United States: USCIS Provides L-1B Adjudications Policy

Included within the Obama administration's Executive Actions on Immigration announced in November, 2014 was a directive to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) from DHS Secretary Johnson to issue a long-awaited L-1B policy memorandum that provided clear, consolidated guidance on the meaning of "specialized knowledge." That memo has now been issued, and is implemented through an update to the immigration service's Adjudicator's Field Manual.

The L-1B nonimmigrant visa category for "specialized knowledge" intracompany transferee employees has been much maligned in the press and in Congress over the past several years, and has faced overly stringent adjudicatory review by U.S. immigration officers with Requests for Evidence running at 50% and denials of close to 30%. This has mainly been due to lack of clear statutory or regulatory guidance as to what is considered "specialized knowledge" in the L-1B context. Immigration adjudicators and petitioners instead have had to rely on a series of memorandums from various immigration officials dating back to 1994, all of which remained valid and authoritative. Frustration mounted for multinational employers as it became increasingly difficult to utilize the L-1B process to transfer to their U.S. operations key employees who possess specialized knowledge of the company's productsor procedures.

On August 17, 2015, the USCIS issued a Policy Memorandum on L-1B Adjudications Policy. The memo claims to be consistent with the earlier immigration service memos, but specifically supersedes them. This memo is meant to provide "consolidated and authoritative guidance on determining whether specialized knowledge has been established in L-1B petitions . . . ."

Standard of Review

Significantly, the memo first establishes that the USCIS officer's standard of review on an L-1B petition should be one of "preponderance of the evidence", rather than the higher standards of proof of "clear and convincing" or "beyond a reasonable doubt". The petitioner must show that what it claims is more likely the case than not. It does not need to remove all doubt from the adjudication.

"Specialized Knowledge"

Two key elements to a successful L-1B petition are a showing that the foreign national beneficiary possesses "specialized knowledge", and that the position offered involves the "specialized knowledge" held by the beneficiary. Under the immigration statute, a beneficiary is deemed to have specialized knowledge if they have 1) "special" knowledge of the company's product and its application in international markets, or 2) an "advanced" level of knowledge of the processes and procedures of the company.

The memo now defines "special knowledge" as that "which is knowledge of the petitioning organization's product, service, research, equipment, techniques, management or other interests and its application in international markets that is distinct or uncommon in comparison to that generally found in the particular industry.

It defines "advanced knowledge" as that "which is knowledge of or expertise in the petitioning organization's specific processes and procedures that is not commonly found in the relevant industry and is greatly developed or further along in progress, complexity and understanding than that generally found within an employer."

The memo then goes on to explain how to determine whether a beneficiary possesses such special or advanced knowledge, providing a non-exhaustive list of factors for the USCIS adjudicator to consider, as well as suggested evidence that petitioners may want to provide to make such a showing.

L-1B adjudicator's are instructed to look at these factors when determining whether a beneficiary's knowledge is specialized:

  • The beneficiary possesses knowledge of foreign operating conditions that is of significant value to the petitioning organization's U.S. operations.
  • The beneficiary has been employed abroad in a capacity involving assignments that have significantly enhanced the employer's productivity, competitiveness, image, or financial position.
  • The beneficiary's claimed specialized knowledge normally can be gained only through prior experience with the petitioning organization.
  • The beneficiary possesses knowledge of a product or process that cannot be easily transferred or taught to another individual without significant economic cost or inconvenience (because, for example, such knowledge may require substantial training, work experience, or education).
  • The beneficiary has knowledge of a process or a product that either is sophisticated or complex, or of a highly technical nature, although not necessarily unique to the petitioning organization.
  • The beneficiary possesses knowledge that is particularly beneficial to the petitioning organization's competitiveness in the marketplace.

The memo also instructs and corrects L-1B adjudicator's on several problem areas where adjudicator's have been seen to consistently misapply the law and regulations:

  • Specialized knowledge generally cannot be commonly held, lacking in complexity, or easily imparted to other individuals.
  • Specialized knowledge need not be proprietary or unique to the petitioning organization.
  • L-1B classification does not involve a test of the U.S. labor market.
  • Specialized knowledge need not be narrowly held within the petitioning organization.
  • Specialized knowledge workers need not occupy managerial or similar positions or command higher compensation compared to their peers.
  • Eligibility for another nonimmigrant classification is not a bar to eligibility for L-1B classification.

The following is suggested evidence the petitioner may want to submit to demonstrate that the beneficiary's knowledge is special or advanced:

  • Documentation of training, work experience, or education establishing the number of years the individual has been using or developing the claimed specialized knowledge as an employee of the petitioning organization or in the industry;
  • Evidence of the impact, if any, the transfer of the individual would have on the petitioning organization's U.S. operations;
  • Evidence that the alien is qualified to contribute significantly to the U.S. operation's knowledge of foreign operating conditions as a result of knowledge not generally found in the petitioning organization's U.S. operations;
  • Contracts, statements of work, or other documentation that shows that the beneficiary possesses knowledge that is particularly beneficial to the petitioning organization's competitiveness in the marketplace;
  • Evidence, such as correspondence or reports, establishing that the beneficiary has been employed abroad in a capacity involving assignments that have significantly enhanced the petitioning organization's productivity, competitiveness, image or financial position;
  • Personnel or in-house training records that establish that the beneficiary's claimed specialized knowledge normally can be gained only through prior experience or training with the petitioning organization;
  • Curricula and training manuals for internal training courses, financial documents, or other evidence that may demonstrate that the beneficiary possesses knowledge of a product or process that cannot be transferred or taught to another individual without significant economic cost or inconvenience;
  • Evidence of patents, trademarks, licenses, or contracts awarded to the petitioning organization based on the beneficiary's work, or similar evidence that the beneficiary has knowledge of a process or a product that either is sophisticated or complex, or of a highly technical nature, although not necessarily proprietary or unique to the petitioning organization; and
  • Payroll documents, federal or state wage statements, documentation of other forms of compensation, resumes, organizational charts or similar evidence documenting the positions held and the compensation provided to the beneficiary and parallel employees in the petitioning organization.

In addition to providing clearer guidance on the "specialized knowledge" standard, the memo addresses three other key issues in L-1B petitions.

Qualifying Employment

First, another key to a successful L-1B petition is a showing that the foreign national beneficiary worked abroad for a qualifying organization on a full-time basis for one continuous year within the preceding three years. The memo confirms though that the employment abroad could be in any of the three classifications as an executive, manager, or specialized knowledge employee, even if the beneficiary is seeking to enter the U.S. as a specialized knowledge employee.

Offsite L-1B Employment

Next, the memo addresses offsite L-1B employment in the context of the L-1 Visa Reform Act of 2004, which, in part, was designed to prevent the outsourcing of L-1B beneficiaries to third-party entities as "labor for hire". Where an L-1B beneficiary's primary worksite will be at the location of an employer who is not affiliated to the petitioner, it must be shown that the beneficiary (1) will not be "controlled and supervised principally" by the unaffiliated employer, and (2) will be placed "in connection with the provision of a product or service for which specialized knowledge specific to the petitioning employer is necessary."

The memo gives specific examples of actions that are permitted and not permitted in such offsite L-1B employment:

  • The petitioning company cannot simply supply workers and issue their paychecks in a "labor for hire" arrangement.
  • An unaffiliated employer is not necessarily prohibited from giving day-to-day assignments to the beneficiary, provided that, in the totality of the circumstances, the unaffiliated employer does not principally control and supervise the beneficiary's activities.
  • In an effort to prove that the unaffiliated employer does not maintain principal control and supervision over the beneficiary, the petitioner can show that it retains the principal authority to dictate the manner in which the work is to be performed, reward or discipline the beneficiary for their work performance, and provide the beneficiary's salary and any normal employer-provided benefits, such as health insurance.
  • The petitioner must show that an offisite L-1B worker will be using the specialized knowledge that served as the basis of the L-1B petition.

Readjudication of L-1B Status

Finally, and significantly, in the context of an L-1B extension petition involving the same petitioner and beneficiary, the memo instructs USCIS adjudicator's to give deference to the prior determination by approving L-1B classification. A re-examination of the petition should only occur where (1) there was a material error with regard to the previous approval, (2) there has been a substantial change in circumstance since the previous approval, or (3) there is new material information that adversely impact the petitioner's or beneficiary's eligibility.

This Policy Memorandum on L-1B Adjudications is long overdue and very much welcome by employers and their representatives. While not perfect, it goes a long way toward ensuring a fair and consistent review and adjudication of L-1B petitions by USCIS adjudications officers. The key will be how the memo and its guidance and instruction are followed and implemented in practice by the front-line adjudicators.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.