United States: New Jersey Supreme Court Restricts Medical Malpractice Actions Against Uninsured Doctors But Expands Potential Liability Of Hospitals And Other Facilities

On September 29, 2015 the Supreme Court of New Jersey decided Jarrell v. Kaul, No. A‑42 (Sup.Ct. Sept. 29, 2015), a case that simultaneously restricts and expands theories of medical malpractice liability against healthcare providers.  Addressing three issues relating to the statutory requirement that physicians licensed to practice medicine in New Jersey must obtain and maintain medical malpractice liability insurance pursuant to N.J.S.A 45:9-19.17, the Court considered whether: (1) an injured patient may bring a direct action against a negligent, uninsured physician; (2) failure to comply with the statutory liability insurance requirement gives rise to an informed consent claim; and (3) a healthcare facility granting privileges to a physician to treat patients in its facility has a duty to determine and monitor the physician's compliance with the statutory malpractice insurance requirement.

Jarrell is a medical malpractice case in which plaintiff was treated by defendant Dr. Kaul, a board‑certified anesthesiologist who focused on pain management and minimally invasive spinal procedures.  Dr. Kaul saw patients and performed procedures at defendant Market Street Surgical Center ("MSSC").  Plaintiff saw Dr. Kaul for back pain that Dr. Kaul diagnosed as a herniated lumbar disc, lumbar radiculopathy, and discogenic back pain.  Dr. Kaul performed a spinal fusion procedure on plaintiff.  Following the surgery, plaintiff experienced new pain in his left side that worsened over time, eventually resulting in a drop foot, chronic pain, and limitations in his physical activities, which persisted even following a subsequent procedure by another doctor to address plaintiff's new symptoms.

Plaintiff and his wife sued Dr. Kaul and MSSC for malpractice in a multi-count Complaint that included several claims based upon Dr. Kaul's failure to maintain medical malpractice liability insurance as required by New Jersey statute, N.J.S.A. 45:9‑19.17.  Plaintiff also asserted a claim that defendant MSSC negligently and unreasonably facilitated performance of an unauthorized surgical procedure by a physician who was unqualified to perform the plaintiff's surgery based upon the physician's failure to carry the requisite minimum malpractice insurance.

After reviewing the legislative and regulatory history of the malpractice insurance requirement, the Supreme Court first addressed the question of whether an injured patient has a direct cause of action against a treating physician who does not comply with the statutory insurance requirements.  Noting that neither the statute nor its implementing regulations expressly provide a direct cause of action for an injured patient, the Court held that the legislative history and statutory language did not support either an express or implied private cause of action.

The Supreme Court explained that under New Jersey law, the Board of Medical Examiners ("BME") is charged with regulating the practice of medicine in New Jersey, and the state legislature "expressly concluded" that the BME "would be the most likely vehicle to ensure compliance with the liability insurance requirement."  Slip op. at 20.  As the Court explained: "Administrative oversight and enforcement is the declared enforcement mechanism and that choice reflects a legislative decision to encourage and force compliance rather than wait for a complaint by an injured patient that may never be filed."  Id.  The Supreme Court thus concluded that the statute, N.J.S.A. 45:9-19.17, does not expressly or implicitly recognize a direct cause of action by an injured patient against a physician who fails to obtain the requisite medical malpractice liability insurance.  Id.

Second, the Supreme Court addressed Plaintiff's informed consent theory, framing the question as "whether the absence of statutorily mandated medical malpractice liability insurance may be information that a reasonably prudent patient would consider material to his or her decision to proceed with the course of medical treatment or surgical procedure."  Id. at 22.  The Court reaffirmed prior case law holding that the doctrine of informed consent is based upon negligence concepts with a focus on risks pertaining to the specific proposed medical treatment:  "informed consent is predicated on the duty of the physician to disclose to the patient the information that will enable the patient to make a reasoned evaluation of the nature of the proposed treatment, any risks associated with it, and those risks associated with any alternative treatments."  Id. at 30 (citing Largey v. Rothman, 110 N.J. 204, 208 (1988)).

The absence of insurance, the Court explained, "bears no relation to the nature of the proposed medical course or to the risks attendant to a proposed procedure or treatment."  Id.  Further,

To be sure, a patient who has been injured due to negligent care by an uninsured physician has sustained a financial loss but such a loss is not the injury that the informed consent doctrine ever contemplated.  Applying the informed consent jurisprudence to the financial consequences of negligent care by an uninsured physician untethers the remedy from its theoretical underpinnings and is a stark departure from our prior jurisprudence.  We discern no principled reason to extend the additional and questionable relief that the informed consent doctrine may provide to an injured patient to address the financial insecurity of a physician.

Id. at 30‑31.  The Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of the informed consent claim.

Third, the Court addressed the negligence claim against MSSC premised upon its alleged failure to limit use of its facility only to those physicians who satisfy the statutory mandate to obtain and maintain a minimum level of medical malpractice liability insurance, a cause of action that the Court interpreted as a negligent hiring claim.  After citing the general rule that a party who engages an independent contractor is not liable for the contractor's negligence, the Court explained that the "incompetent contractor" exception under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 411 and applicable New Jersey case law applied to this claim, because the "basic element of competency" for any doctor seeking surgical privileges at MSSC is a license to practice medicine in New Jersey, and the "essential condition for such a license" is compliance with the medical malpractice liability insurance requirements.  Id. at 41.  Under New Jersey law, MSSC had "a duty to withhold privileges to any physician who did not meet the financial responsibility requirements for license to practice medicine" in New Jersey.  Id. at 41-42.

The Court noted that the record in the case demonstrated that an MSSC knew that Dr. Kaul had an insurance policy that expressly excluded plaintiff's surgical procedure, and did not include any evidence that the BME accepted Dr. Kaul's alleged representation (and defense to plaintiff's claim) that he possessed sufficient assets to satisfy the alternative letter of credit requirement, or that MSSC conducted any inquiry to confirm that the BME deemed such a representation compliant with the statutory requirements.  The Supreme Court concluded that there were genuine issues of fact on the record concerning MSSC's alleged negligence in granting or continuing Dr. Kaul's privileges under the circumstances, and reversed summary judgment entered in favor of MSSC on the negligent hiring claim asserted by plaintiffs.  Id. at 42-43.

The takeaways from Jarrell are a mixed bag for health care professionals.  On the one hand, Jarrell provides restrictions on medical malpractice claims against uninsured and insured doctors.  On a basic level, Jarrell holds that an injured patient does not have a direct cause of action against a physician who fails to obtain or maintain the statutorily required medical malpractice liability insurance or letter of credit in New Jersey.

Beyond this express ruling, Jarrell's analysis of the informed consent doctrine will be beneficial to insured as well as uninsured physicians because the case confirms that the scope of the informed consent doctrine under New Jersey law is limited to disclosure and discussion of information pertaining to the specific medical risks associated with proposed or alternative treatments being considered by the patient.   The Supreme Court explicitly rejected an expansive interpretation of the informed consent doctrine based upon a theory of fraud, misrepresentation, or omission of facts other than the risks to the patient attendant to the medical procedures or treatment.  Jarrell thus precludes expanding the informed consent doctrine to assert novel theories of liability against doctors and other healthcare providers based upon an alleged failure to disclose some information or fact other than the particular risks to the patient inherent in the proposed treatment alternatives.

On the other hand, Jarrell provides a basis for a potential theory of liability against a hospital, surgical center, or other facility that grants privileges to an uninsured doctor or fails to check regularly to confirm that its doctors maintain the requisite medical malpractice insurance.  Consequently, hospitals, surgical centers and other facilities operating in New Jersey should be sure that they have procedures and protocols in place to confirm initially as a prerequisite to granting of privileges, as well as periodically, that all doctors with privileges in their facility have and provide proof of malpractice insurance coverage in compliance with N.J.S.A 45:9-19.17 and related regulations.

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions