United States: Venable's $20-Million-Plus-Sanctions Trade Secrets Win For Government Contractor: What It Means For You

Last Updated: October 22 2015
Article by Douglas B. Mishkin and Douglas C. Proxmire

Your Vice President of Business Development resigns. The next thing you know, a new business opportunity that would have been yours inexplicably goes to a competitor – inexplicably, that is, until you learn that the competitor is working with your former Vice President in violation of his noncompetition agreement with you and is using your trade secrets courtesy of your former Vice President.

When this happened to our client, we filed suit and won a judgment for $20-million-plus-sanctions. We proved that the former employee stole a recent successful government contract proposal, Statements of Work and pricing information among thousands of stolen files; gave them to the competitor, who copied them (typos and all) into a proposal that the former Vice President helped the competitor prepare; and the competitor submitted the proposal to the U.S. government, knowing our client's trade secrets contained in the proposal would position the competitor to receive contract award.

This 42-day trial was full of issues that every employer, and particularly every government contractor, should learn from to protect their interests and their trade secrets. We will highlight three of those issues:

  1. Metadata is meta-important. Trade secret cases are largely about unwinding who had what documents; when they had them; who they gave them to; how they were manipulated and what they did with them. No victim of a theft of trade secrets can begin to address these questions without understanding metadata. Metadata can be understood as pieces of information that describe an electronic file. Metadata may reveal who authored a file, and when the file was created, opened, edited or printed.

In our case, the competitor's defense hinged largely upon one document (the "Sham Document") that the competitor claimed exonerated it from misappropriating our client's trade secrets. The competitor and the former Vice President tried to convince the Court that the Sham Document constituted a proposal the defendant was preparing to submit to a foreign government before the U.S. Government opportunity was publically advertised. The existence of the Sham Document at the time of the events in question supposedly showed that the defendant was not misappropriating our client's trade secrets to steal a U.S. government contract opportunity from our client but rather was engaged in preparing an innocent proposal seeking an opportunity that our client had no plans to pursue. Metadata proved the Sham Document was, well, a sham. In fact, the defendant created the Sham Document only after the litigation began to cover up the defendant's misappropriation of our client's trade secrets. How did we prove that?

First, the Sham Document contained a "temporal anomaly." The anomaly was that the metadata showed a "Last Saved Date" that was earlier than the "Last Printed Date." Experts for both sides agreed: when Microsoft Word prints a document, the Last Saved Date must be on or after the Last Printed Date. The defendant's own expert testified that the anomaly "can be indicative of backdating" that can occur "where the system clock associated with the computer is for some reason set to the wrong date, whether it's intentional or not. And then there are tools that are specifically designed for modification of metadata dates."

Second, the Sham Document bore a File System Created Date on the defendant's server that was long after the underlying events at issue in the lawsuit, after litigation had begun. This "File System Created Date" was compelling evidence establishing that the defendant had not been working on the Sham Document when it said it was (i.e., the innocent explanation), but instead created the Sham Document after the defendant knew that it had been sued for misappropriation.

Finally, we used metadata to prove that the defendant had backdated other files. Litigation-related documents that the defendant received in late September bore "Last Written Dates" in August. Similarly, post-August emails contained in an .OLM file had a "Last Written Date" in August– this was impossible. Two defense forensic experts said these anomalies suggested that someone had used a tool to backdate these files. One said that "a tool could have been used to change these [Last Written Dates] so that they were, you know, screwy." Our expert testified that "you can set those dates to anything you want. Once you're using tools, all bets are off. You can make the dates dance and sing any way you want."

The judge noted all of this in concluding that the Sham Document was a "fraud." In addition to assessing compensatory and exemplary damages against the defendant, the judge said that the defendant's law firm should have known from the metadata that the Sham Document defense was a fraud. As a result, the judge imposed sanctions against the law firm for continuing to assert the defense in spite of the metadata that disproved the authenticity of the Sham Document.

  1. Compilations of public information may be protectable as a trade secret. Odd though it may seem, some trade secrets include public information. Under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), a "compilation" of information may be a trade secret as long as it:
  • Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use.
  • Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.

Businesses frequently invest considerable resources in compiling public and proprietary information for all kinds of purposes – to enhance marketing campaigns, to respond to RFPs, to improve corporate performance. Any particular piece of that publicly-available information is not a trade secret. But when putting forth the effort to find, organize and present the information to create a product and when that work product provides a competitive advantage, and the business work product is not easily ascertainable, the end result may well be a trade secret. In our case, the defendant tried to justify its misappropriation of our client's government contract proposal by saying that the proposal was simply a collection of publicly-available information, and thus the proposal was not a trade secret. Through the testimony of those that crafter the proposal, we persuaded the judge that the misappropriated proposal represented six years of our client's effort in developing, improving and refining the proposal. Drafting the proposal required finding and reviewing massive amounts of publicly-available information, making judgment calls about what information to use, and then distilling that information into proposal-appropriate tidbits that communicated the end product that our client offered. The judge found that our client's investment in compiling this information "provided the company with the competitive advantage necessary for trade secret protection."

  1. Preserving documents and electronic storage devices is essential. The judge awarded our client millions of dollars in punitive damages against the defendant, and millions of dollars in attorneys' fees as sanctions against the defendant and its law firm. Some of the most egregious sanctionable conduct included:
  • The defendant "scrubbed" its server and key computers during the trial, shortly before these devices were to be imaged. The defendant used two evidence deletion tools that not only delete files, but also delete evidence that the files have been deleted. The judge wrote that "[t]he court has rarely, if ever in a civil matter, witnessed a party engage in such flagrant misconduct and act with such complete disregard for the truth and such profound disrespect for the law."
  • The defendant's law firm mishandled various pieces of electronic evidence. The firm could not identify what laptop, hard drive or thumb drive it received from its client, or when. The firm opened certain electronic files, thereby altering their all-important metadata, and in so doing erased evidence.
  • The defendant's law firm failed to disclose that it had certain pieces of electronic evidence in its possession.
  • The defendant repeatedly failed to produce documents in its possession, and repeatedly misrepresented to the court that no such documents existed.

Employers understandably fear the prospect of their most valuable assets – personnel and intellectual property – marching out the door. Prudent employers can address that fear by understanding issues like these, by training their employees as to their obligations and by working with counsel who can guide them through these crises.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions