United States: Second Circuit Clarifies That A District Court Must Stay, And May Not Dismiss, Arbitrable Claims Pending Arbitration

Last Updated: September 9 2015
Article by Jeffrey M. Prokop and Jamie Shookman

​When a trial court determines that all of the claims before it must be arbitrated, does the court have discretion to dismiss the case or must it stay the case pending arbitration if one party has requested a stay?  Widening a split among the Circuits, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled on July 28, 2015 that Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (also known as the "FAA") imposes a mandatory stay when all claims have been referred to arbitration and a party has requested a stay.  Katz v. Cellco P'ship, No. 14-138, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13055 (2nd. Cir. July 28, 2015).  The Second Circuit's opinion, which overturned a ruling by Southern District Judge Briccetti dismissing the case, marks an important clarification of the law for practitioners in the Second Circuit, and underscores the disparate approaches to this issue among the Circuits. 

The Facts of the Case

In Katz, the plaintiff sued Verizon on behalf of a putative class of New York-area Verizon telephone subscribers, asserting breach of contract and consumer fraud claims arising out of a rate increase purportedly concealed as a monthly administrative charge.  Katz's contract with Verizon incorporated the company's customer agreement, which contained a clause referring all disputes arising out of the agreement or Verizon's wireless services to arbitration.  Verizon moved to compel arbitration and stay district court proceeding pending arbitration pursuant to Sections 3 and 4 of the FAA.  Katz argued that if the court compelled arbitration, the action should be dismissed, not stayed. 

The District Court ruled that all of Katz's claims were arbitrable and dismissed the case.  In so doing, the court noted that district courts in the Second Circuit were divided on whether a court has discretion to dismiss upon compelling arbitration, but stated that it agreed that dismissal was the proper remedy when all claims in a lawsuit are arbitrable.  See Katz v. Cellco P'ship, No. 12-cv-9193, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176784, at *42 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2013).  Both parties appealed, with Verizon seeking reversal of the District Court's decision to dismiss, rather than stay, the proceeding.

The Second Circuit's Ruling

In an opinion by Judge Wesley, the Second Circuit affirmed the ruling compelling arbitration, but reversed the District Court's dismissal of the action, resolving a split among district courts in the Circuit as to whether a stay or dismissal is appropriate where all claims have been referred to arbitration. 

The Court ruled that Section 3 of the FAA creates an obligation to order a stay, because its text states that, upon referring all claims to arbitration, courts "shall on application of one of the parties stay the trial of the action." 9 U.S.C. § 3 (emphasis added).  In light of the word "shall," the Court held that this obligation is "impervious to judicial discretion."  Moreover, the Court reasoned that a mandatory stay "comports with the FAA's statutory scheme and pro-arbitration policy."  In particular, Section 16 of the FAA only permits appeal of an interlocutory order denying a motion to stay or compel pursuant to Sections 3 or 4 of the FAA, and expressly denies the right to an immediate appeal for an order compelling arbitration or staying proceedings pending arbitration.  While acknowledging trial courts' interest in efficiently managing their dockets, the Court noted that affording judges discretion to dismiss matters in contravention of the FAA's plain language "would empower them to confer appellate rights expressly proscribed by Congress."  Accordingly, the Court's ruling means that litigants in the Second Circuit that have successfully moved to stay in favor of arbitration are insulated from further litigation on issues of arbitrability during the pendency of the arbitration proceedings.

As the Second Circuit acknowledged in Katz, the Circuits are divided on the issue, with the Seventh, Third, Tenth, Eleventh Circuits holding, or at least implying, that a stay is mandatory in light of the language of Section 3 of the FAA.  The First, Fifth and Ninth Circuits have suggested that district courts may dismiss an action where all of the claims are arbitrable.  The Supreme Court declined to address the issue in Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph, 531 U.S. 79, 87 n.2 (2000).  Moreover, practitioners in this area have often found widely disparate approaches among, and even within, the Circuits.  For example, the Fourth Circuit recently acknowledged that two of its prior opinions are in tension on the matter, but declined to resolve the issue.  See Aggarao v. MOL Ship Mgmt. Co., 675 F.3d 355, 376 (4th Cir. 2012).  Furthermore, courts that have dismissed an action where all of the claims were found to be arbitrable have done so on the basis of Rule 12(b)(1), while others have dismissed on 12(b)(3) or 12(b)(6) grounds.  See e.g., Atkins v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 819 F.2d 644, 647 (6th Cir. 1987) (dismissing on 12(b)(1) grounds); Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr. v. Global Excel Mgmt., Inc., No. CV-09-3627, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139848, at *25 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2010) (dismissing on 12(b)(3) grounds);Thinket Ink Info. Resources, Inc. v. Sun Microsystems, Inc., 368 F.3d 1053, 1060 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissing on 12(b)(6) grounds).  However, a common theme among courts that have dismissed, rather than stayed claims, is that staying a proceeding in which all claims are subject to arbitration would serve no useful purpose and simply clutter the docket.  See, e.g, Reynolds v. de Silva, No. 09-Civ-9218,2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18040, at *23 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2010) ("It would be an inefficient use of the Court's docket to stay the action.").  In Katz, the Second Circuit expressly rejected that reasoning and held that the statutory mandate set out in Section 3 of the FAA trumps any interest in efficient docket management.

In sum, Katz represents an important clarification of the law in the Second Circuit and ensures that a party resisting a motion to stay under Section 3 of the FAA will no longer have a route to appeal an adverse ruling until after the arbitration proceedings are complete.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
21 Sep 2018, Conference, Florida, United States

Employment partner, Michael Weil will be participating in The Intellectual Property Law Institute’s 2018 Conference.

26 Sep 2018, Conference, New York, United States

Employment Partner, Mandy Perry and Chair of Orrick's Global Employment Law Practice, Mike Delikat will be participating in the Global Business Protections 2018: International Restrictive Covenants and Confidential Information Conference.

26 Sep 2018, Seminar, Tokyo, Japan

Orrick’s Global Japan Practice is hosting a series of “Orrick Library” seminars to explore legal issues in various fields in Japan as well as the United States, Asia and Europe

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions