ARTICLE
5 August 2015

In Re Jones

SK
Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC

Contributor

In boardrooms and courtrooms, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC provides strategic legal counsel to clients in the Midwestern United States, across the country and around the world. Our attorneys are recognized among the best in their fields by Martindale-Hubbell, Best Lawyers in America and Benchmark Litigation. We build client relationships for the long haul, because succeeding at business is a marathon, not a sprint.
The bankruptcy court revisits the issue of the appropriate cramdown interest rate to apply in a Chapter 13 plan. The court holds that the "formula approach," as set forth in the plurality opinion in Till, determines the correct rate.
United States Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

(Bankr. E.D. Ky. Aug. 3, 2015)

The bankruptcy court revisits the issue of the appropriate cramdown interest rate to apply in a Chapter 13 plan. The court holds that the "formula approach," as set forth in the plurality opinion in Till, determines the correct rate. The debtor's plan proposed to pay the secured creditor's claim with interest at 5.25% (2% over the Wall Street Journal prime rate). The creditor argued that Till was not binding and that prior Sixth Circuit law provided the appropriate standard. The court provides a good discussion of the history of Till and its application in the Sixth Circuit and concludes that the "formula approach" is the correct standard. Opinion below.

2015-08-03 – in re jones

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More