United States: Lost Legatee Beneficiary Claims

Last Updated: November 6 2015
Article by Jeffrey Lewis

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in Guy v. Liederbach, 459 A.2d 744 (Pa. 1982), a plurality decision, first considered whether a lost legatee could assert a malpractice claim against the lawyer who drafted the will. In Guy, the lawyer had drafted a will for a then-Pennsylvania resident, the execution of which was witnessed by the named legatee. Eighteen years later, the testator died in New Jersey. Unfortunately for the legatee, a statute was then in effect in New Jersey, since repealed, that nullified any inheritance to any legatee who had witnessed the execution of a will. Because the will was probated in New Jersey the legatee was effectively disinherited, so she sued the lawyer who had drafted the will.

The lawyer defended on the basis that he had never represented the legatee; therefore, absent the existence of an attorney/client relationship, the legatee and the lawyer did not stand in privity. The legatee argued that the court should adopt the reasoning in Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.21d 583, 264 P.2d 685, 15 Cal.Rptr. 821 (1961), which stated the so-called "California rule" for malpractice suits in negligence to allow a lost legatee to assert a claim in negligence. That rule is not a simple negligence standard but involves the application of a six-part balancing test on a case-by-case basis. The legatee also argued that she should be recognized as an intended third-party beneficiary, under Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 301 (1979), of the contract between the lawyer and the testator, arguing, in effect, that the lawyer, the "promisor," had promised the testator, the "promisee," that he would draft a will that would successfully benefit the intended legatee.

The appeal of these arguments is that the legatee would otherwise have no basis to remedy the real harm that occurred to her unless the court embraced at least one of these arguments. After all, in the instance of a lost legatee, the estate has not been damaged, that is, it has sustained no net loss or gain to its balance sheet; the assets in question would simply be inherited by someone else or by some other entity. Therefore, the estate has no basis to assert a malpractice claim against the lawyer.

The Supreme Court rejected adoption of the California rule, finding it "unworkable, and [that it] has led to ad hoc determinations and inconsistent results as the California courts have attempted to refine the broad Lucas rule." But the court did accept the third-party beneficiary argument, holding that it applies "where the intent to benefit is clear and the promisee [testator] is unable to enforce the contract." Obviously, since the testator would be dead when the legatee has sustained the harm, the testator would not be in a position to enforce the contract.

Guy involved an instance where the intended third-party beneficiary is beyond doubt because she was expressly named in the will. But, as the court noted in a footnote, there may be unnamed beneficiaries under a will who may be either intended or unintended beneficiaries for whom the "standing requirement may or may not be met." Under such circumstances, the court indicated that "the trial court must determine whether it would be 'appropriate' and whether the circumstances indicate an intent to benefit non-named beneficiaries. ... In making that determination the trial court should be certain the intent is clear."

But the court's observation in the footnote in Guy is dicta because the legatee there was expressly named in the will. To enjoy intended third-party-beneficiary status, must the beneficiary have been expressly named in the will? The Superior Court considered that issue recently in Estate of Agnew v. Ross, 110 A.3d 1020 (Pa. Super. 2015); Petition for Allowance of Appeal granted, ___ A.3d ___ (2015).

Agnew involved a situation where the client had executed a will, but he had failed to execute a trust amendment prepared by his lawyer at the same time. The trust amendment provided that "the assets of the Revocable Trust were to be distributed equally to [his nieces and nephews]." He died before his lawyer realized that he had failed to present the trust amendment to his client for signature. A copy of that document had been provided to the client, but there is no evidence that he had ever signed it.

The nephews and nieces and the estate sued the lawyer and his firm. It was what they were to receive under the trust amendment — apparently never signed — and not what they were to receive under the will — that was signed — that provided the basis for their claim against the lawyer. In their complaint they asserted claims sounding in breach of contract, negligence and respondeat superior as against the firm. The trial court sustained preliminary objections on the basis that the estate was an improper party, against one of the nieces in her representative capacity of the estate and with respect to the negligence count due to the absence of an attorney/client relationship. The trial court later granted summary judgment in favor of the lawyer and his firm based upon a finding that none of the nephews and nieces qualified as intended third-party beneficiaries so as to give them a basis to assert a claim.

The trial court had relied upon Gregg v. Lindsay, 649 A.2d 935 (Pa.Super. 1994), a non-precedential decision, as the basis for its ruling. Gregg was non-precedential because one judge wrote the opinion, but the other two judges on the panel merely concurred with the result. In Gregg, the lawyer who was engaged by the would-be legatee drafted the will naming the would-be legatee and went to the hospital to meet with the would-be testator, who approved the will but could not sign it because there was no one available to witness the signature. When the lawyer returned the next day he learned that his client had been moved to another hospital, where the client died before he could sign the will. The Superior Court reversed a verdict against the lawyer because "there was no executed will which ... could clearly establish an intent by the testator to benefit the third person."

In Agnew, the court in effect rejected the holding in Gregg and instead focused on the footnote in Guy that recognized that intended third-party-beneficiary status could be recognized even in the absence of a document signed by the testator (or settlor) so long as the proof of the intention was clear, direct and precise. Accordingly, the Superior Court reversed the trial court.

Apparently the Superior Court's decision will not be the last consideration of that case. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has granted Agnew's petition for allowance of appeal to determine whether the Superior Court erred and acted contrary to the Supreme Court's decision in Guy and to the Superior Court's previous decision in Gregg and its two other reported decisions.

Previously published in Pennsylvania Bar News • October 19 2015

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions