ARTICLE
26 August 2015

Is Superfund A Machine For Manufacturing Tea Party Members?

FH
Foley Hoag LLP

Contributor

Foley Hoag provides innovative, strategic legal services to public, private and government clients. We have premier capabilities in the life sciences, healthcare, technology, energy, professional services and private funds fields, and in cross-border disputes. The diverse experiences of our lawyers contribute to the exceptional senior-level service we deliver to clients.
A group of PRPs received an oversight cost bill pursuant to a CERCLA consent decree.
United States Environment

A group of PRPs received an oversight cost bill pursuant to a CERCLA consent decree.  (The following details are intentionally vague to protect both the innocent and the guilty.)  The bill was for several hundred thousand dollars.  During the year covered by the bill, the PRPs spent no money cleaning up the area of the site covered by the invoice.  They spent little or no money monitoring the area of the site covered by the invoice.  They spent no money preparing plans for the area of the site covered by the invoice.

It would be bad enough if EPA's oversight costs were of the same magnitude as the PRPs' direct response costs.  Unfortunately, EPA's oversight costs were more than the PRPs' direct costs.  Indeed, they were not just more than the PRPs' costs.  They were substantially, if not infinitely, more than the PRPs' costs.

And so I ask again:  Is Superfund a machine for manufacturing Tea Party members?

To view Foley Hoag's Law and the Environment Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More