United States: 'Authority' To Terminate Financing Statements Under UCC

On Jan. 21, in Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Motors Liquidation v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (In re Motors Liquidation), No. 13-2187, (2d Cir. Jan. 21, 2015), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed whether a UCC-3 termination statement, which was improperly filed as part of the repayment of an unrelated loan, may be considered effective to terminate the security interest in question, even where none of the parties intended that result. After receiving guidance from the Delaware Supreme Court, to which a portion of the legal issues implicated in this case had been certified for opinion, the appellate court held that even though none of the parties intended for the security interest in question to be terminated, the filing of the termination statement was nevertheless effective.


This case is one of many that stems from the General Motors bankruptcy case, and relates to two large loans entered into by GM before its bankruptcy filing. In October 2001, GM entered into a synthetic lease financing transaction, whereby it obtained $300 million in financing from a syndicate of lenders, which included JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMC) as a lender and as administrative agent for the loan. The synthetic lease was secured by liens on 12 pieces of real estate owned by GM. In 2006, GM entered into a term loan facility, whereby it obtained $1.5 billion in financing from a different syndicate of lenders, but one that also included JPMC as administrative agent. The term loan was secured by a large variety of GM's assets. UCC-1 financing statements were filed in connection with the synthetic lease and the term loan in order to effectuate a perfection of the lenders' security interests in their respective items of collateral. One such financing statement related to the $1.5 billion term loan, bearing file number 6416808, was filed with the Delaware secretary of state and covered all of GM's equipment and fixtures at 42 different facilities (the Main Term Loan UCC-1). The Main Term Loan UCC-1 was considered "by far the most important" of the financing statements filed in connection with the term loan.

As the synthetic lease neared maturity in September 2008, GM contacted its counsel responsible for the synthetic lease, and informed it that GM planned to repay the synthetic lease loan facility in full. GM requested that its counsel prepare the documents necessary to evidence repayment of the synthetic lease loan facility, as well as the documents that would accomplish a release of the lenders' security interest in the collateral covering the synthetic lease loan facility. GM's counsel, through a paralegal unfamiliar with the details of the transaction, conducted a UCC search for financing statements that had been recorded against GM in Delaware. This search identified three UCC-1 financing statements, including the Main Term Loan UCC-1, which had been filed in connection with the term loan.

GM's counsel prepared a closing checklist for the termination of the synthetic lease, and identified the Main Term Loan UCC-1 along with the other financing statements related to the synthetic lease for termination, and prepared a UCC-3 statement terminating the Main Term Loan UCC-1. Copies of the closing checklist were sent to a managing director at JPMC, who was responsible for the repayment of the synthetic lease, and who had signed the term loan documents on JPMC's behalf. JPMC's counsel was also sent copies of the closing checklist, the draft UCC-3 termination statements and other closing documents, some of which required JPMC's counsel's signature. Everyone who reviewed these documents approved them for inclusion at closing.

Unfortunately, no one realized that the UCC-3 purporting to terminate the Main Term Loan UCC-1 was improperly included in the documents related to the repayment of the synthetic lease. When the proper UCC-3 termination notices were filed in connection with the repayment of the synthetic lease, the UCC-3 terminating the Main Term Loan UCC-1 was filed as well.

GM filed for bankruptcy in 2009 and, until that time, the termination of the Main Term Loan UCC-1 had gone unnoticed. After the bankruptcy filing, JPMC informed the committee of unsecured creditors that the Main Term Loan UCC-1 had been unintentionally terminated and that, because the termination was unauthorized, it was ineffective. On July 31, 2009, the committee commenced an adversary proceeding against JPMC seeking a determination that the inadvertently-recorded termination statement was nonetheless effective to terminate the Main Term Loan UCC-1, rendering JPMC an unsecured creditor on par with the other unsecured creditors of GM.

As with all bankruptcy filings, GM's bankruptcy filing had the effect of granting the trustee or debtor-in-possession the status of a hypothetical lien creditor with a blanket lien on all of the debtor's assets. Because the offending UCC-3 termination statement was filed before GM's petition date, but this error was not discovered until after the petition date, JPMC was barred from attempting to re-perfect its security interest in the assets secured by the Main Term Loan UCC-1 once the bankruptcy case was filed.

