United States: Initial Decision Finds That BP Manipulated 2008 Natural Gas Market In Texas

Last Updated: August 19 2015
Article by Sohair A. Aguirre, Doron F. Ezickson, Mary Treanor and Paul J. Pantano, Jr.

Most Read Contributor in United States, October 2018

On August 13, 2015, a  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC" or "Commission") Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") issued an initial decision in which she found that BP America Inc. et al. ("BP") manipulated the natural gas market in Texas for over two and a half months in 2008.1  ALJ Carmen A. Cintron concluded that BP intentionally sold large volumes of next-day, fixed-price physical gas to suppress the physical gas index to benefit BP's corresponding short financial positions, in violation of Section 4A of the Natural Gas Act and Section 1c.1 of the Commission's regulations.2  In addition, Judge Cintron determined that the Commission's Office of Enforcement staff ("Enforcement") proved that BP's alleged manipulative conduct fell within FERC's jurisdiction.3  Notably, the ALJ relied heavily on the Commission's penalty assessment against Barclays Bank PLC et al. ("Barclays") for alleged market manipulation—despite the fact that the proposed penalty currently is subject to de novo review in federal court.4  

As noted below, BP has announced that it intends to appeal the ALJ's decision.  It is possible that the FERC or a U.S. Court of Appeals may disagree with some or all of the ALJ's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

BP's Alleged Manipulative Scheme

Enforcement asserted that traders on BP's Southeast Gulf Texas team ("Texas Team") had a spread position comprised of short index exposure at Houston Ship Channel ("HSC") and long index exposure at Henry Hub.  This position benefited when the HSC-Henry Hub spread in daily physical gas prices widened.  Following Hurricane Ike on September 13, 2008, the Texas Team's spread earned significant profits because HSC prices plummeted in comparison to Henry Hub prices.5  Enforcement contended that following the hurricane and from September 18, 2008 through November 30, 2008 (the "Investigative Period"), the team took several coordinated, affirmative steps to slow the shrinkage of the spread by increasing its short exposure to the HSC Gas Daily index and increasing its physical natural gas positions to suppress the index. 

The ALJ concluded that a recorded November 5, 2008 phone call ("November call") between Texas Team traders Clayton Luskie and Grayden Comfort provided direct evidence of BP's manipulative conduct and intent.  In the call, Luskie asked "[s]o how would you explain our dealings on [Houston's Pipeline System] and with our paper position that don't make it sound like we're manipulating the index?"6  The ALJ emphasized Comfort's lack of a valid explanation for the trading, despite his significant trading experience and participation in the trading at issue, demonstrated his manipulative intent.7  The ALJ then held that this phone call, coupled with the Texas Team's changes in its trading conduct during the Investigative Period, sufficiently proved a scheme to manipulate natural gas prices. 

Judge Cintron cited the following changes in the Texas Team's trading as persuasive circumstantial evidence of manipulative intent:  

  • BP became the largest net seller of next-day, fixed-price physical gas at HSC despite a significant drop in prices in that market at the time;
  • The Texas Team sold most of BP's physical gas at HSC despite the option to sell at a higher price at Katy, another natural gas market; 
  • The Texas Team sold higher volumes of gas at HSC early in the trading day, when sales volumes had the biggest suppressive effect on prices;
  • The Texas Team sold at HSC by more frequently hitting bids—rather than posting offers at higher prices—than other market participants;
  • BP suffered sustained physical trading losses on HSC (in contrast to consistent profits on such trading before the Investigative Period);
  • The Texas Team bought early in the trading day at Katy to increase its net Katy long position, which enabled traders to sell and transport Katy gas to HSC for more HSC gas sales;
  • The Texas Team increased its use of BP's daily firm transportation capacity on the Houston Pipeline System to deliver gas from Katy to HSC despite their close proximity, which made the transportation uneconomical; and
  • The Trading Team added short HSC financial spread positions that benefited from suppressed prices on the HSC Gas Daily index and spread most of this exposure against long Henry Hub Gas Daily index exposure.

BP argued that Enforcement improperly compared BP's conduct during the Investigative Period with its conduct from January 2, 2008 through September 10, 2008 (the "Pre-IP").  BP asserted that the Pre-IP did not reflect several factors present during the Investigative Period that affected its trading, including seasonal changes, a higher baseload, the financial crisis, declining natural gas prices, and the hurricane.  BP also contended that Enforcement improperly analyzed end-of-day Gas Daily prices that did not account for intraday trading activity that the Texas Team observed and that it relied on flawed data inputs.8  The ALJ rejected BP's defenses and determined that BP failed to provide any valid explanations to rebut the circumstantial evidence that Enforcement presented.9

Reliance on the Barclays Case

The ALJ relied heavily on Barclays as support for her holding that BP engaged in manipulation, dismissing BP's contention that relying on Barclays is inappropriate because a federal court is reviewing the case de novo.10  She concluded that "[t]he fact that Barclays is currently in federal court does not diminish its precedential value at this time since that court has not yet ruled.  Additionally, so far a motion to dismiss has been denied by the court."11  The initial decision analyzed the Commission's examination of circumstantial evidence in Barclays and, citing to Barclays, emphasized as a significant factor that BP's trading conduct did not align with profit-seeking behavior.12  The ALJ then highlighted the significant decline in the Texas Team's financial performance on its next-day physical trading and its increased use of the Houston Pipeline System to transport gas despite the largely negative HSC-Katy price spread.

BP's Purportedly Ineffective Compliance Program

The ALJ concluded that BP lacked sufficient compliance procedures to warrant a compliance credit under the Penalty Guidelines because it allegedly failed to prevent and detect the manipulation, failed to effectively investigate the Texas Team's behavior, and lacked the minimum standards of a robust compliance program.13  She emphasized the following findings to support this conclusion:

  • BP's compliance reports to identify manipulation excluded specific markers of manipulation, such as positions and traders' profits and losses;
  • BP Compliance personnel did not always follow up on questionable reports, including Comfort's trader anomaly report during the Investigative Period;
  • BP lacked effective high-level oversight of its internal compliance;
  • The Texas Teams' primary compliance analyst did not take the purported manipulation seriously in the days after the November call;
  • BP Compliance failed to take reasonable steps to screen for "bad actors";
  • BP's anti-manipulation compliance trainings did not appear to address physical for financial manipulation;
  • BP did not regularly evaluate its compliance program or take advantage of its frequent manager meetings to review the program;
  • BP did not encourage its employees to comply with anti-manipulation rules and compensated its financial gas traders at a higher rate than its physical gas traders; and
  • BP failed to take reasonable steps after detecting the alleged manipulation and stopped its internal review of the November call before it was completed.14

Some of the foregoing facts relied upon by the ALJ, such as BP's compensation system, seem to encroach on BP's judgment about how it wants to run its business.


Although the Commission will assess penalties at a later time, the ALJ determined that the record supports the $48 million penalty amount requested by Enforcement.15  Moreover, Judge Cintron concluded that BP's penalty may be enhanced because BP was the subject of three prior adjudications within the past five years, including settlements for propane manipulation with the Department of Justice and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission one year before the conduct at issue in this case.16  Following the initial decision, BP announced that it "strongly disagreed" with the ALJ's findings and that it will appeal to the full Commission.  Absent an extension, BP must submit a brief on any exceptions to the Commission within 30 days of the initial decision.17


1 B.P. America Inc. et al., 152 FERC ¶ 63,016 (Aug. 13, 2015) ("Initial Decision").

2 15 U.S.C. § 717c-1 (2012) and 18 C.F.R. § 1c.1 (2014) prohibit manipulation of natural gas markets and require evidence that sufficiently demonstrates manipulative conduct, scienter, and the Commission's jurisdiction.  BP America Inc. et al., 147 FERC ¶ 61,130 (2014) ("Hearing Order").  

3 The ALJ held that Enforcement "proved jurisdiction through third party transactions priced off the HSC Gas Daily index, cash-out transactions priced off the same index and BP's own next-day, fixed-price sales of gas at HSC made to suppress the HSC Gas Daily index."  Initial Decision at P 277.   

4 See Barclays, 144 FERC ¶ 61,041 at P 149 (2013); and FERC v. Barclays Bank PLC et al., Docket No. 13-2093, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California.  

5 Initial Decision at P 7. 

6 Id.  at P 101.

7 Id. at P 104. 

8 Initial Decision at PP 13 - 27.

9 Id. at PP 32 - 82.

10 Id. at PP 22, 33, n. 11.

11 Id.  at P 33, n. 11.  The ALJ reasoned that the anti-manipulation rules applicable in the electric and natural gas markets are identical. 

12 Id.  at P 81.

13 Initial Decision at P 264.  See also Revised Policy Statement on Penalty Guidelines, 132 FERC ¶ 61,216 (2010) ("Penalty Guidelines").

14 Initial Decision at PP 241-264.

15 Id. at P 187.

16 Id. at P 214.  See also Penalty Guidelines.

17 18 C.F.R. § 385.711(a) (2006).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions