United States: Discretionary Executive Compensation Enhancements And Their Impact On The Say-On-Golden-Parachute Advisory Vote

Last Updated: November 30 2015
Article by Matthew M. Friestedt

Article by Matthew Friestedt and Jane Wang*

Under Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K, public companies are required to provide their shareholders with a non-binding vote to approve "golden parachute" compensation arrangements disclosed in their merger- and acquisition-related proxy or consent solicitations.  Although the vote is advisory, it provides shareholders with an opportunity to signal whether they approve of executive compensation that is triggered or changed in the transaction context.  This article provides an update1 on the discretionary enhancements that companies have made in connection with signing up merger agreements filed with the SEC from May 2013 through April 2014 (the third year since the say-on-golden-parachute vote rules went into effect) and Institutional Shareholder Services ("ISS") recommendations and shareholder voting results in response to such actions.  It also provides an update on the size of reported golden parachute compensation relative to the target's equity value for certain transactions that were announced between May 2013 through April 2014.

Among the 169 companies that filed non-tender offer merger agreements from May 2013 through April 2014 and held a say-on-golden-parachute vote, 65 of the companies (or about 38%) adopted executive compensation enhancements in connection with the transaction.2 Relatively common enhancements which generally did not trigger a negative ISS recommendation included:  (A) deal bonuses paid on closing (3 out of 17 companies, or 18%, received ISS recommendations against), (B) retention bonuses paid after closing (9 out of 27 companies, or 33%, received ISS recommendations against), (C) new severance entitlements (3 out of 13 companies, or 23%, received ISS recommendations against) and (D) new equity grants (4 out of 12 companies, or 33%, received ISS recommendations against).  In comparison, the following enhancements were more likely to receive a negative ISS recommendation:  (A) accelerated vesting or payment of performance-based equity or cash incentives without actual achievement of the relevant performance metrics (3 out of 6 companies, or 50%, received ISS recommendations against), (B) cash out of severance, or conversion of severance into a retention bonus or new equity grants, without an actual termination of employment (6 out of 12 companies, or 50%, received ISS recommendations against), (C) recently adopted excise tax gross-ups (2 out of 3 companies, or 67%, received ISS recommendations against) and (D) retroactive salary increases (1 out of 1 company, or 100%, received an ISS recommendation against).

ISS continues to look at a number of factors in determining its recommendation,3 including "recent actions (such as extraordinary equity grants) that make packages so attractive as to influence merger agreements that may not be in the best interests of shareholders" and placing more weight on recent amendments that incorporate problematic features.  While certain enhancements are more likely to result in a negative recommendation, ISS appears to be taking a more nuanced view towards golden parachutes.  For example, in Actavis, Inc.'s acquisition of Warner Chilcott plc, both the target and the acquiror accelerated the vesting of their executives' stock-based compensation to avoid triggering the 15% "inversion" excise tax under Section 4985 of the U.S. Tax Code as a result of the combined entity's reincorporation to Ireland.  The acquiror received a positive ISS recommendation for the say-on-golden-parachute vote, with the ISS report explaining that the accelerated equity represented a small fraction of the total transaction value and that no other problematic features were identified.  In contrast, the target received a negative ISS recommendation, with the ISS report stating that multiple problematic features were identified and that the accelerated equity taken together with an existing Section 280G excise tax gross-up raised significant concerns.4

One of the other factors that ISS looks at is whether the golden parachute payments are excessive, either on an absolute basis or as a percentage of transaction equity value.  The chart below shows the size of reported golden parachute payments as a percentage of the target's equity value for the 25 largest deals5 announced from May 2013 through April 2014 and the 65 companies that substantively enhanced executive compensation arrangements6:

Consistent with prior years, golden parachute amounts as a percentage of the target's equity value tend to increase as deals become smaller.  For the largest 25 deals, only one of the companies reported golden parachute payments that were in excess of two times the applicable average.  In contrast, for the 65 deals with enhancements, a meaningful number of companies reported golden parachute payments that were in excess of two times the average (11 companies or 17%, whether looking at the CEO only or at the NEOs as a group).

ISS's recommendations continue to be influential on shareholder voting.  Other than the Atlantic Coast Financial Corp. acquisition by Florida Community Bank (where the failure was unrelated to executive compensation),7 each of the companies that received a positive ISS recommendation passed its say-on-golden-parachute vote.  Excluding the Atlantic Coast deal, the 44 companies that made enhancements and received a positive ISS recommendation received strong support on the vote with an average pass rate of 87%.  In comparison, 2 of the 20 companies that made enhancements and received a negative ISS recommendation failed the vote and the remaining 18 companies received weaker support with an average pass rate of 66%.

While the say-on-golden-parachute vote is an important avenue for shareholder concerns, at this time, shareholder support for the transaction itself continues to remain unaffected by the results of the say-on-golden-parachute vote.  Shareholders approved each of the deals with executive compensation enhancements, other than the Atlantic Coast deal.  However, the following year's say-on-pay vote could be impacted if the company does not respond accordingly.  Of the four failed say-on-pay votes at the following annual meeting, Cynosure, Inc. received a negative recommendation from ISS because it awarded "excessive severance payments and excise tax gross-ups to the CEO of an acquired company [Palomar Medical Technologies] upon his resignation," citing a "lack of responsiveness to shareholder concerns" and "no disclosure detailing any shareholder engagement efforts."

To view the full article please click here.

* Matthew Friestedt is a partner and Jane Wang is an associate in the Executive Compensation and Benefits group of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.


1 For an analysis of the discretionary enhancements that companies made in connection with signing up merger agreements from April 2011 through April 2013, see "Recent Discretionary Executive Compensation Enhancements and Their Impact On the Say-On-Golden-Parachute Advisory Vote" by Matthew Friestedt and Jane Wang, which was published in the November/December 2013 issue of The M&A Lawyer.

2  Although golden parachute arrangements must be disclosed in connection with acquisitions implemented through a tender offer, there is no related say-on-golden-parachute vote and, accordingly, tender offers were not included in our review of executive compensation enhancements.  In addition, our review did not include arrangements where there was no say-on-golden parachute vote because the target was a foreign issuer or where ISS did not produce a recommendation report for the target (e.g., when none of ISS's institutional investor clients held the target's shares at the time of the transaction).

3  For more information on ISS's policy on say-on-golden parachute proposals, see the 2014 U.S. Proxy Voting Summary Guidelines at http://www.issgovernance.com/file/2014_Policies/ISSUSSummaryGuidelines2014March12.pdf

4  Similarly, Perrigo Company provided full gross-up payments for the 15% "inversion" excise tax imposed under Section 4985 in its acquisition of Elan Corporation.  Perrigo initially received a negative ISS recommendation, but after discussions with Perrigo, ISS issued an updated positive recommendation on the basis that there was no accelerated equity vesting and the tax savings as a result of the merger "far outweigh[ed]" the costs of the gross-up.

5  In determining the largest 25 deals, we excluded any deals that were announced but for which the merger agreement had not been filed with the SEC as of the date of this publication or for which no golden parachute amounts were reported.

6  In calculating this percentage, we used the reported golden parachute amounts required by Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K and the target's equity value, measured by market capitalization, reported by MergerMetrics.com, ThomsonOne or Bloomberg, L.P.

7  Despite a positive recommendation from ISS, shareholders rejected both the deal itself and the say-on-golden parachute vote.  Dissident board members, including the former chairman, sent letters to shareholders arguing that the deal price was too low.

Previously published by the M&A Lawyer in July/August 2015

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.