Court Ruling, Parties' Arguments on Appeal

In the bankruptcy court, the committee argued that despite the fact that the filing of the UCC-3 termination statement purporting to terminate the Main Term Loan UCC-1 was in error, the termination of the Main Term Loan UCC-1 was nevertheless effective. JPMC disagreed, arguing instead that because no one at GM, JPMC, or their respective law firms intended that the Main Term Loan UCC-1 be terminated, the filing of the UCC-3 termination statement with respect to that financing statement was unauthorized and, consequently, ineffective. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the bankruptcy court sided with JPMC and concluded that the filing of the UCC-3 termination statement with respect to the Main Term Loan UCC-1 was not effective to terminate JPMC's security interest in the collateral identified in the Main Term Loan UCC-1.

The bankruptcy court decision was certified for appeal by the committee to the Second Circuit. The parties on appeal offered differing interpretations of UCC Section 9-509(d)(1), which provides that a UCC-3 termination statement is effective only if "the secured party of record authorizes the filing." JPMC argued that it could not have "authorized" the filing of the incorrect UCC-3 termination statement, because it never intended to terminate the security interest secured by the Main Term Loan UCC-1. Conversely, the committee argued that JPMC's subjective intent was irrelevant, and that the filing was "authorized" because JPMC had, in fact, authorized (albeit unwittingly) the filing of the UCC-3 termination statement. According to the committee, JPMC literally "authorized the filing" when it told its counsel to file the documents that included the improper UCC-3 termination statement.

The Court's Analysis

The Second Circuit was faced with "two closely related questions," namely, "first, what precisely must a secured lender of record authorize for a UCC-3 termination statement to be effective," and second, whether JPMC gave its counsel the relevant authority to file the offending UCC-3 termination statement. The court recognized that the first question was more appropriately addressed by the Delaware Supreme Court, as a matter of Delaware state law, and therefore certified this question to the Delaware Supreme Court, reserving for itself the second question.

The Delaware Supreme Court responded to the certified question by stating that, under Delaware law, if a secured party authorizes a filing to be made, then that filing is effective regardless of what the secured party subjectively intends or understands the outcome of that filing to be. The Delaware Supreme Court went on to state that the Delaware Uniform Commercial Code contains no provision that requires the secured party to understand the effect of its own filing.

With the requisite guidance from the Delaware Supreme Court on the first question, the Second Circuit went on to answer the second question implicated by the appeal, namely whether JPMC's actions were sufficient to "authorize" the filing of the UCC-3 termination statement that purported to terminate the Main Term Loan UCC-1. The court found that, despite the fact that no one at GM, JPMC, or their respective law firms took any action intended to affect the Main Term Loan UCC-1, JPMC had nevertheless "authorized the filing" by reviewing the documents related to the repayment of the synthetic lease (which inadvertently included the UCC-3 terminating the Main Term Loan UCC-1), and agreeing that those documents be filed.

A Cautionary Tale

The result in this case should serve as a cautionary tale to all secured parties and their counsel, underscored by the ever-present possibility that a borrower file for bankruptcy protection. A mistake on the part of counsel will not excuse the filing of an improper document, especially where all parties and their counsel have an opportunity to review the relevant documents, and sign off on their filing. The subsequent bankruptcy filing, with a trustee or debtor-in-possession empowered to relegate an unwitting secured creditor to unsecured creditor status, turned out to be a real game-changer under these circumstances.

This case presents a classic example of the tragedy of the commons, where everyone involved appeared to be relying on the review and diligence of the other parties, to disastrous effect for the secured party. Consequently, in order to protect its interests, a secured party and its counsel must conduct a detailed, rather than a cursory, review of any documentation filed on its behalf. Failure to do so could lead to an outcome that no one intended or anticipated.

This article originally appeared in The Legal Intelligencer.

Rudolph J. Di Massa, Jr., a partner at Duane Morris, is a member of the business reorganization and financial restructuring practice group. He concentrates his practice in the areas of commercial litigation and creditors' rights. Catherine B. Heitzenrater is an associate with the firm and practices in the area of business reorganization and financial restructuring. She graduated in 2007 from Boston College Law School. She is admitted to practice in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions