United States: Design Patents - Design Patent Prosecution: It's Not The Same!

When you hear the terms "design patent" and "utility patent," the tendency may be to focus on the "patent" part and assume that design patents are mostly like utility patents.  While the two share some aspects, there are also many important differences.  But, those intellectual property (IP) practitioners— and clients—who treat design patent applications the same as utility patent applications can often find themselves making mistakes and creating issues that may harm their overall IP portfolio and strategy. 

In the United States, a single government agency, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), examines and issues utility patents, design patents, and trademarks.  But in many parts of the world this is not the case.  For instance, in the European Union, the European Patent Office deals with utility patents, while the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (known as OHIM) registers designs and trademarks.  As a result, designs and utility rights are treated much differently.  Moreover, while in the United States, Title 35 contains provisions for both types of patents, there are many design-specific provisions that do not apply to utility patents.  Finally, while some statutes, such as 35 U.S.C. § 112, which governs the specification, written description, and enablement, apply to both types of patents, the application of the requirements for clarity, for instance, apply quite differently in practice because utility patents generally deal in words, while design patents generally deal in drawings.

With this in mind, let's take a look at the Top Ten Differences between design and utility patents and why those differences matter.

Difference #10: Design patents protect the ornamental aspects of an article, not how the article is used or works. 

A design patent protects the ornamental aspects of an article of manufacture (i.e., an article with a function), while utility patents protect the way an article is used or works, or material that makes up the article.  The fact that an article works in a new and nonobvious way—the standard for patentability in a utility application—is not relevant against a rejection in a design application.  Instead, the overall visual impression of the article must be new and not an obvious variation of prior designs.  Thus, those who are prosecuting design patent applications need to become fluent in the language of describing the way something looks and how that design is different from the way that a prior art design looks.

Difference #9: Deadlines come up faster in the design world.

Provisional applications are not available for design protection, so any U.S. filing must be a complete nonprovisional application.  In addition, design applications are typically prepared after the production design has been frozen, which might be just before public disclosure, so the time to prepare the application is often limited.  Further, in order to claim the benefit of a foreign priority application under the Paris Convention,2 a design patent application must be filed in the United States within six months (as opposed to the usual twelve months available in utility patent applications).  The same is true for filing foreign applications that claim priority to a design patent application first filed in the United States.

As such, it is usually best to have a fully formed filing strategy for a design patent application (including a plan for foreign filing) at the beginning of the process, as there is less time built in to decide whether to apply for protection in additional countries once the foreign filing clock starts.

Difference #8: Generally, U.S. design patent applications are not published.

U.S. design patent applications are not published if the application is filed directly with the USPTO.  Moreover, if the application is not a divisional or continuation, then the prosecution history is not publicly available until (and if) the application issues.  As a result, it is harder for third parties to keep tabs on the design patent applications of others until such applications issue as patents.

There is one instance in which a U.S. design patent application will publish: if the application is filed as an International Design Application (also known as an IDA) via the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs.2  Under the Hague, the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO) publishes the IDA about six months after the date of international registration.  Generally, applicants may request deferment of publication of up to thirty months from the priority date (or from the filing date, if no priority is claimed).  However, deferment of publication is not permitted if the IDA designates the United States (or any other Contracting Party that does not permit deferred publication).  For more details on the Hague, check out last issue's article.

Difference #7: Design patents only have one claim—so you might need more than one.

Whereas few practitioners would file a utility patent with only one claim, those filing design patent applications have no choice.  Moreover, as noted below, restriction requirements are fairly common in design practice, so even if you start off with one application that matures into a patent, you may end up needing to file divisional applications to fully protect your design.  Sophisticated applicants will often make careful use of portion claiming, which means only claiming a portion of the design by depicting those parts in solid lines and leaving other portions of the design unclaimed by using broken (or dashed) lines.  Such techniques can help protect the innovative portions of a design and make it harder for copycats to "design around" your patent.

Difference #6: Since the claim is primarily the drawings, high-quality drawings are essential.

