ARTICLE
29 October 2015

Yates Memo Discussed At Pharmaceutical Compliance Congress

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
We provided an overview of the Yates Memo here, and highlighted subsequent DOJ remarks on the memo here.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

As readers of Health Law and Policy Matters know, we have covered recent developments in the Department of Justice's (DOJ's) commitment to prosecuting individuals involved in corporate misconduct.  A flurry of activity on this issue erupted after a Deputy Attorney General (DAG) in the DOJ named Sally Quinlan Yates published a memorandum in September. Known as the "Yates Memo," the memo sets forth certain steps that the DOJ will take during investigation of corporate misconduct to ensure that individuals involved in the misconduct are held responsible. We provided an overview of the Yates Memo here, and highlighted subsequent DOJ remarks on the memo here.

The DOJ is continuing to clarify and expound on the Yates Memo. On October 22, 2015, Benjamin C. Mizer, the Principal DAG  responsible for the DOJ's Civil Division, spoke at the 16th Pharmaceutical Compliance Congress and Best Practices Forum in Washington, D.C. In his speech, Mizer focused on a number of points made in the Yates Memo, including the steps that corporations must take to receive cooperation credit, stating in part "...no partial credit for cooperation that doesn't include information about individuals." Mizer went on to discuss other aspects of the Yates Memo. Our colleague, Bridget Rohde, has published a post outlining Mizer's remarks and their potential implications on DOJ's approach to corporate investigations. Her post can be found here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More