Worldwide: International Remedies For Foreign Investors In Croatia And Poland: Mortgage And Consumer Loan Conversion Legislation

As a result of new mortgage and consumer loan conversion legislation in Croatia and Poland, foreign investors in the financial sectors of those countries may soon suffer substantial losses. Many of those affected investors, however, may be entitled to compensation under Croatia's and Poland's numerous bilateral investment treaties ("BITs"). This Commentary provides an overview of the proposed legislative changes in Croatia and Poland, and describes the international remedies that may be available to investors seeking shelter from their effects.

Overview of the New Legislation

Since the early 2000s, some Eastern European countries, including Croatia and Poland, have permitted banks and other financial institutions to issue mortgages and consumer loans denominated in Swiss francs ("CHF") as an alternative to doing so in local currency. CHF-denominated loans were attractive because they offered lower rates than those issued in local currency.1 Croatia has approximately 55,000 CHF-denominated loans outstanding. Most of these loans were taken in the early 2000s for mortgages or purchases of commercial property. 2 According to the Croatian national bank, the value of these loans is 23.1 billion kuna, which is the equivalent of US$3.38 billion. 3 CHF-denominated mortgages account for 38 percent of all mortgages in Croatia. 4 Likewise, between 2007 and 2008, more than 500,000 Poles took out home loans denominated in CHF, hoping to benefit from low interest rates.

In January of this year, however, Switzerland eliminated its cap on the CHF; consequently, that currency quickly began to surge. As a result, debtors holding CHF-denominated loans in Croatia and Poland have seen a drastic increase in the amount of local currency they need to pay to their creditors in order to satisfy their CHF-denominated loans.

The governments of Croatia and Poland have proposed legislation to address this developing situation. The Croatian government enacted a special law freezing the exchange rate for these loans, for a year, at 6.39 kuna per CHF, which is below the current market rate of 6.88 kuna per CHF yet still higher than the prevailing rates when most loans were taken out. 5 In September 2015, the Croatian government proposed a change to consumer credit laws in order to enforce conversion of CHF-denominated loans into euros. The law became effective at the end of September 2015. 6 Under this conversion law, banks will absorb the full cost of conversion, although they may be partly compensated through tax deductions. 7 Croatia's conversion law likely will have a retroactive effect. According to the European Central Bank ("ECB"), "the purpose of the law is to place borrowers of CHF loans in the position that they would have been in had their loans, from inception, been denominated in Euros [or Kuna]." 8 Additionally, the ECB is of the view that "the retroactive effect of the law is not in line with the general aim and principle of Directive 2014/17/EU," 9 which "allows Member States to further regulate foreign currency loans, on the condition that such regulation is not applied with retroactive effect." 10 The ECB therefore noted that if the draft law is introduced with retroactive effect, it would "undermine legal certainty." 11

In Poland, the lower house of Parliament passed a draft law that would convert all CHF-denominated mortgage loans to zlotys with the exchange rate of the CHF recorded on the day of the conversion. The bill provided that banks would take on 90 percent of the costs of such conversions. On September 8, 2015, however, the upper house of Parliament voted to amend the bill on conversion of CHF-denominated mortgages into zlotys so that the costs would be shared 50–50 by banks and mortgage holders. As a result, the bill has been sent back to the lower house for further discussion and a vote. Regardless of whether the bill that is ultimately passed includes a 50 percent or a 90 percent cost burden on financial institutions, the effect on banks will be substantial.

The Financial Impact of the Legislative Changes

The banking sector in both Croatia and Poland is composed mostly of foreign banks that own local banks or have a local branch. For example, more than 90 percent of all local banks in Croatia are owned by parent banks in the European Union. 12 Similarly, around 60 percent of Poland's banking sector is owned by foreign groups.

Foreign-owned Croatian banks hold a large portion of the 55,000 CHF-denominated loans outstanding in Croatia. According to Croatia's central bank, the cost of the conversion to these banks will be "tangibly higher" than the originally assessed US$895 million. 13 Polish banks hold Swiss franc portfolios worth nearly 144 billion zlotys, which is equivalent to 8 percent of the country's GDP. The National Bank of Poland estimated the losses incurred by banks due to the Polish bill at 21 billion zlotys (US$5.6 billion). Consequently, in the best case scenario, assuming that Poland's final bill provides for half of a restructured CHF loan to be written off by banks and the other half to be repaid by borrowers, the cost to banks would amount to nearly 10 billion zlotys (US$2.25 billion). But, if the final bill holds banks responsible for 90 percent of the conversion costs, the estimated cost to banks would be 20 billion zlotys, or nearly US$5.5 billion.

Whether the banks are asked to assume 50 percent, 90 percent, or 100 percent of the loan conversion cost, the legislative changes would still have a negative impact on the profitability and value of their investments in Croatia's and Poland's banking sector. Past experience in investor–state arbitration shows that foreign investors negatively affected by currency conversion policies may have recourse under international law. For example, Argentina's policy of "pesification" of its financial liabilities, through the termination of the currency board that had pegged the peso to the U.S. dollar, negatively affected the value of investments owned by foreign investors, and resulted in more than 40 arbitrations against Argentina. 14 Several of these arbitrations have culminated in awards in favor of the foreign investors. 15 Accordingly, foreign investors in Croatia and Poland likely will have recourse to international remedies through investor–state arbitration as provided by the available BITs.

What Are the International Remedies?

Investor–state arbitration is an attractive option for aggrieved investors. This regime provides a specialized and neutral forum in which to bring disputes against a state for its sovereign acts. It is often not necessary to exhaust local remedies or to commence any domestic litigation before bringing an investor–state arbitration. However, an investor's ability to bring a claim may depend upon the ownership structure of the affected investment vehicle.

Some investors will have recourse through BITs. Poland has 60 BITs in force and Croatia has 47, notably with capital-exporting states such as the Netherlands, Austria, Germany, Spain, the United States, and Italy. 16 BITs are designed to promote and protect investments by investors of the other state party to the treaty. Most BITs protect a broad range of investments, which encompass all assets. Foreign groups operating banks in Poland and Croatia typically hold shares in a locally incorporated branch or have acquired a local preexisting bank17—such investments are likely to fall within the protection of investment treaties. Foreign financial institutions that have issued CHF-denominated mortgages in Poland or other loans in Croatia, but that do not have a physical presence in those countries, might also benefit from investment treaty protections if the relevant treaty includes loans and claims to money as covered investments. 18

Access to arbitration under a particular treaty will depend upon an investor's nationality in one of the signatory states. In this context, nationality is typically determined by the claimant's place of citizenship and/or incorporation. Many BITs permit investors to make claims for directly or indirectly held investments as well as minority shareholdings. Thus, parent companies or individual shareholders are often able to assert rights relating to an investment held through a subsidiary company. Some treaties also provide that juridical persons incorporated in the host state but controlled by nationals of the other contracting state may be treated as foreign nationals for the purpose of making an investment arbitration claim.

There are a number of substantive protections provided under BITs as well. The fair and equitable treatment standard is the most frequently invoked standard in investment disputes and is likely to be the strongest claim in the type of dispute explained above. The standard is fact-specific and may be breached by a state's actions or omissions that violate the investor's legitimate expectations relied upon by the investor to make the investment. 19 The investor's legitimate expectations can be based on the host state's legal framework, contractual undertakings, and any undertakings and representations made explicitly or implicitly by the host state; changes in the legal framework may also be considered breaches if they represented a reversal of assurances made by the host state to the foreign investor. For example, the retroactive effect of Croatia's draft law would, at least according to an opinion by the ECB, offend the principle of legitimate expectations and likely support any fair and equitable treatment claim. 20

Investors who have seen their entire investment wiped out, or almost entirely wiped out, might also have recourse to the protection against illegal expropriation. Most BITs require that the expropriation of foreign-owned property must be: (i) for a public purpose; (ii) nondiscriminatory; (iii) in accordance with due process; and (iv) accompanied by prompt, adequate, and effective compensation equivalent to the fair market value of the expropriated investment before the expropriation became known. A government measure that did not comport with these requirements would constitute an expropriation if it effectuated a permanent loss of the economic value of an investment.

Host governments also are required, under international law, to provide full protection and security to the foreign investor and/or its investment. Traditionally, these protections referred mostly to the physical protection of an investment against interference by the use of force. This interpretation, however, has evolved to include the legal protection of the investment as well. 21 Changes in the legal framework likewise may breach the full protection and security protection if they drastically alter the legal framework for the investments resulting in the destabilizing of the investment. Some BITs may also contain an umbrella clause that guarantees the observance of obligations assumed by the host state vis-à-vis the investor or his investment.

There are many advantages to investor–state arbitration. Successful claimants are typically awarded monetary compensation, which in some cases not only includes the amount invested (plus interest, costs, and expenses) but also lost future profits. Arbitral awards are binding on the parties and create an obligation to comply with them. Most states comply with international arbitration awards voluntarily. In the event a party fails to comply with an award, one of the major advantages of arbitration (as opposed to litigation) is the international enforceability of arbitral awards as compared with foreign court judgments.

It is also worth noting that the European Commission ("EC") has sought to intervene in an increasing number of investor–state claims brought by EU nationals against member states. Indeed, the EC has voiced opposition to intra-EU BITs, i.e., BITs between EU member states, and, recently, went as far as initiating infringement proceedings against Austria, the Netherlands, Romania, Slovakia, and Sweden, requesting them to terminate their intra-EU BITs. 22

In one case, the EC even issued an injunction barring a member state—Romania—from paying the award in the Micula v. Romania ICSID case23 on the ground that such payment would constitute illegal state aid under EU law. 24 That injunction is likely to remain in place until the EC rules on the ultimate compatibility of that aid with the European single market. While the final outcome of the EC's intervention remains hard to predict and would certainly complicate an arbitration, it is by no means a bar to bringing a claim. In 2014, 16 percent of all investor–state arbitrations brought globally were intra-EU in nature, 25 and, in any event, measures such as those taken by the EU are of limited practical concern because most BITs contain termination clauses confirming that their terms will continue in effect for a number of years following termination.

