United States: Tax Court Rules Against IRS And Invalidates Treasury Regulation § 1.482-7(d)(2)

On July 17, 2015, the US Tax Court (en banc) ruled in favor of the taxpayer in Altera Corporation v. Commissioner,1  holding that Treas. Reg. 1.482-7(d)(2), which was issued  in 2003 requiring participants in qualified cost-sharing arrangements ("QCSAs") to share  stock-based compensation costs to achieve an arm's-length result, was arbitrary and  capricious and therefore invalid.

Altera US, the parent company of an affiliated group of corporations, developed,  manufactured and sold programmable logic devices ("PLDs") and related hardware and  software for use in programming the PLDs ("programming tools"). Altera US entered into  a technology license agreement with its subsidiary, Altera International, granting Altera  International the right to use and exploit, everywhere except the United States and  Canada, all of Altera US's intangible property relating to PLDs and programming tools. In  exchange for the right granted, Altera International paid royalties to Altera US each year  through 2003. Under an existing R&D cost-sharing agreement, Altera US and Altera  International agreed to pool their resources to conduct research and development  relating to the PLDs and programming tools. Under the R&D cost-sharing agreement,  Altera US and Altera International agreed to share the risks and costs of research and  development activities they performed between May 23, 1997 through 2007.

During each of taxable years ending December 31, 2004, December 30, 2005,  December 29, 2006 and December 28, 2007, Altera US granted stock options and other  stock-based compensation to certain of its employees. Certain of these employees who  received stock options and other stock-based compensation performed R&D activities  subject to the R&D cost-sharing agreement. The stock-based compensation was  $24,549,315 (2004); $23,015,453 (2005); $11,365,388 (2006) and $15,463,565 (2007).  The stock-based compensation was not included in the cost pool under the R&D  cost-sharing agreement. The IRS audited petitioner and issued Notices of Deficiency with  respect to the 2004-2007 taxable years. The Notices of Deficiency allocated, pursuant to  Section 482, income from Altera International to Altera US by increasing Altera  International's cost-sharing payments for 2004-2007.

Section 482 – Arm's-Length Standard

Section 482 authorizes the Commissioner to allocate income and expenses among related  entities. The first sentence of Section 482 provides, in relevant part, as follows:

In any case of two or more organizations, trades or businesses * * * owned or  controlled directly or indirectly by the same interests, the Secretary may  distribute, apportion, or allocate gross income, deductions, credits, or allowances  between or among such organizations, trades, or businesses, if he determines  that such distribution, apportionment, or allocation is necessary in order to prevent evasion of taxes or clearly to reflect the income of any of such  organizations, trades, or businesses. * * *

The purpose of Section 482 is to ensure that taxpayers clearly reflect income attributable  to controlled transactions and to prevent the avoidance of taxes with respect to such  transactions.2   In 1986, Congress amended Section 482 by adding the following: "In the  case of any transfer (or license) of intangible property * * *, the income with respect to  such transfer or license shall be commensurate with the income attributable to the  intangible."3   This commensurate-with-income approach was adopted because of the  recognition that there may be extreme difficulties in determining whether the  arm's-length transfer between unrelated parties are comparable.

A later study by Treasury and the IRS explained that the commensurate-with-income  standard is consistent with the arm's-length standard because:

[l]ooking at the income related to the intangible and splitting it according to  relative economic contributions is consistent with what unrelated parties do. The  general goal of the commensurate-with-income standard is, therefore, to ensure  that each party earns the income or return from the intangible that an unrelated  party would earn in an arm's-length transfer of the intangible.4

In Xilinx Inc. v. Commissioner,5  the Tax Court addressed the treatment of stock-based  compensation between controlled entities that entered into a qualified cost-sharing  agreement. The Tax Court held that the Commissioner's allocation of stock-based  compensation failed to satisfy the arm's-length standard of Section 1.482-1(b)(1).

In reaching this holding the Tax Court concluded that, consistent with the 1995  cost-sharing regulations: (1) in determining the true taxable income of a controlled  taxpayer, the arm's-length standard applies in all cases; (2) the arm's-length standard  requires an analysis of what unrelated entities would do; (3) the  commensurate-with-income standard was never intended to supplant the arm's-length  standard; and (4) unrelated parties would not share the exercise spread or grant date  value of stock-based compensation.6   In so holding, the Tax Court observed, in part, that  the IRS's expert agreed that unrelated parties would not share the stock-based  compensation costs, and found that the taxpayer proved that companies do not take into  account either the exercise spread or grant date value of stock-based compensation for  producing pricing purposes. The Ninth Circuit initially reversed the Tax Court, but  subsequently withdrew its opinion in Xilinx and issued a new opinion affirming the  Court.7

The Circuit Court affirmed the finding that all costs requirement should be construed as  not applying to stock-based compensation because the regulations should be interpreted  in the light of the dominant purpose of the statute—parity between taxpayers in  uncontrolled transactions and taxpayers in controlled transactions.

2003 Cost-Sharing Regulations

The Xilinx opinion did not sit well with the IRS. In 2002 Treasury issued a notice of  proposed rulemaking and notice of a public hearing with respect to proposed  amendments to the cost-sharing regulations. The purpose of the proposed amendments  to the cost-sharing regulations was to clarify "that stock-based compensation must be  taken into account in determining operating expenses under § 1.482-7(d)(1), and to  provide rules for measuring stock-based compensation costs."8   A public hearing on the  proposed amendments was held on November 20, 2002.

In response to the Notice, several commentators informed Treasury that they knew of no  transactions between unrelated parties, including any cost-sharing arrangement, service  agreement or other contract, that required one party to pay or reimburse the other party  for amounts attributable to stock-based compensation. Indeed, several commentators  identified arm's-length agreements in which stock-based compensation was not shared or  reimbursed, and several commentators cited the practice of the Federal Government and  cited Federal regulations which prohibit reimbursement of amounts attributable to  stock-based compensation.9

In August 2003, Treasury issued the final rule. The final rule explicitly required parties to  QCSAs to share stock-based compensation costs.10  The final rule also added  sections 1.482-1(b)(2)(i) through 1.482-7(a)(3), Income Tax Regs., to provide that a QCSA  produces an arm's-length result only if the parties' costs are determined in accordance  with the final rule.11

The final rule provides two methods for measuring the value of stock-based  compensation: a default method and an elective method. Under the default method, "the  costs attributable to stock based compensation generally are included as intangible  development costs upon the exercise of the option and measured by the spread between  the option strike price and the price of the underlying stock."12   Under the elective method,  "the costs attributable to stock options are taken into account in certain cases in  accordance with the 'fair value' of the option, as reported for financial accounting  purposes either as a charge against income or in footnoted disclosures."13

When it issued the final rule, the files maintained by Treasury relating to the final rule did  not contain any expert opinions, empirical data or published or unpublished articles,  papers, surveys or reports supporting a determination that the amounts attributable to  stock-based compensation must be included in the cost pool of QCSAs to achieve an  arm's-length result. Those files also did not contain any record that Treasury searched  any database that could have contained agreements between unrelated parties relating to  joint undertakings or the provision of services.

At the outset, the parties disagreed whether the final rule was a legislative rule or an  interpretative rule. If interpretative, as alleged by the Service, the requirements of APA  Section 553 did not apply; thus there was no need to publish a notice of proposed  rulemaking, provide interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking  and incorporate a concise general statement of the rule's basis and purpose. The Tax  Court concluded that the final rule was a legislative rule subject to the APA Section 553  because Treasury intended that the final rule to have the force of law. The court further  concluded that the final rule must satisfy the "reasoned decision-making standard"  followed in State Farm14 , because the "validity of the final rule turns on whether Treasury  reasonably concluded that it is consistent with the arm's-length standard."15

Under the rubric of State Farm, the taxpayer argued that the final rule was invalid  because (1) it lacked a basis in fact, (2) Treasury failed to rationally connect the choices it  made with the facts if found, (3) Treasury failed to respond to significant comments, and  (4) the final rule was contrary to the evidence presented to Treasury. The Tax Court  agreed with the taxpayers.

The Tax Court found that the final rule lacked a basis in fact because Treasury failed to  provide a reasoned basis for its conclusions from any evidence in the administrative  record. According to the court, there was no evidence in the record that supported  Treasury's belief that unrelated parties would share stock-based compensation costs.  Moreover, the Tax Court refused to defer to Treasury's expertise because the court found  that commentators introduced significant evidence showing that parties operating at  arm's-length would not share stock-based compensation. The Tax Court also found that  Treasury failed to respond directly to any of the evidence that unrelated parties would not  share stock-based compensation costs. Specifically, the court held that "[m]eaningful  judicial review and fair treatment of affected persons require 'an exchange of views,  information and criticism between interested persons and the agency.' Treasury's failure  to adequately respond to commentators frustrates our review of the final rule and was  prejudicial to affected entities."16

Lastly, the Tax Court concluded that the final rule was contrary to the evidence before  Treasury when it issued the final rule. The court noted that the significant evidence submitted by commentators demonstrated that unrelated parties to QCSAs would not  share stock-based compensation costs; Treasury never found the submitted evidence  incredible, and accepted the commentators' economic analysis. Accordingly, Treasury's  explanation for its decision ran counter to the evidence. Because the court found that the  final rule lacked a basis in fact, and was contrary to the evidence presented, the court held  that the final rule failed to satisfy State Farm's reasoned decision making standard and was  therefore invalid. Finally, the Tax Court held that the harmless error rule of APA  Section 706 was not applicable because it was not clear that Treasury would have adopted  the final rule if it had been determined to be inconsistent with the arm's-length standard.

The Altera decision is significant for taxpayers with cost-sharing agreements. The  decision may also have a broad impact on future regulatory rulemaking and challenges to  existing IRS regulations.


1  145 T.C. No. 3 at 51 (2015).

See Treas. Reg. 1.482-1(a)(1)

3  Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-514, Sec. 1231(e)(1), 100 Stat. at 2562. 

4  Notice 88-123, 1988-2 C.B. at 472.

5  125 T.C. 37 (2005), affd 598 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2010). 

6  145 T.C. No. 3 at 70-75. 

See Xilinx Inc. v. Commissioner, 598 F.3d at 1191.

See 67 Fed, Reg. 48997, 48998 (July 29, 2002).

9  145 T.C. No. 3 at 72-73.

10  See Treas. Reg. § 1.482-7(d)(2). 

11  See T.D. 9088, 2003-2 C.B. 841, 847-848. 

12  Id., 2003-2 C.B. at 844. 

13  Id. 14   United States v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29 (1983)

15  145 T.C. No. 3 at 68.

16  145 T.C. No. 3 at 74.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions