ARTICLE
2 November 2015

Business Judgment Standard Applied In Merger Following Corwin Decision

PF
Pierson Ferdinand LLP

Contributor

Pierson Ferdinand strives to provide excellent legal counsel and representation to clients worldwide from 20+ key markets in the US and UK. We specialize in handling complex legal matters and providing solutions to our clients' most pressing needs. Our lawyers come from top global law firms, including Am Law-ranked, regional and boutique law firms, federal and state government careers, and senior in-house counsel roles.
Under the reasoning of Corwin, the Court of Chancery found that the Board's actions were not grossly negligent.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the recent decision of In re Zale Corporation Stockholders Litigation, C.A. No. 9388-VCP (Del. Ch. Oct. 29, 2015), the Court of Chancery reversed its prior decision in the same case as a result of the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision, Corwin, et al. v. KKR Financial Holdings LLC, et al., C.A. No. 629, 2014 (Del. Oct. 2, 2015).  The Corwin  decision held that the business judgment standard of review applies when a merger is approved by a disinterested board and a majority of the fully informed stockholders.  Under the reasoning of Corwin, the Court of Chancery found that the Board’s actions were not grossly negligent.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More