This remains a rapidly evolving and contentious area, although there is little doubt that many investors in the financial sector will be adversely affected by the new conversion bills in Poland and Croatia. Investor–state arbitration is a possible avenue to address these likely losses.


1.Jasmina Kuzmanovic, "Banks Prepare to Sue Croatia Over Swiss Franc Loans Law," Bloomberg Business, Sept. 14, 2015.

2."Croatia Plans to Convert Swiss Franc Loans into Euros," Reuters, Sept. 10, 2015.

3.Jasmina Kuzmanovic, "Banks Prepare to Sue Croatia Over Swiss Franc Loans Law," Bloomberg Business, Sept. 14, 2015. Exchange rate as of Sept. 21, 2015 (1 kuna = US$0.15).



6."Croatia Plans to Convert Swiss Franc Loans into Euros," Reuters, Sept. 10, 2015. According to reports by Bloomberg Business and Reuters, the new changes to the Croatian law became effective on Sept. 30, 2015. See Jasmina Kuzmanovic, "Croatia Bolsters Bank Funds, Aids Kuna before Franc-Loans Switch," Bloomberg Business, Sept. 30, 2015; "Croatia Central Bank Provides Liquidity for Swiss Franc Loan Swap," Reuters, Sept. 30, 2015. As of date of publication of this Commentary, the Croatian authorities had yet to confirm whether this was, in fact, the case.


8.Opinion of the European Central Bank of 18 September 2015 on the conversion of Swiss franc loans (CON/2015/32), at § 1.2.




12."Croatia Plans to Convert Swiss Franc Loans into Euros," Reuters, Sept. 10, 2015.


14.See generally William W. Burke-White, "The Argentine Financial Crisis: State Liability Under BITs and the Legitimacy of the ICSID System," Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository, Jan. 24, 2008.

15.See, e.g., CMS Gas Transmission Co. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award, May 12, 2005; LG&E Energy Corp. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. Arb/02/1, Decision on Liability, Oct. 3, 2006; Enron Corp. Ponderosa Asset, L.P. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. Arb/01/3, Award, May 22, 2007; Sempra Energy Int'l v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. Arb/02/16, Award, Sept. 28, 2007.

16.See UNCTAD, Investment Policy Hub. Notably, the Croatia–Italy BIT was terminated in 2013. However, Article 13 of the BIT provides that it continues in force for 10 years from the date of termination. In this case, the BIT would remain in force until June 11, 2023.

17.Sylvester Kozak, "Consolidation within the Single European Financial System in 2003-2013," NBP Working Paper No. 166, at 37-38.

18.See Fedax N.V. v. Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, July 11, 1997, ¶¶ 31-37 (applying a broad interpretation to the term "investment" and finding that, under the applicable BIT, loans and other credit facilities constitute covered investments); but see Salini Construttori S.p.A. and Italstrade A.p.A. v. Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/13, Decision on Jurisdiction, Nov. 29, 2004, ¶¶ 52-54 (enumerating a list of characteristics that an investment must possess in order to be considered a covered investment, mainly: "contributions, certain duration of performance of the contract and a participation in the risks of the transaction"); Romak S.A. v. Republic of Uzbekistan, PCA Case No. AA280, Award, Nov. 26, 2009, ¶ 207 (the tribunal agreed with the Salini tribunal and applied a narrow interpretation of the term "investment" even where the definition of "investment" included "claims to money").

19.The FET standard may also be breached by (i) conduct that is not transparent or consistent and creates an unstable or unpredictable legal framework or business environment for the investment; (ii) conduct that violates due process or results in a denial of justice; (iii) discriminatory action; (iv) interference with a contract; (v) bad faith; or (vi) harassment or coercion.

20.See Opinion of the European Central Bank of Sept. 18, 2015 on the conversion of Swiss franc loans (CON/2015/32), at § 3.2.2.

21.See Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award, July 14, 2006, ¶ 408 (where "protection and security" is qualified by "full," the standard extends beyond physical security).

22.See European Commission Press Release, "Commission asks Member States to terminate their intra-EU bilateral investment treaties," June 18, 2015.

23.Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, S.C. European Food S.A, S.C. Starmill S.R.L. and S.C. Multipack S.R.L. v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20, Final Award, Dec. 11, 2013.

24.See Luke Eric Peterson, "European Commission Enjoins Romania from Paying ICSID Award, Thus Throwing a Wrench into Enforcement of Intra-EU BIT Ruling," IAReporter, Aug. 7, 2014.


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions