United States: Initial Decision Finds That BP Manipulated 2008 Natural Gas Market In Texas

On August 13, 2015, a  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC" or "Commission") Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") issued an initial decision in which she found that BP America Inc. et al. ("BP") manipulated the natural gas market in Texas for over two and a half months in 2008.1  ALJ Carmen A. Cintron concluded that BP intentionally sold large volumes of next-day, fixed-price physical gas to suppress the physical gas index to benefit BP's corresponding short financial positions, in violation of Section 4A of the Natural Gas Act and Section 1c.1 of the Commission's regulations.2  In addition, Judge Cintron determined that the Commission's Office of Enforcement staff ("Enforcement") proved that BP's alleged manipulative conduct fell within FERC's jurisdiction.3  Notably, the ALJ relied heavily on the Commission's penalty assessment against Barclays Bank PLC et al. ("Barclays") for alleged market manipulation—despite the fact that the proposed penalty currently is subject to de novo review in federal court.4  

As noted below, BP has announced that it intends to appeal the ALJ's decision.  It is possible that the FERC or a U.S. Court of Appeals may disagree with some or all of the ALJ's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

BP's Alleged Manipulative Scheme

Enforcement asserted that traders on BP's Southeast Gulf Texas team ("Texas Team") had a spread position comprised of short index exposure at Houston Ship Channel ("HSC") and long index exposure at Henry Hub.  This position benefited when the HSC-Henry Hub spread in daily physical gas prices widened.  Following Hurricane Ike on September 13, 2008, the Texas Team's spread earned significant profits because HSC prices plummeted in comparison to Henry Hub prices.5  Enforcement contended that following the hurricane and from September 18, 2008 through November 30, 2008 (the "Investigative Period"), the team took several coordinated, affirmative steps to slow the shrinkage of the spread by increasing its short exposure to the HSC Gas Daily index and increasing its physical natural gas positions to suppress the index. 

The ALJ concluded that a recorded November 5, 2008 phone call ("November call") between Texas Team traders Clayton Luskie and Grayden Comfort provided direct evidence of BP's manipulative conduct and intent.  In the call, Luskie asked "[s]o how would you explain our dealings on [Houston's Pipeline System] and with our paper position that don't make it sound like we're manipulating the index?"6  The ALJ emphasized Comfort's lack of a valid explanation for the trading, despite his significant trading experience and participation in the trading at issue, demonstrated his manipulative intent.7  The ALJ then held that this phone call, coupled with the Texas Team's changes in its trading conduct during the Investigative Period, sufficiently proved a scheme to manipulate natural gas prices. 

Judge Cintron cited the following changes in the Texas Team's trading as persuasive circumstantial evidence of manipulative intent:  

  • BP became the largest net seller of next-day, fixed-price physical gas at HSC despite a significant drop in prices in that market at the time;
  • The Texas Team sold most of BP's physical gas at HSC despite the option to sell at a higher price at Katy, another natural gas market; 
  • The Texas Team sold higher volumes of gas at HSC early in the trading day, when sales volumes had the biggest suppressive effect on prices;
  • The Texas Team sold at HSC by more frequently hitting bids—rather than posting offers at higher prices—than other market participants;
  • BP suffered sustained physical trading losses on HSC (in contrast to consistent profits on such trading before the Investigative Period);
  • The Texas Team bought early in the trading day at Katy to increase its net Katy long position, which enabled traders to sell and transport Katy gas to HSC for more HSC gas sales;
  • The Texas Team increased its use of BP's daily firm transportation capacity on the Houston Pipeline System to deliver gas from Katy to HSC despite their close proximity, which made the transportation uneconomical; and
  • The Trading Team added short HSC financial spread positions that benefited from suppressed prices on the HSC Gas Daily index and spread most of this exposure against long Henry Hub Gas Daily index exposure.

BP argued that Enforcement improperly compared BP's conduct during the Investigative Period with its conduct from January 2, 2008 through September 10, 2008 (the "Pre-IP").  BP asserted that the Pre-IP did not reflect several factors present during the Investigative Period that affected its trading, including seasonal changes, a higher baseload, the financial crisis, declining natural gas prices, and the hurricane.  BP also contended that Enforcement improperly analyzed end-of-day Gas Daily prices that did not account for intraday trading activity that the Texas Team observed and that it relied on flawed data inputs.8  The ALJ rejected BP's defenses and determined that BP failed to provide any valid explanations to rebut the circumstantial evidence that Enforcement presented.9

Reliance on the Barclays Case

The ALJ relied heavily on Barclays as support for her holding that BP engaged in manipulation, dismissing BP's contention that relying on Barclays is inappropriate because a federal court is reviewing the case de novo.10  She concluded that "[t]he fact that Barclays is currently in federal court does not diminish its precedential value at this time since that court has not yet ruled.  Additionally, so far a motion to dismiss has been denied by the court."11  The initial decision analyzed the Commission's examination of circumstantial evidence in Barclays and, citing to Barclays, emphasized as a significant factor that BP's trading conduct did not align with profit-seeking behavior.12  The ALJ then highlighted the significant decline in the Texas Team's financial performance on its next-day physical trading and its increased use of the Houston Pipeline System to transport gas despite the largely negative HSC-Katy price spread.

BP's Purportedly Ineffective Compliance Program

The ALJ concluded that BP lacked sufficient compliance procedures to warrant a compliance credit under the Penalty Guidelines because it allegedly failed to prevent and detect the manipulation, failed to effectively investigate the Texas Team's behavior, and lacked the minimum standards of a robust compliance program.13  She emphasized the following findings to support this conclusion:

  • BP's compliance reports to identify manipulation excluded specific markers of manipulation, such as positions and traders' profits and losses;
  • BP Compliance personnel did not always follow up on questionable reports, including Comfort's trader anomaly report during the Investigative Period;
  • BP lacked effective high-level oversight of its internal compliance;
  • The Texas Teams' primary compliance analyst did not take the purported manipulation seriously in the days after the November call;
  • BP Compliance failed to take reasonable steps to screen for "bad actors";
  • BP's anti-manipulation compliance trainings did not appear to address physical for financial manipulation;
  • BP did not regularly evaluate its compliance program or take advantage of its frequent manager meetings to review the program;
  • BP did not encourage its employees to comply with anti-manipulation rules and compensated its financial gas traders at a higher rate than its physical gas traders; and
  • BP failed to take reasonable steps after detecting the alleged manipulation and stopped its internal review of the November call before it was completed.14

Some of the foregoing facts relied upon by the ALJ, such as BP's compensation system, seem to encroach on BP's judgment about how it wants to run its business.


Although the Commission will assess penalties at a later time, the ALJ determined that the record supports the $48 million penalty amount requested by Enforcement.15  Moreover, Judge Cintron concluded that BP's penalty may be enhanced because BP was the subject of three prior adjudications within the past five years, including settlements for propane manipulation with the Department of Justice and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission one year before the conduct at issue in this case.16  Following the initial decision, BP announced that it "strongly disagreed" with the ALJ's findings and that it will appeal to the full Commission.  Absent an extension, BP must submit a brief on any exceptions to the Commission within 30 days of the initial decision.17


1 B.P. America Inc. et al., 152 FERC ¶ 63,016 (Aug. 13, 2015) ("Initial Decision").

2 15 U.S.C. § 717c-1 (2012) and 18 C.F.R. § 1c.1 (2014) prohibit manipulation of natural gas markets and require evidence that sufficiently demonstrates manipulative conduct, scienter, and the Commission's jurisdiction.  BP America Inc. et al., 147 FERC ¶ 61,130 (2014) ("Hearing Order").  

3 The ALJ held that Enforcement "proved jurisdiction through third party transactions priced off the HSC Gas Daily index, cash-out transactions priced off the same index and BP's own next-day, fixed-price sales of gas at HSC made to suppress the HSC Gas Daily index."  Initial Decision at P 277.   

4 See Barclays, 144 FERC ¶ 61,041 at P 149 (2013); and FERC v. Barclays Bank PLC et al., Docket No. 13-2093, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California.  

5 Initial Decision at P 7. 

6 Id.  at P 101.

7 Id. at P 104. 

8 Initial Decision at PP 13 - 27.

9 Id. at PP 32 - 82.

10 Id. at PP 22, 33, n. 11.

11 Id.  at P 33, n. 11.  The ALJ reasoned that the anti-manipulation rules applicable in the electric and natural gas markets are identical. 

12 Id.  at P 81.

13 Initial Decision at P 264.  See also Revised Policy Statement on Penalty Guidelines, 132 FERC ¶ 61,216 (2010) ("Penalty Guidelines").

14 Initial Decision at PP 241-264.

15 Id. at P 187.

16 Id. at P 214.  See also Penalty Guidelines.

17 18 C.F.R. § 385.711(a) (2006).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.