The single claim of a design patent always takes the same form:  " The ornamental design for [the article which embodies the design or to which it is applied] as shown and described."  Because the claim relies so heavily on the drawings, those drawings should be clear, accurate, and include all the views needed to sufficiently show the design at the time of filing.  Unlike utility filings where claim amendments are a regular part of the prosecution process, amendments in design applications, i.e., mainly to the drawings to, for example, correct lines or improve clarity, may be difficult to come by.  Those who are prosecuting design patent applications should be on good terms with a competent draftsperson and be incredibly careful when filing drawings with the USPTO to make sure that drawing quality is not compromised in the process.

Difference #5: Restriction is required and commonplace.

As noted above, a design patent application may only have one claim; however, more than one embodiment of a design may be protected by that single claim.  But be careful: those multiple embodiments must still cover a single inventive concept.  If this is not the case, and the examiner determines that the claim is referencing more than one patentably distinct design, restriction will be required.  Thus, divisional filings are also very common, leading to increased costs for applicants who may have to file multiple applications in order to fully protect a design.  Also, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has held that the act of electing an embodiment triggers prosecution history estoppel, so it is important to carefully consider this possibility when planning your filing strategy.

Difference #4: Continued prosecution applications (CPAs) are the norm.

Effective July 14, 2003, continued prosecution application (CPA) practice was eliminated as an option in utility applications; instead, applicants regularly file requests for continued examination (RCE) to get another bite at the apple and continue prosecuting a utility patent application after a final action.  But in design applications, RCEs are not allowed, so CPAs are still permitted. 

Legally, a CPA is a new application—and its parent application must be abandoned in favor of the CPA—which requires an applicant to once again meet all of the formal requirements of a new application and pay the basic filing fee.  Having to essentially file a new application in order to continue prosecution in a design application could be fertile ground for mistakes, especially in uploading appropriate drawings.  If these issues can be avoided, however, a CPA is not much different from an RCE in practice.  The CPA is usually assigned to the same examiner as the parent application, and prosecution continues from where it was left off. 

Difference #3: Design patent term is based on the issue date.  Thus, patent term adjustment is not necessary (or available).

When the term of utility patents was changed from seventeen years from issuance to twenty years from the filing date, the concept of patent term adjustment (PTA) was implemented to compensate applicants for any delays by the USPTO in handling a utility application.  But this change did not apply for design patents.

For applications filed on or after December 18, 2013, the term of a design patent is fifteen years from the date of grant.  This change—from a fourteen–year term—is another result of the implementation of the Hague Agreement.  Thus, although delays in prosecution are never desirable, such delays in a design application will not affect a patent's ultimate term.  Further, U.S. design patents do not require maintenance fees to maintain the patent in force. 

Difference #2: The USPTO charges less for design patents.

The following chart gives a snapshot of design patent application fees versus utility patent application fees as of September 2015.  Design patent application fees are significantly cheaper; however, additional costs may be incurred in the form of expert draftsmen fees and because often more than one application is needed to adequately protect a design.

Fee

Design (USD)

Utility (USD)

Basic Filing Fee

$180

$280

Search Fee

$120

$600

Examination Fee

$460

$720

CPA

$180*
*Basic filing fee

N/A

RCE

N/A

$1200 (1st request)
$1700 (2nd and later requests)

Issue Fee

$560

$960

Difference #1: Hiring a practitioner who regularly handles design patent application prosecution makes a difference.

Although design patent prosecution may be less expensive than utility prosecution, it is true that hiring patent prosecution counsel who is not familiar with design practice can increase those costs significantly while that attorney gets up to speed on the differences between utility and design prosecution.  Further, because of the shorter timelines and stricter application of some USPTO rules in design prosecution, hiring counsel who is not intimately familiar with design practice and procedures may end up costing more than additional money—it may cost valuable protection.

Footnotes

1. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, March 20, 1883,?available at http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=288514.

2. Under the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act (PLTIA) that took effect May 13, 2015, the United States joined the Hague Agreement.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
23 Sep 2018, Seminar, Chicago, United States

Finnegan is a sponsor of the Intellectual Property Owners Association Annual Meeting, supporting the Women in IP Networking Brunch.

26 Sep 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

This latest series of webinars will explore emerging trends in the changing intellectual property (IP) legal environment in Europe and the United States.

26 Sep 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

This latest series of webinars will explore emerging trends in the changing intellectual property (IP) legal environment in Europe and the United States.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions