United States: Guidance On Patent Subject Matter Eligibility For Natural Phenomena And/Or Natural Products In The US: A Move In The Right Direction?

Last Updated: September 16 2015
Article by Tim Andrews

In decisions starting with Bilski (Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593 (2010)), followed by Myriad (Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 133 S. Ct. 2107 (2013)) and Mayo (Mayo v. Prometheus, 132 S. Ct. 1289 (2012)), and finally by Alice (Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int'l, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014)), the U.S. Supreme Court transformed the issue of patent eligibility, with far-reaching implications for the pharmaceutical and biotech industries and their ability to obtain fair protection for the fruits of their research. Here, we consider the developments of the eligibility guidelines, how they are applied (including a number of illustrative examples) and practical implications for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, including potential approaches to patent claim drafting.

Initially, in response to Myriad and Mayo, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released a memorandum entitled "Procedure For Subject Matter Eligibility Analysis Of Claims Reciting Or Involving Laws Of Nature/Natural Principles, Natural Phenomena, And/Or Natural Products". This March 2014 Guidance applied to "claims (i.e., machine, composition, manufacture and process claims) reciting or involving laws of nature/natural principles, natural phenomena, and/or natural products".

The issuance of the March 2014 Guidance caused considerable and understandable concern in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries over exactly what might now be patent eligible. Few had imagined after the Myriad and Mayo decisions issued that the USPTO would seek to take the reasoning of those decisions (which, it had appeared, set a narrow exclusion to patentability to naturally occurring gene sequences) and extrapolate it to an extreme that most observers believe was never intended by the Courts. Section 101 eligibility in the US was always intended to be a coarse sieve, not a fine filter. The first months immediately after the issuance of the March 2014 Guidance saw a sharp rise in eligibility objections.

The USPTO embarked on an exercise in which it held meets with interested stakeholders, including representatives from the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. In the light of the feedback that it received, on 16 December 2014 the USPTO published its 2014 Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility. This came into force with immediate effect and replaced the highly controversial earlier Guidance. It also supplemented the Guidance issued following the Alice Corp decision concerning abstract ideas issued earlier in 2014. The new Guidance requires the examiner to evaluate the claim as a whole. Examples are given of how the new approach should be applied, using the facts from previously decided cases including Myriad, Mayo and Alice. In the following, we discuss this new guidance and consider the practical implications for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries for the drafting, filing and prosecution of patent applications in the US directed to natural products.

It is firstly important to understand is that the December 2014 Guidance is for USPTO examiners to enable them to interpret the key Myriad, Mayo and Alice decisions. It is not binding on the US courts. This Guidance sets out a two-part test, with the second part itself divided into two steps. In step 1, the examiner must first decide if the claim is related broadly to patentable subject matter: is the claimed invention a process, machine or a composition of matter? If not, then the claim is not eligible subject matter. If it is, then the claim is analysed to determine if it relates in whole or in part to a judicial exception to patent-eligibility (step 2A). If not, then the claim satisfies the requirements of patent eligibility under Section 101. If the claim is determined to relate in part to a judicial exception, then the claim is analysed to determine if it recites additional elements that amount to significantly more than the judicial exception (step 2B). The analysis will only proceed to step 2B when the claim is directed to an exception, i.e. when no markedly different characteristics are shown.

We now consider how these steps are applied by the examiners through the use of illustrative examples that the USPTO has provided to its own examiners to assist them in guiding how they interpret the Interim Guidance of December 2014. We will then consider the practical implications for users of the patent system in the US seeking to obtain protections in the pharmaceutical and biotech fields.

Step 2A appears to be an important improvement for pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in the approach to be adopted by examiners when considering eligibility of natural products when compared to the March 2014 Guidance. Thus, for example, under the December 2014 Guidance a combination product as a whole must be assessed to determine if it is markedly different from a product of nature. Under the March 2014 Guidance, evaluation of a combination of natural products was performed by individually comparing each component part to its naturally occurring form, and the effect of the combination of the products on, for example, the whole was not given.

As an example, under the March 2014 Guidance gunpowder was considered to be a combination of three naturally occurring products (potassium nitrate, charcoal and sulfur). Each was considered to be in its 'naturally occurring, unchanged state' in the mixture and it was not considered to display any of the exceptions set out in the final step of the March 2014 Guidance (equivalent to step 2B of the December 2014 Guidance). In the example published with the December 2014 Guidance, the analysis of gunpowder as a combination holds it to be markedly different from its naturally-occurring components because gunpowder is explosive, while the naturally-occurring substances on their own are not. This functional difference in the combination compared to the activities of the individual components enables subject matter eligibility to be acknowledged.

Another example where there has been a change in approach to combinations is seen in the example of a claim to a "beverage composition comprising pomelo juice and an effective amount of an added preservative". There is no naturally occurring counterpart to the claimed combination, so the combination is compared to the individual components as they occur in nature (Step 1: YES). Because of its "slower spoiling," the properties of the claimed combination are considered markedly different from the properties of the juice by itself in nature. (Step 2: NO). This is true regardless of whether the preservative is a natural product or a non-natural product. In the examples under the March 2014 Guidance, the composition comprising pomelo juice and another natural product (vitamin E) was considered patent ineligible as both were considered to be naturally occurring products which were unchanged in the combination, emphasising the importance of this change in approach resulting from considering the claim as a whole to determine if it is markedly different from a product of nature.

Another improvement in Step 2A is how Examiners should approach claims directed to or comprising isolated or purified natural products. Under the new Interim Guidance, such a product may be eligible if there is a resultant change in characteristics sufficient to show a marked difference from the natural counterpart. Differences that are exemplified include a change in the biological or pharmacological functions or activities, chemical or physical properties, changes in phenotype, or changes in structure and form, whether chemical, genetic or physical. Purified products were considered ineligible under the March 2014 Guidelines.

One example given together with the December 2015 Guidance is directed to a method claim reciting "a method of treating breast or colon cancer, comprising administering an effective amount of purified amazonic acid to a patient suffering from breast or colon cancer" is patent eligible under the new guidelines. The claim does not even require an analysis of "markedly different" because the claim is focused on a process of practically applying the product to treat a particular disease. Under the previous guidelines, such a claim was typically rejected as patent ineligible unless it also recited a dosage and/or a time period of administration. However it is to be noted that the analysis still considers that isolated purified amazonic acid is not patent eligible, despite the fact that the details of the example state that micrograms of the isolated compound are effective whereas a patient would have to ingest several tonnes of leaves to achieve the same effect, this is still considered to lack subject matter eligibility as the analysis argues that it is not 'markedly different' from the 'naturally occurring product in its natural state'.

For a claim that does not recite something "markedly different" from the natural counterpart (Step 2B), the Interim Guidance does not depart significantly from the March 2014 Guidance. The claim must be analysed to determine if elements other than those related to a judicial exception amount to something significantly more than the exception itself. The Interim Guidance provides examples of what is and is not considered "significantly more".

This is further emphasised by the example of 'purified Antibiotic L'. Under the Interim Guidance, a claim to this is deemed patent eligible. The different result is rationalised on the grounds that in the specification's definition of purified Antibiotic L, the claim is limited to Antibiotic L in the form of tetrahedral crystals or having a high-mannose N-glycan on residue 49. Thus, the claim does not encompass naturally occurring Antibiotic L (which forms hexagonal-pyramidal crystals, and has a bacillosamine N-glycan on residue 49).

An example of genetically modified bacterium illustrates that a naturally occurring product that is unchanged from its natural state ('A stable energy-generating plasmid, which provides a hydrocarbon degradative pathway) does not have markedly different characteristics and hence is not patent eligible: there is no information to suggest that they are markedly different from naturally-occurring energy-generating plasmids. However, a claim that incorporates changes in biological function between the claimed product and its natural counterpart ('A bacterium from the genus Pseudomonas containing therein at least two stable energy-generating plasmids, each of said plasmids providing a separate hydrocarbon degradative pathway') can demonstrate markedly different characteristics and hence be patent eligible: the bacterium comprising at least two plasmids is able to provide at least two hydrocarbon degradative pathways, compared to the naturally occurring counterpart that only has one, and hence is markedly different.

The public was invited by the USPTO to submit written comments up to 90 days from publication of the Interim Guidance in the Federal Register (a deadline of around 16 March 2015). This resulted in the issuance of further Guidance in July 2015. However, this did not address any issues relating to natural phenomena at all and was restricted to clarification of the guidance for abstract ideas.

The first months immediately after the issuance of the March 2014 Guidance saw a sharp rise in eligibility objections. Since the issuance of the December 2014 Guidelines, while the number of eligibility objections is still considerably higher than it was prior to the introduction of either sets of guidelines following Myriad and Mayo the impression of practitioners is that the number of eligibility objections has fallen. After all the clamour and the resultant partial retreat by the USPTO in the revised Interim Guidance, it is to be hoped that the promised 'balanced' approach is indeed starting to be seen in practice.

Time, of course, will tell and in the meantime we will be watching closely to determine how things develop and then devising the best strategies to adopt in this fast changing environment. However, we certainly advise at this stage that new applications in the US should include broader claims than might have been feared were allowable only a few months ago. It will be important, nevertheless, to ensure that fallback positions are included with specific limitations that may assist in overcoming any objections of lack of eligibility, e.g. specific crystal structures that are not found in nature, methods of treatment comprising specific dosage regimes, humanized antibodies and non-naturally occurring DNA sequences.

This article was originally published in MedNous.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions