United States: Fifth Circuit Rejects SOX Whistleblower Claims Not Raised In Administrative Complaint; Adopts Liberal "Reasonable Belief" Pleading Standard With Respect To Protected Conduct

Executive Summary: On July 31, 2015, the Fifth Circuit issued a decision that may have both a positive and negative impact on employers defending whistleblower retaliation claims under the Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX). In this decision, the court held that a former employee could not proceed with the portion of his whistleblower retaliation claim that was based on protected activity he did not identify in his administrative complaint to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). However, the court reinstated the former employee's claims that were based on activity that he did report in his administrative complaint, finding that the lower court applied an overly restrictive pleading requirement in dismissing the claims. The Fifth Circuit adopted the more liberal pleading standard established by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) Administrative Review Board (ARB) in May 2011 – rendering it far easier for whistleblowers to advance their retaliation claims beyond the pleading stage, into the discovery phase, and potentially on to trial by jury.

Alleged Whistleblower Activity

In this case, the former employee of a wholly-owned subsidiary of a publicly traded company claimed that while performing his job duties in 2008 and 2009, he investigated and internally reported fraudulent pricing and accounting schemes that inflated the company's profitability by treating tax collections as revenues. The former employee claimed that his supervisors and other company officials retaliated against him for reporting these issues, and that he memorialized his concerns about the retaliation on compliance forms he submitted in 2008 and 2009, but the company did not investigate his retaliation claims when he was targeted for discharge. The former employee also claimed that just before he was terminated, he learned of circumstances suggesting that the company was engaged in wire fraud and antitrust violations, which he reported to the general counsel, although he had no opportunity to fully investigate them.

DOL/OSHA Administrative Complaint Procedure

The former employee filed an administrative complaint with OSHA as required by the SOX whistleblower provision; however, he failed to include many of the detailed allegations included in his subsequent federal court complaint. Specifically, his complaint to OSHA did not include his alleged reporting of illegal price signaling, inconsistent customer discounts, and wire fraud. In October 2010, OSHA issued a determination letter finding that the former employee's protected activity was not a contributing factor in the decision to terminate his employment. The former employee subsequently terminated the OSHA proceedings and filed a lawsuit against his former employer in federal court.

Implications of the Administrative Exhaustion Rule

The allegations in the federal court complaint went beyond those raised in the complaint to OSHA. The former employee argued that because SOX gives federal courts subject matter jurisdiction to conduct de novo review, the courts are not limited by the underlying administrative charge. Both the trial court and the Fifth Circuit disagreed, holding that just as Title VII claims are limited in scope to the EEOC investigation that can reasonably be expected to grow out of the administrative charge, so too a federal court's de novo review jurisdiction over SOX whistleblower claims is limited in scope to the OSHA investigation that can reasonably be expected to grow out of the administrative complaint. Because the former employee did not allege in his OSHA complaint that he was discriminated against because he reported that the company had engaged in wire fraud activities, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the trial court's dismissal of those claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

The New Pleading Standard Adopted by the Fifth Circuit

However, the Fifth Circuit reinstated other claims made by the former employee that he raised in his administrative complaint, finding that the trial court applied an overly restrictive pleading requirement in dismissing the claims. The Fifth Circuit held that the lower court should have utilized the more lenient standard adopted by the ARB in 2011.

Before the 2011 decision, the ARB required complaining individuals to show, among other things, that they engaged in protected activity that related "definitely and specifically" to one or more categories of criminal fraud or securities violations enumerated in the statute. Most federal courts endorsed this standard in evaluating SOX whistleblower claims. However, in 2011 the ARB rejected the "definite and specific relation standard," finding it inconsistent with the SOX whistleblower provision which prohibits a publicly traded company from discharging or in any other manner discriminating against an employee for providing information regarding conduct that the employee "reasonably believes" constitutes a SOX violation. The ARB further held that federal court pleading standards do not apply in administrative hearings and that the critical focus at the preliminary review stage in a SOX whistleblower retaliation case is whether the complainant reported conduct he or she reasonably believed constituted a violation of federal law. The ARB held that even conclusory allegations will satisfy the complainant's burden at the initial stages and entitle him or her to move forward with discovery.

The lower court dismissed the balance of the former employee's whistleblower claims under the "definite and specific" pleading standard; however, the Fifth Circuit reversed this decision and reinstated this portion of the complaint. The Fifth Circuit held that from this point forward, it will follow the new liberal pleading standard adopted by the ARB in 2011 as consistent with the text of the statute.

Significance of this Ruling

With this decision, the Fifth Circuit (with jurisdiction over federal district courts in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas) joins a few other federal appeals courts, including the Second Circuit (with jurisdiction over federal district courts in Connecticut, New York and Vermont), the Third Circuit (with jurisdiction over federal district courts in Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania), and the Sixth Circuit (with jurisdiction over federal district courts in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee) in endorsing the new standard articulated by the ARB in May 2011. This will likely make it more difficult for employers in these jurisdictions to get whistleblower retaliation complaints dismissed short of trial. In districts where the courts of appeal have not issued a definitive ruling on whether they will follow the ARB's standard, district courts take varying positions on whether the standard applies. Accordingly, many employers outside the Fifth, Second, Third and Sixth Circuits may continue to argue in good faith that the definite and specific standard should apply in evaluating the sufficiency of a SOX complaint, and ultimately whether an employee's alleged communication states a cognizable claim for relief under the SOX whistleblower provision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions