United States: Tenth Circuit Employs "Animal Farm" Rule Of Insurance Policy Interpretation, Finding Some Words Are More Equal Than Others

Last Updated: August 18 2015
Article by Harry J. Moren

In George Orwell's Animal Farm, the governing principle that "All animals are equal" was revised by the pigs, who had ascended into power, to "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." A recent decision by the Tenth Circuit (applying Kansas law), BancInsure v. FDIC, appears to apply a similar principle of insurance policy interpretation, finding that the plain meaning of one policy provision may trump the equally plain meaning of another conflicting provision. This is a departure from well settled rules governing how courts interpret insurance policies. Among those rules are that where there is no ambiguity, courts are to apply a provision's plain and ordinary meaning. However, courts are to read the policy as a whole and cannot interpret one policy provision (even if it is clear) in a way that would render another provision meaningless (because all words in a policy are equal). Where the plain meaning of two or more policy provisions conflict, the policy is ambiguous and the court must adopt a reasonable reading that favors coverage. Instead of employing these rules to resolve an ambiguity in the D&O policy at issue, the court in BancInsure gave effect to one provision that excluded coverage, even though doing so required it to disregard another clear provision that would have allowed coverage—effectively deciding that "all words are equal, but some words are more equal than others."

BancInsure is a failed bank case similar to a class of cases we wrote about earlier this year. As we discussed here, there is a growing consensus among courts finding that the insured versus insured exclusion in D&O policies does not bar coverage for claims brought by a receiver of a failed bank against the bank's directors and officers. The cases involve a similar fact pattern. After a bank fails (as many did in the wake of the credit crisis), the FDIC is appointed as receiver. The FDIC then brings claims against certain officers and directors of the failed bank alleging mismanagement. When the officers and directors tender their claims to the bank's D&O insurer, the insurers reflexively deny coverage based on the insured versus insured exclusion—a provision that, as its name suggests, precludes coverage for claims by one insured against another. The provision is intended to protect insurers from covering allegedly collusive suits where a company sues its own officers and directors for alleged poor business decisions in an attempt to recover its losses by tapping the proceeds of its D&O policies. In the failed bank cases, although the FDIC is not an insured, the insurers argue that the insured versus insured exclusion applies because the FDIC has "stepped into the shoes" of the failed bank. Courts increasingly have rejected such arguments and allowed coverage, finding the insured versus insured exclusion to be ambiguous with regard to claims brought by the FDIC.

In BancInsure, the Tenth Circuit appears—at least at first blush—to have bucked this trend, finding in its August 6, 2015 opinion that the insured versus insured exclusion in Colombian Bank & Trust's D&O policy excluded coverage for the FDIC's claim against three of the bank's former directors. However, a closer inspection of BancInsure reveals that the Tenth Circuit relied on unique language in the particular insured versus insured exclusion at issue, which barred coverage for claims made against an Insured Person by "a receiver" of the Bank. This is the very language that other courts have noted insurers could have included in their policies to clear up the ambiguity but did not. Thus, at least with respect to the Tenth Circuit's interpretation of the language of the insured versus insured exclusion, BancInsure is not a departure from the trend in policyholders' favor.

But, as alluded to at the beginning of this post, there is another problem lurking in the Tenth Circuit's reasoning. The court bases its decision on what it refers to as the "plain meaning" of the insured versus insured exclusion. Yet in doing so, it ignores the plain meaning of another provision that directly contradicts the insured versus insured exclusion. The court recites the familiar rules of policy interpretation—that the primary rule in interpreting an insurance policy is to ascertain the intent of the parties; that in doing so, courts consider the policy as a whole, rather than viewing provisions in isolation; that where policy language is unambiguous, courts apply its plain and ordinary meaning; but where policy language is ambiguous, courts adopt the construction most favorable to the insured. Moreover, the court acknowledges that a policy is ambiguous if it "contains provisions" of "conflicting meaning." In other words, even if the language of a particular provision is clear, ambiguity is created when another provision conflicts with it.

Against this backdrop, the Tenth Circuit's decision denying coverage to Colombian Bank & Trust's former directors is puzzling. The D&O policy originally included a so-called "regulatory exclusion" precluding coverage for any action brought by a regulatory agency or "deposit insurance organization" (i.e., the FDIC), including "any type of legal action which any such Agency may bring as receiver." However, the Bank purchased an endorsement which amended the policy by deleting the regulatory exclusion and setting a $5 million sublimit for claims brought by "any federal or state regulatory or supervisory agency or deposit insurance organization." Thus, the plain language of the endorsement expressly allowed coverage (subject to a sublimit) of claims brought by the FDIC (including "as receiver"), while the insured versus insured exclusion expressly barred claims by "a receiver of the company." Because these two provisions conflict, the court should have found that the policy was ambiguous and adopted the construction most favorable to the insured. Instead, the court found that the plain language of the insured versus insured exclusion trumped equally clear language in the regulatory coverage endorsement, i.e., that some provisions are more equal than others. But giving effect to the plain language of one provision that excludes coverage when doing so requires a court to ignore the plain language of another provision that allows coverage is precisely the opposite of what the rules of policy interpretation require.

BancInsure serves as another reminder to policyholders to read their policies closely at the time of renewal and understand what they are buying. No doubt Colombian Bank & Trust believed when it purchased an endorsement removing the regulatory exclusion that it was buying coverage for claims by regulatory agencies such as the FDIC. Indeed, the BancInsure marketing materials provided to the Bank explained that "there is full coverage for actions by regulatory agencies" under the regulatory endorsement. Nevertheless, a close reading of the policy at the time it was issued could have revealed the conflicting language in the insured versus insured exclusion. Although the rules of policy construction are supposed to resolve such a conflict in the policyholder's favor, BancInsure highlights the point that it is better to clear up the ambiguity at the time the policy is issued than to hope that a court will clear it up in your favor later.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
21 Nov 2018, Seminar, New York, United States

“Big data” is changing our economy. It has allowed Amazon, Google, Facebook and many others to redesign traditional business models and to create new or improved products and services with greater utility for consumers and often at very little cost.

24 Nov 2018, Speaking Engagement, New York, United States

Each year, the New York Region of IFA hosts a panel and reception at the NYU Law School. This year’s panel will include a discussion of the TCJA international provisions.

27 Nov 2018, Speaking Engagement, New York, United States

Employment Managing Associates, Alexandra Stathpoulos and Alexandra Heifetz are presenting at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law’s FORM+FUND Series.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions