ARTICLE
18 August 2015

If You Smoke Pot, You Can Still Get Fired

FP
Fisher Phillips LLP

Contributor

Fisher Phillips LLP logo
Fisher Phillips LLP is a national law firm committed to providing practical business solutions for employers’ workplace legal problems. Labor and employment law is all the firm does, offering deep and broad knowledge and experience in the area of the law the attorneys know best. Fisher Phillips attorneys help clients avoid legal problems, are dedicated to providing exceptional client service, and are there when you need them. The firm has over 400 attorneys in 34 offices with 33 locations. Learn more at www.fisherphillips.com.
Catharine Morisset's article "If You Smoke Pot, you Can Still Get Fired" was featured in Avvo Naked Law on August 13, 2015.
United States Employment and HR

Catharine Morisset’s article “If You Smoke Pot, you Can Still Get Fired” was featured in Avvo Naked Law on August 13, 2015.

Federal law says that pot is as dangerous as heroin, more addictive than cocaine, and has no accepted medical purpose. Yet 23 states and DC have legalized medical marijuana in some form. Alaska, Colorado, Oregon, Washington, and D.C. have also de-criminalized recreational marijuana use. For the average worker – and their employers – this federal-state law paradox can have huge impact in the workplace.

Many employers, for instance, still choose to conduct workplace drug testing in various contexts (such as making it a condition of an employment offer), and “zero tolerance” policies remain valid. Despite numerous attempts to challenge that standard, pro-marijuana laws have had little impact on an employer’s ability to drug test or to terminate employees for marijuana use.

Some examples:

  • In Ross v. Ragingwire Telecommunications, Inc., California’s highest court found that the state’s medical marijuana law protects individuals only from criminal prosecution, ruling in favor of an employer who declined to hire an injured vet taking medical marijuana to treat chronic back pain after he failed his pre-employment drug test.
  • Oregon’s Supreme Court, in Emerald Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor and Industries similarly found for an employer who fired a heavy-machine operator who had used medical marijuana to treat muscle spasms during the two weeks before a drug test.
  • In 2011, in Roe v. Teletech, Washington State’s highest court upheld the termination of a medical marijuana user for a non-safety-sensitive position, even when she disclosed her valid prescription before being asked to take the pre-employment drug test. The court rationalized there was no clear public policy protecting employees from termination even for lawful home use because Washington’s law provided only a defense to criminal prosecution.

To read the full article, please visit Avvo Naked Law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More