ARTICLE
30 September 2015

DOJ Clarifies Position On Individual Accountability In Corporate Investigations

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
Earlier this month, we discussed a memorandum issued by Deputy Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).
United States Criminal Law

Earlier this month, we discussedmemorandum issued by Deputy Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).  This memorandum, referred to as the "Yates Memo," reaffirms the Government's commitment to prosecuting individuals and formally instructs prosecutors to focus on individual accountability when dealing with corporate misconduct. As we discussed, the Yates Memo sets forth certain criteria that must be satisfied in order for a corporation to receive so-called "cooperation credit." Notably, the Yates Memo requires a corporation to identify all individuals involved in the corporate wrongdoing and provide all relevant evidence implicating those individuals.

Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice's  Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division, Leslie R. Caldwell, spoke at the Global Investigations Review Conference in New York. Discussing the implication of the Yates Memo, AAG Caldwell stated, in part, that "...companies seeking cooperation credit must affirmatively work to identify and discover relevant information about culpable individuals through independent, thorough investigations.  Companies cannot just disclose facts relating to general corporate misconduct and withhold facts about the responsible individuals.  And internal investigations cannot end with a conclusion  of corporate liability, while stopping short of identifying those who committed the criminal conduct."

On our Securities Matters blog, our colleague Bridget Rohde  discusses these and other remarks made by AAG Caldwell regarding the Yates Memo.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More