United States: Tax Court Rules Against IRS And Invalidates Treasury Regulation § 1.482-7(d)(2)

On July 17, 2015, the US Tax Court (en banc) ruled in favor of the taxpayer in Altera Corporation v. Commissioner,1  holding that Treas. Reg. 1.482-7(d)(2), which was issued  in 2003 requiring participants in qualified cost-sharing arrangements ("QCSAs") to share  stock-based compensation costs to achieve an arm's-length result, was arbitrary and  capricious and therefore invalid.

Altera US, the parent company of an affiliated group of corporations, developed,  manufactured and sold programmable logic devices ("PLDs") and related hardware and  software for use in programming the PLDs ("programming tools"). Altera US entered into  a technology license agreement with its subsidiary, Altera International, granting Altera  International the right to use and exploit, everywhere except the United States and  Canada, all of Altera US's intangible property relating to PLDs and programming tools. In  exchange for the right granted, Altera International paid royalties to Altera US each year  through 2003. Under an existing R&D cost-sharing agreement, Altera US and Altera  International agreed to pool their resources to conduct research and development  relating to the PLDs and programming tools. Under the R&D cost-sharing agreement,  Altera US and Altera International agreed to share the risks and costs of research and  development activities they performed between May 23, 1997 through 2007.

During each of taxable years ending December 31, 2004, December 30, 2005,  December 29, 2006 and December 28, 2007, Altera US granted stock options and other  stock-based compensation to certain of its employees. Certain of these employees who  received stock options and other stock-based compensation performed R&D activities  subject to the R&D cost-sharing agreement. The stock-based compensation was  $24,549,315 (2004); $23,015,453 (2005); $11,365,388 (2006) and $15,463,565 (2007).  The stock-based compensation was not included in the cost pool under the R&D  cost-sharing agreement. The IRS audited petitioner and issued Notices of Deficiency with  respect to the 2004-2007 taxable years. The Notices of Deficiency allocated, pursuant to  Section 482, income from Altera International to Altera US by increasing Altera  International's cost-sharing payments for 2004-2007.

Section 482 – Arm's-Length Standard

Section 482 authorizes the Commissioner to allocate income and expenses among related  entities. The first sentence of Section 482 provides, in relevant part, as follows:

In any case of two or more organizations, trades or businesses * * * owned or  controlled directly or indirectly by the same interests, the Secretary may  distribute, apportion, or allocate gross income, deductions, credits, or allowances  between or among such organizations, trades, or businesses, if he determines  that such distribution, apportionment, or allocation is necessary in order to prevent evasion of taxes or clearly to reflect the income of any of such  organizations, trades, or businesses. * * *

The purpose of Section 482 is to ensure that taxpayers clearly reflect income attributable  to controlled transactions and to prevent the avoidance of taxes with respect to such  transactions.2   In 1986, Congress amended Section 482 by adding the following: "In the  case of any transfer (or license) of intangible property * * *, the income with respect to  such transfer or license shall be commensurate with the income attributable to the  intangible."3   This commensurate-with-income approach was adopted because of the  recognition that there may be extreme difficulties in determining whether the  arm's-length transfer between unrelated parties are comparable.

A later study by Treasury and the IRS explained that the commensurate-with-income  standard is consistent with the arm's-length standard because:

[l]ooking at the income related to the intangible and splitting it according to  relative economic contributions is consistent with what unrelated parties do. The  general goal of the commensurate-with-income standard is, therefore, to ensure  that each party earns the income or return from the intangible that an unrelated  party would earn in an arm's-length transfer of the intangible.4

In Xilinx Inc. v. Commissioner,5  the Tax Court addressed the treatment of stock-based  compensation between controlled entities that entered into a qualified cost-sharing  agreement. The Tax Court held that the Commissioner's allocation of stock-based  compensation failed to satisfy the arm's-length standard of Section 1.482-1(b)(1).

In reaching this holding the Tax Court concluded that, consistent with the 1995  cost-sharing regulations: (1) in determining the true taxable income of a controlled  taxpayer, the arm's-length standard applies in all cases; (2) the arm's-length standard  requires an analysis of what unrelated entities would do; (3) the  commensurate-with-income standard was never intended to supplant the arm's-length  standard; and (4) unrelated parties would not share the exercise spread or grant date  value of stock-based compensation.6   In so holding, the Tax Court observed, in part, that  the IRS's expert agreed that unrelated parties would not share the stock-based  compensation costs, and found that the taxpayer proved that companies do not take into  account either the exercise spread or grant date value of stock-based compensation for  producing pricing purposes. The Ninth Circuit initially reversed the Tax Court, but  subsequently withdrew its opinion in Xilinx and issued a new opinion affirming the  Court.7

The Circuit Court affirmed the finding that all costs requirement should be construed as  not applying to stock-based compensation because the regulations should be interpreted  in the light of the dominant purpose of the statute—parity between taxpayers in  uncontrolled transactions and taxpayers in controlled transactions.

2003 Cost-Sharing Regulations

The Xilinx opinion did not sit well with the IRS. In 2002 Treasury issued a notice of  proposed rulemaking and notice of a public hearing with respect to proposed  amendments to the cost-sharing regulations. The purpose of the proposed amendments  to the cost-sharing regulations was to clarify "that stock-based compensation must be  taken into account in determining operating expenses under § 1.482-7(d)(1), and to  provide rules for measuring stock-based compensation costs."8   A public hearing on the  proposed amendments was held on November 20, 2002.

In response to the Notice, several commentators informed Treasury that they knew of no  transactions between unrelated parties, including any cost-sharing arrangement, service  agreement or other contract, that required one party to pay or reimburse the other party  for amounts attributable to stock-based compensation. Indeed, several commentators  identified arm's-length agreements in which stock-based compensation was not shared or  reimbursed, and several commentators cited the practice of the Federal Government and  cited Federal regulations which prohibit reimbursement of amounts attributable to  stock-based compensation.9

In August 2003, Treasury issued the final rule. The final rule explicitly required parties to  QCSAs to share stock-based compensation costs.10  The final rule also added  sections 1.482-1(b)(2)(i) through 1.482-7(a)(3), Income Tax Regs., to provide that a QCSA  produces an arm's-length result only if the parties' costs are determined in accordance  with the final rule.11

The final rule provides two methods for measuring the value of stock-based  compensation: a default method and an elective method. Under the default method, "the  costs attributable to stock based compensation generally are included as intangible  development costs upon the exercise of the option and measured by the spread between  the option strike price and the price of the underlying stock."12   Under the elective method,  "the costs attributable to stock options are taken into account in certain cases in  accordance with the 'fair value' of the option, as reported for financial accounting  purposes either as a charge against income or in footnoted disclosures."13

When it issued the final rule, the files maintained by Treasury relating to the final rule did  not contain any expert opinions, empirical data or published or unpublished articles,  papers, surveys or reports supporting a determination that the amounts attributable to  stock-based compensation must be included in the cost pool of QCSAs to achieve an  arm's-length result. Those files also did not contain any record that Treasury searched  any database that could have contained agreements between unrelated parties relating to  joint undertakings or the provision of services.

At the outset, the parties disagreed whether the final rule was a legislative rule or an  interpretative rule. If interpretative, as alleged by the Service, the requirements of APA  Section 553 did not apply; thus there was no need to publish a notice of proposed  rulemaking, provide interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking  and incorporate a concise general statement of the rule's basis and purpose. The Tax  Court concluded that the final rule was a legislative rule subject to the APA Section 553  because Treasury intended that the final rule to have the force of law. The court further  concluded that the final rule must satisfy the "reasoned decision-making standard"  followed in State Farm14 , because the "validity of the final rule turns on whether Treasury  reasonably concluded that it is consistent with the arm's-length standard."15

Under the rubric of State Farm, the taxpayer argued that the final rule was invalid  because (1) it lacked a basis in fact, (2) Treasury failed to rationally connect the choices it  made with the facts if found, (3) Treasury failed to respond to significant comments, and  (4) the final rule was contrary to the evidence presented to Treasury. The Tax Court  agreed with the taxpayers.

The Tax Court found that the final rule lacked a basis in fact because Treasury failed to  provide a reasoned basis for its conclusions from any evidence in the administrative  record. According to the court, there was no evidence in the record that supported  Treasury's belief that unrelated parties would share stock-based compensation costs.  Moreover, the Tax Court refused to defer to Treasury's expertise because the court found  that commentators introduced significant evidence showing that parties operating at  arm's-length would not share stock-based compensation. The Tax Court also found that  Treasury failed to respond directly to any of the evidence that unrelated parties would not  share stock-based compensation costs. Specifically, the court held that "[m]eaningful  judicial review and fair treatment of affected persons require 'an exchange of views,  information and criticism between interested persons and the agency.' Treasury's failure  to adequately respond to commentators frustrates our review of the final rule and was  prejudicial to affected entities."16

Lastly, the Tax Court concluded that the final rule was contrary to the evidence before  Treasury when it issued the final rule. The court noted that the significant evidence submitted by commentators demonstrated that unrelated parties to QCSAs would not  share stock-based compensation costs; Treasury never found the submitted evidence  incredible, and accepted the commentators' economic analysis. Accordingly, Treasury's  explanation for its decision ran counter to the evidence. Because the court found that the  final rule lacked a basis in fact, and was contrary to the evidence presented, the court held  that the final rule failed to satisfy State Farm's reasoned decision making standard and was  therefore invalid. Finally, the Tax Court held that the harmless error rule of APA  Section 706 was not applicable because it was not clear that Treasury would have adopted  the final rule if it had been determined to be inconsistent with the arm's-length standard.

The Altera decision is significant for taxpayers with cost-sharing agreements. The  decision may also have a broad impact on future regulatory rulemaking and challenges to  existing IRS regulations.

Footnotes

1  145 T.C. No. 3 at 51 (2015).

See Treas. Reg. 1.482-1(a)(1)

3  Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-514, Sec. 1231(e)(1), 100 Stat. at 2562. 

4  Notice 88-123, 1988-2 C.B. at 472.

5  125 T.C. 37 (2005), affd 598 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2010). 

6  145 T.C. No. 3 at 70-75. 

See Xilinx Inc. v. Commissioner, 598 F.3d at 1191.

See 67 Fed, Reg. 48997, 48998 (July 29, 2002).

9  145 T.C. No. 3 at 72-73.

10  See Treas. Reg. § 1.482-7(d)(2). 

11  See T.D. 9088, 2003-2 C.B. 841, 847-848. 

12  Id., 2003-2 C.B. at 844. 

13  Id. 14   United States v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29 (1983)

15  145 T.C. No. 3 at 68.

16  145 T.C. No. 3 at 74.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.