that it will remove Peltier's paintings from the display that marked Native American Indian Heritage Month there, and has apologized.  Yet regardless of one's opinion if Peltier's guilt or innocence, the government has stepped in a First Amendment quagmire when it made a public forum available for expression and then removed the expressive work of only one person because of who he is.  The First Amendment, after all, acts to protect expression regardless of popularity, indeed, particularly so.  It is hard to argue that his work was removed for any of the reasons that courts generally permit restrictions on speech in the various kinds of public forums.  It remains to be seen whether Peltier will object on those grounds.

The full story of Peltier's notoriety has been the subjects of books and movies, but a quick overview will suffice to contextualize the current dispute over his art.  Peltier was originally from North Dakota, of Lakota Sioux and Chippewa, descent, among others.  After living in Seattle briefly, Peltier became involved with a number of causes championing Native American rights, and joined the American Indian Movement (AIM), returning to the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota in around 1973.  AIM quickly became one of the most prominent Native American activist groups, and the source of considerable controversy itself.  AIM is best known for the occupation of the offices of the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 1971, seizing the Mayflower replica in Boston, occupying Mount Rushmore, and the armed occupation of the Wounded Knee historic site in the Pine Ridge Reservation in 1973 by the self titled Guardians of the Oglala Nation (GOON).  Peltier was in jail on another charge at the time.  The Wounded Knee event was followed by a period of intense violence within AIM, during which dozens of its members were murdered.

Wounded Knee  © 1997 Nicholas M. O'Donnell

It was during this time that Peltier again returned to Pine Ridge.  Pine Ridge is a place of intense and tragic beauty, no place more so than Wounded Knee (I took the picture above there in 1997).  The shootout that killed Coler and Williams occurred on June 26, 1975.  Peltier admitted shooting at the agents who were killed, but denied actually firing shots that hit them (they were shot at close range).  Peltier was sought after events that included the recovery of Coler's handgun from a car that Peltier was driving and an AR-15 shell casing.  Peltier fled to Canada, was extradited, and tried for murder in Fargo, North Dakota.  Despite later disputes about the ballistic evidence offered and alibis presented by Peltier (and witnesses that placed him at the shooting who later recanted), Peltier was convicted and sentenced to two life terms.  Those convictions have been upheld in a variety of appeals, and Peltier's parole has always been denied.  He is presently incarcerated in Coleman Federal Correctional Facility in Coleman, Florida.

Not surprisingly, the question of Peltier's guilt has been a hot button issue since he was convicted.  Law enforcement officials are incensed at the notion that there is any dispute, while Peltier's supporters argue that the circumstantial case was based on deeply flawed foresensic evidence.

No one seems to have thought of any of this, remarkably, when Peltier's paintings were included in the Washington exhibit.  After making the connection, retired FBI agent Ray Lauer gave an interview to the local television in which he called Peltier a "thug" and "an unrepentant cop killer."  The National Retired Agents Association also formally complained.

A spokesperson for the Washington agency responded that the department "felt bad" and that the exhibition was not meant as an endorsement of Peltier's cause.  In response to the complaints, Peltier's paintings will be removed.

Here is the problem: the government has a right to display, not display, or even destroy, art that the government owns.  A case in recent years involving a mural in a government office in Maine underscored the point: when Maine's governor decided that he disliked the pro-labor message in a mural, lawsuits to stop him from doing so were unsuccessful because the government has the right to speak, or not to speak, a particular message.  A choice to make or withdraw approval for a particular expression, whatever one thinks of it, does not infringe the free expression or speech of anyone else.

This is entirely different, however.  The Maine mural belonged to the government.  The Washington agency opened its doors to private individuals to showcase their expressive content.  This is what First Amendment lawyers call a "forum," and what kind of forum it is drives many First Amendment cases.  First, there are "traditional public forums."  Traditional public forums include public parks, sidewalks and areas that have been traditionally open to political speech and debate. These forums enjoy the strongest First Amendment protections.  The government may only impose content-neutral restrictions as to time, place, and manner of speech (only during daylight hours, no amplification, etc.), it may not engage in viewpoint discrimination (no pro-war speech, no anti-war speech).  Any restriction of speech in such a forum will be reviewed with strict scrutiny and will survive only if it serves a compelling state interest.

Next, there are "designated public forums," in which the government opens public property for expression that is not ordinarily a forum for public expression.  The government may close a designated public forums at any time, but so long as it is available, it must be content neutral in the same manner as a traditional forum.

Lastly, government may limit access to a "limited public forum" to certain kinds of expression or speech.  Even though the government may discriminate against certain classes of speakers, it still may not discriminate based on viewpoints.

If the Native American Heritage exhibition is anything other than a limited public forum, then removing Peltier's art from the show seems to be a cut and dry First Amendment violation.  If the agency is a traditional public forum (probably not), there is no question that removing one artist is not a neutral time, place, or manner restriction.  If the show were a designated public forum, the government's only recourse is to close the whole show so that there is no speech, not remove one speaker.  So in either case the government's actions could not survive review, certainly not under strict scrutiny.

What about if the show is a limited public forum?  It's plausible the government could argue it was restricting one class of speakers—convicted murderers—so long as it applied that restriction evenly.  Yet the only "class" of speaker in the show on its own terms was that of Native American artist.  Peltier is clearly still that regardless of what happened at Pine Ridge in 1975.  Inventing the category of restricted speaker for exclusion only after the fact does not pass muster.

If one thinks of a similar hypothetical, the problem is easy to see.  Assume Government Agency X wanted to honor Veterans Day, and put up an exhibition of paintings by veterans.  After one of the paintings arouses controversy as either critical or supportive of some military decision, the government removes the painting but does not restrict any of the other veterans' works.  In colloquial terms it is flagrant censorship.  In First Amendment terms, it is viewpoint discrimination, and it is not allowed.

Peltier is, to many, an unsympathetic figure, particularly with law enforcement.  Their revulsion at celebrating Peltier is not hard to understand.  To many others he is a symbol of prosecutorial excess.  Whatever one's opinion about him, however, arguably the most consistent thread in First Amendment case law is that the right exists precisely to protect those with whom the government disagrees or finds unfavorable.  From here it looks like the State of Washington has neglected to do just that.  Whether anything comes of it will be interesting to watch.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nicholas M. O'Donnell
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.