United States: Claim Construction And Amendment Procedure During PTAB Trials: Up For Comment

Last Updated: September 4 2015
Article by Jennifer Bush

Recently, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office released a package of proposed procedural revisions affecting post-grant proceedings before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), and conducted a three-city "roadshow" for discussion of the proposed changes. The proposed rules are available in the Federal Register, at 80 FR 50719- 50747, and public comments are open for 60 days from the announcement.

The proposed rule changes include allowing patent owners to submit expert declarations or other new testimonial evidence with their preliminary response, requiring a Rule-11 type certification by the parties' attorneys, replacing page counts with word-count limits for most papers, and clarifying claim construction standards and amendment procedures.

The last of these appears to be the most ripe for comment, as the USPTO adopts proposed rules to change the current standard of broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) for cases near expiration, and to clarify the procedure for motions to amend the claims.

With respect to the former, the office proposes retaining the BRI standard for most cases, but applying an "ordinary and customary meaning" construction, as set forth in Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1316, 75 USPQ2d 1321, 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2005), for cases in which the patent at issue will expire before a final written decision in the PTAB proceeding.

This change has produced a large number of widely varying comments on the proper construction for PTAB trials. The USPTO's rationale for keeping the BRI standard for most cases is two-fold, according to the USPTO Director's Forum blog: First, it is the standard used by the USPTO for over 100 years; and second, an inter partes review proceeding provides the patent owner "the opportunity to amend" its claims. The stated rationale for the office applying a Phillips-type construction for patents that will expire prior to the end of the PTAB proceeding is that they "essentially lack any viable opportunity to amend the claims in an AIA proceeding."

Some commentators have complained that the dual standard confuses the issue by having two standards, under which some patents will be treated differently than other patents, and the unfairness that may result. Other commentators have noted that reexamination proceedings in the USPTO have a similar, dual standard since Ex parte Papst-Motoren, 1 USPQ2d 1655 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1986), which spelled out the BRI construction being used unless the patent at issue has expired, in which case a Phillips-style standard in applied. The reexamination standard thus differs only in that it applies a different standard for already expired patents versus the proposed rule applying to patents that will expire during the PTAB proceeding. However, as many have noted since the early AIA proposals regarding inter partes review in particular, it differs procedurally from reexamination, including the former inter partes reexamination.

Of particular relevance to this discussion is the related topic of the availability of the patent owner to amend claims during PTAB trial procedures, and how it differs from other office procedures. Inter partes reexamination gave a patent owner a broad right to amend and add patent claims during the course of the reexamination, including few restrictions on the number of claims and a greater number of opportunities to make such changes during the procedure. By contrast, in PTAB trials a patent owner has a single opportunity to file a motion to amend and a much higher standard to meet to amend claims.

The USPTO has recognized this difference, and believes the higher bar is appropriate in view of the examination difference between the procedures. In a case in which a motion to amend is granted during a PTAB trial, the amended claim becomes part of the patent without any further examination. Thus, the USPTO has rejected comments suggesting that motions to amend be liberally allowed.

However, looking at these various similarities and differences between USPTO procedures, their standards, and their purported rationales for those standards, one must question if the BRI standard is in fact the correct standard to apply in PTAB trials. The stated rationale has been that the patent owner has the opportunity to amend its claims - but in practice this has rarely been the case. Only six motions to amend in total have been granted by the PTAB as of June 2015 - a very small percentage of the whole.

The ability to amend was touted as a benefit of PTAB trials when the rules were being formed, but the rules governing PTAB trials do not provide an "opportunity to amend" as it is often articulated in discussions about the procedures. Rather, the rules mandate an opportunity to make one motion to amend but no promise of that motion being granted, and indeed it has not been granted most of the time.

One other way to look at this question is not to ask whether the BRI standard is the correct one to apply, but instead accept the standard as the rule for PTAB trials, and question the corresponding amendment procedure proffered as the rationale for using the BRI standard. In other words, if BRI is the rule, perhaps its use warrants a closer look at whether some "further examination" is appropriate when BRI is in effect.

To date, the USPTO's revision proposals regarding motions to amend have relied on attempts to clarify the motion to amend procedure, as it has done in Idle Free System Inc, v. Bergstrom Inc., Case IPR2012-00027 (Paper 26), and more recently in MasterImage 3D Inc. v. RealD Inc., Case IPR2015-00040 (Paper 42).

The office has stated that is does not contemplate seeking assistance from the Examiner Corps for review of motions to amend, likely out of concern for the oft-cited efficiency of PTAB trials, and also has not adopted suggestions that a denied motion to amend be converted into an ex parte examination, as the standards applied in each are different. However, these ideas may warrant further consideration and comment. It seems that a revised procedure including "further examination" of the claims per the proposed amendments would better align the procedure with other procedures applying the BRI construction standard.

In practice, the USPTO has a perfect record of having kept cases below its one-year mandate, with the current average resting nearer 11 months, and without ever using the six-month "good cause" extension. Could the current extra month, or the six-month extension, be used for cases in which some further examination is warranted? In addition, several existing USPTO procedures are known for expediting regular office examination, and in fact have been effective in so doing. Perhaps one of these procedures could provide a hint as to how to allow for additional examination during PTAB trials, while not sacrificing the efficiency of the process.

The office should look to these options and others for a way to bring into harmony the use of BRI as the claim construction standard in PTAB trials on the one hand, and the more limited availability of the patent owner to amend claims on the other, and further comments regarding these topics may lead to additional ideas on how to effect such harmonization.

Public comment on the proposed rules is available until Oct. 19, via email at PTABTrialPilot@uspto.gov​.​​

Originally published in the Daily Journal on September 2, 2015. ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
25 Sep 2018, Conference, California, United States

We're excited to introduce Women's IP Strategy, a 2-day conference that tackles both the IP, legal as well as broader career development obstacles, risks and rewards for women lawyers working in male-dominant industries.

2 Oct 2018, Webinar, California, United States

This CLE webinar will offer suggestions to litigators to help them comply with the new GDPR during e-discovery.

10 Oct 2018, Webinar, California, United States

For the past years, 3D printing has significantly revolutionized the business industry as it provides innovations and improvement to pre-existing processes.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions