United States: Consensus Among FTC Commissioners On Green Claims Appears To Be Biodegrading

Last Updated: November 2 2015
Article by Leonard L. Gordon

On Monday, the FTC Commissioners issued an opinion and Final Order, finding that ECM BioFilms, Inc. ("ECM") made false, misleading, and unsubstantiated environmental claims about its chemical additive product.  According to the FTC's Complaint filed in October 2013, ECM's advertisements and marketing materials claimed its product would cause plastics using its additive to: (i) biodegrade in a landfill within nine months to five years; and (ii) make the product biodegradable.  The Complaint also alleged that ECM made deceptive establishment claims and that ECM provided the means and instrumentalities to its customers to make deceptive statements to consumers about finished products.  We've written previously about similar challenges to biodegradability.  What makes this opinion notable is the disagreement among the Commission about what claims can be inferred from an unqualified claim that a product is biodegradable, the reliability of a relatively new survey methodology, and what the "significant minority" language in the FTC's Policy Statement on Deception (the "Deception Statement") means in the context of extrinsic evidence.

In its opinion, the Commission affirmed Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell's Initial Decision that ECM made deceptive biodegradability claims that plastics treated with its additive will completely biodegrade within nine months to five years and that ECM encouraged its customers to pass on these deceptive claims to consumers.  However, upon its own examination of the evidence, the Commission reversed the ALJ and held that ECM also made implied claims that were false and unsubstantiated regarding how plastics treated with ECM's product will biodegrade within a reasonably short period of time, or within one to five years by making a general biodegradability claim.  The ALJ had found that the FTC failed to produce sufficient extrinsic evidence that ECM's marketing made such implied claims. 

Both the ALJ's findings and Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen's partial dissent question the majority's interpretation of the evidence presented.  First, in a footnote, Commissioner Ohlhausen identifies how the majority addressed a different question than the ALJ regarding the implied claim of how long until complete degradation.  Specifically, she points out how the majority interpreted ECM's implied claim to mean that plastics treated with its product will completely decompose within five years, while the ALJ held that FTC Counsel failed to prove that ECM had impliedly claimed complete decomposition within one year.

Second, the ALJ and Commissioner Ohlhausen argued that the Google consumer survey relied on by the FTC's expert was methodologically flawed.  The Google survey tool was a relatively new survey instrument.  The sixty-question survey contained variations of questions that asked respondents how much time they thought certain products, some labeled "biodegradable," would take to decompose.  The ALJ rejected the reliability of the Google survey, finding that it: (i) did not comport with "generally accepted standards for survey research"; (ii) departed from legal standards FTC used; and (iii) was an unreliable foundation upon which to draw any material conclusions.

The majority recognized the survey as "experimental" and a "relatively new" tool, but found that it supported the position that attaching "biodegradable" to plastic products leads consumers to believe that the product will biodegrade within five years.  In support of its reliance on the survey evidence, the majority found ECM's arguments attacking the survey's credibility unpersuasive, and added that the questions were clear and not improperly leading, and accepted how the survey results were coded and analyzed.  Meanwhile, Commissioner Ohlhausen's dissent stressed how the survey has "no track record in litigation," has "little history in academic research," and has not produced any demographic information for approximately thirty percent of the respondents.

Third, Commissioner Ohlhausen also disagreed with the majority's use of the survey evidence ECM's expert presented.  The majority agreed that this survey supported FTC Counsel's position that a "significant minority" of consumers would believe that if a product is labeled "biodegradable," it will decompose within a reasonably short period of time.  Commissioner Ohlhausen attacked the credibility of this survey because it lacked an experimental control group, which is particularly important to distinguish between preexisting consumer misunderstanding about plastic biodegradability from any consumer misunderstanding ECM's claim caused.  The majority countered, stating that no case law exists that requires separating an advertisement's meaning from preexisting beliefs.  Furthermore, putting aside the methodological flaws in both consumer surveys, Commissioner Ohlhausen found the survey data inconclusive. She even warned the Commission to "be cautious in placing too much confidence in a methodology where the results appear to depend quite heavily on how the questions are asked, rather than on consumer opinion."

According to Commissioner Ohlhausen, another flaw in the majority's opinion was its misapplication of the Deception Statement.  Under the Deception Statement, an alleged interpretation of advertising materials must be reasonable, and it is reasonable when that interpretation is held by the "average listener," the "typical buyer," or the "general populace."  The majority found that the polled individuals were "average or ordinary members" of the public and thus are "reasonable consumers."  As a result, the majority argued that because the surveys showed a "significant minority" of respondents found ECM's implied claim as deceptive, the interpretation was reasonable.  Commissioner Ohlhausen disagreed, arguing that the majority incorrectly relied on the reasonableness of the survey respondent herself rather than whether her interpretation was reasonable.  Under her reading, the Deception Statement provides that a claim interpretation is not reasonable merely because it is held by a "significant minority" of consumers and that if so, it would "swallow the 'average listener,' the 'typical buyer,' and the 'general populace' rule."  She also argued that the FTC has never used extrinsic evidence of a "significant minority," alone to determine whether a claim's interpretation was reasonable.  The majority addressed this counterpoint citing case law that Commissioner Ohlhausen allegedly found inappropriate.  Furthermore, because the majority "[chose] the upper range of outcomes at nearly every turn," Commissioner Ohlhausen found that the majority's interpretation of the "significant minority" standard "facilitates cherry-picking data rather than considering results as a whole."  This disagreement over what the "significant minority" standard means bears watching, especially in cases where the FTC seeks disgorgement for all sales based on evidence that a minority of consumers may have been misled.

Finally, the decision sheds light on the utility of the FTC's Green Guides in its enforcement, as well as to how marketers interpret these guidelines.  The ALJ's findings show that ECM changed its marketing after the revised Green Guides were issued by omitting references to a biodegradation rate of "9 months to 5 years."  The Commission then found that ECM biodegradable claim to be implied.  The majority even stated in a footnote that its decision regarding ECM's implied claim "may raise certain broader issues about the Commission's Green Guides."  Commissioner Ohlhausen recognized this issue, stating that the guidelines are "based on anemic, flawed evidence" about underlying consumer beliefs.  This dialogue seems like an opening by those willing to litigate with the FTC over Green Claims about the validity of the consumer perception data that supposedly underlies the Green Guides.

The opinion continues the losing streak of respondents in administrative litigation before the FTC, which approximates that of the Washington Generals.  Commissioner Ohlhausen's critique of the somewhat convoluted reasoning that the majority goes through to find for FTC Counsel on every aspect of the case might be a roadmap for an appeal.  It also will be curious to see if the Commission is accepting of survey data respondents offer in future cases, particularly if that data uses the same methodology the Commission accepted here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions