United States: New York Court Rules (Sort Of) On Whether Electricity Is A Good Or A Service

Last Updated: October 13 2015
Article by   Orrick

It seems only fitting that recent decisions by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and its bankruptcy court regarding the nature of electricity should have sent, at least initially, a jolt through the energy community. Perhaps the Southern District court would lead the charge for one side or the other in an ongoing debate over whether electricity constitutes goods or services—a controversy that has potentially far-reaching implications (in bankruptcy cases, concerning the priority of claims of electricity providers, and, in ordinary transactions, for the tort liability of electricity providers). In the end, however, the outcome of the litigation was something less than electrifying. Here's what happened.

After The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc., better known as A&P, filed its first chapter 11 petition at the end of 2010,[i] Hudson Energy Services sought to take advantage of section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code, which confers administrative priority over general unsecured claims on claims for "the value of any goods received by the debtor within 20 days before the date of the commencement of a case under this title in which the goods have been sold to the debtor in the ordinary course of such debtor's business." Asserting rights under section 503(b)(9), Hudson filed an administrative claim seeking payment of over $875,000 for electricity provided to A&P during the twenty days prior to its bankruptcy filing. The bankruptcy court denied Hudson's claim for priority on the grounds that electricity did not "clearly fall" within the meaning of "goods" for purposes of section 503(b)(9) and that, since administrative expense claims "must be tightly construed," [ii] it was not appropriate to grant administrative priority to a claim that did not "clearly fit within the statute's provisions."[iii] Hudson appealed to the district court.

The district court began its analysis by noting that, although section 503(b)(9) did not define "goods," there was "consensus" that the definition of "goods" under the UCC should apply. This, however, did not resolve the question in the case of electricity because, although "the majority of courts hold that electricity is a good under UCC Section 2-105(1), a strong minority—led by decisions of the New York Court of Appeals, the Second Circuit, and this Court—disagrees."[iv] The Second Circuit, for example, had stated flatly that the "UCC does not apply to sale of electricity which is a service under New York law."[v] One might have thought that a Second Circuit ruling would have ended the inquiry for the purposes of a New York bankruptcy case, but the A&P bankruptcy court took the view that, for purposes of section 503(b)(9), whether electricity was a good or a service was a question of "federal law" requiring a "uniform-throughout-the country analysis,"[vi] even though it based its analysis on UCC's definition of "goods," to wit: "Goods" means "all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid, investment securities (Article 8) and things in action."[vii]

On appeal, the district court accepted the bankruptcy court's formulation as the basis for the definition of goods under section 503(b)(9), but then sought to determine from the record of the bankruptcy proceedings below whether electricity qualified as "goods," or, specifically, whether electricity was still "movable" at the time it was "identified to the contract" for its sale. A&P argued that, on the issues of "movability" and "identification," an evidentiary hearing was unnecessary, that "electricity is a constant or legislative fact" that does "not vary from case to case."[viii] The district court disagreed: "while the physics of electricity may be constant, the instant case demonstrates that the economic or business arrangements for its delivery are not."[ix] Accordingly, the district court reversed the bankruptcy court's order and remanded so that the bankruptcy court could develop the factual record on the issues of movability and identification to the contract.

On remand, the bankruptcy considered conflicting expert testimony submitted by A&P and by Hudson regarding the metering of electricity usage. The bankruptcy court decided that, if the electricity was "identified" to the contract for its provision, that identification occurred when the use of the electricity was registered on a meter. On appeal, the district court agreed with this conclusion.[x] The question then became whether the electricity was still "moving" when the usage was registered by the meter or had ceased to be "moveable" at that point. Hudson argued that the electricity was still moving after it registered on the meter. Its expert testified that "it would take approximately 226 nanoseconds for electricity to travel from the meter to the end device where it is consumed" so that, in effect, for that period, about 226 nanoseconds, the electricity would have been both moveable and identified to the contract. The bankruptcy and district courts, however, accepted the contrary testimony of A&P's expert, who concluded that, because of the time it took for a meter to process and display information, "by the time the meter can actually identify the electricity that passes through it, the electricity has already reached its end-point and been consumed."[xi] In the view of the bankruptcy court (which the district court found to be not clearly erroneous), Hudson, in effect, lost this race to the endpoint by a matter of nanoseconds.

Recognizing the closeness of this factual contest, neither the bankruptcy court nor the district court actually held flat out that electricity was not a "good." Rather they agreed that "it is 'far from clear' that electricity falls within the meaning of goods under Section 503(b)(9)."[xii] They both acknowledged that there is a split of authority on the issue[xiii] but then used this split to bolster their conclusion that electricity should not be treated as a good—as a matter of bankruptcy policy. "Thus, where it is 'far from clear' that a claim falls within the Bankruptcy Code’s priority provisions, courts should 'reject [an] expanded interpretation..[u]nless and until Congress otherwise directs."[xiv] In the end, therefore, the A&P decisions are more about the nature of bankruptcy priorities than they are about the nature of goods under the UCC.

This will no doubt come as a disappointment to those who were hoping for clear guidance from the district court on the electricity goods-or-services issue. Still, there is probably something in the district court's opinion for everyone. For those who were hoping for a ruling that provision of electricity constitutes services, the A&P decisions provide considerable support, although the decisions stop short of an outright declaration to that effect. For those who were hoping for a ruling that electricity constitutes goods, to the extent the decisions turn on scientific evidence (which might later be challenged in a different forum) and on bankruptcy policy (no ill-advised expansion of bankruptcy priorities), the decisions leave open the door for further debate in other forums and in other contexts. But for everyone it is a reminder that bankruptcy courts don't only decide issues about the dischargeability of fraudulent debts and the reaffirmation of contracts to purchase used trucks—and of how surprisingly often important decisions of general business law are made in the context of a bankruptcy case.

[i] A&P filed its first chapter 11 petition on December 10, 2010 and confirmed a reorganization plan on February 28, 2012. The reorganized company filed a chapter 11 petition on July 19, 2015.

[ii] Quoting from the Supreme Court's decision in Howard Delivery Serv., Inc. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., 547 U.S. 651, 667, 126 Us. 2015, 165 L.Ed.2d 110 (2006).

[iii] Hudson Energy Services, LLC v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (In re The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.), 498 B.R. 19, 21 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (hereinafter cited a "Hudson I").

[iv] Hudson I at 22.

[v] Norcon Power Partners, L.P. v. Niagra Mohawk Power Corp., 163 F.3d 153, 155 (2d Cir. 1998).

[vi] Hudson I at 22.

[vii] Uniform Commercial Code section 2-105(1)

[viii] Hudson I at 30.

[ix] Id.

[x] Hudson Energy Services, LLC v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (In re The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.), 2015 WL 5662524 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (hereinafter cited as Hudson II) at *3.

[xi] Hudson II at *4.

[xii] Hudson II at*5.

[xiii] Id at *5. The District Court writes:

The divergent judicial opinions on the issue, compare In re Pilgrim's Pride Corp ., 421 B.R. at 239 & n. 8 (electricity not a good because "[o]nce [it] has been 'identified' by measurement at the meter, it has already been consumed by the end user;" "[i]t [would be] impossible for the consumer to return electricity to the provider after it has passed the meter point;" and "[i]t is difficult to imagine how electricity to be delivered could be identified at all before transmission to the customer"); In re Samaritan Alliance, LLC, No. 07–BK–50735, 2008 WL 2520107, at *4 (Bankr.E.D. Ky. June 20, 2008) (electricity not a good because "electricity provided is more properly characterized as a 'service' "), with In re Grede Foundries, 440 B.R. at 799–801 (affirming bankruptcy court holding that electricity a good because "an electric current is literally moving through the transmission network and continues to move until it is delivered to a customer at the time it is metered and consumed;" "metering satisfies the identification requirement of the UCC and the movement is sufficient to satisfy the movability requirement, even if it reaches the speed of light;" and "there is no principled distinction to be made" between electricity and natural gas or water, which are considered goods under the UCC definition) (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted); In re S. Mont. Elec. Generation & Transmission Coop., Inc., No. 11–BK–62031, 2013 WL 85162, at *4–5 (Bankr.D.Mont. Jan. 8, 2013) (electricity a good for reasons stated in In re Grede Foundries ); In re Erving Indus., 432 B.R. at 370 (electricity a good because "[it] does not simply reach a customer's meter and simultaneously cease to exist" but rather "passes through the meter" so that "it is literally moving [at the time it is identified to the contract], and it remains movable for some period of time … through the customer's electrical wiring until it is ultimately put to use") (emphasis in original), and the confounding questions of physical science at the heart of the dispute indicate that the question of whether electricity is a good is not clearly answered in the affirmative.

[xiv] Id., citing the Supreme Court's decision in Howard Delivery Services, surpa, n. ii.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.