United States: State AGs In The News - July 30th, 2015


Federal Appeals Court Focuses on Utah Contact Lens Law

  • Leading national manufacturers of contact lenses are asking the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse a lower court decision not to enjoin enforcement of a new Utah law on vertical price controls in the contact lens industry. On June 16, the Tenth Circuit removed the temporary injunction pending appeal it had issued in May, and allowed the law to go into effect. The court's ruling on the preliminary injunction has been expedited, and both sides have filed their briefs.
  • The law was enacted earlier this year and bans contact lens manufacturers and distributors from "fixing or otherwise controlling the price that a contact lens retailer charges or advertises for contact lenses." The law specifically prohibits a manufacturer from discriminating against a contact lens retailer that sells or advertises contact lenses for a particular price; operates in a particular channel of trade; is a person authorized by law to prescribe contact lenses; or is associated with a person authorized by law to prescribe contact lenses.
  • Utah AG Sean Reyes argued that the new law is a legitimate antitrust measure and would benefit consumers by encouraging greater price competition. In contrast, national contact lens manufacturers argued that the law violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution because it effectively seeks to regulate interstate commerce, stating that "it will necessarily result in [a] Utah retailer receiving a competitive advantage over the non-Utah retailers who abide by the [unilateral pricing] policies."


Citizens United Loses in Federal Court, Must Disclose Donors

  • In Citizens United v. Schneiderman, a federal court in New York ruled that a State AG can require charitable organizations to disclose a list of major donors as part of the organization's annual reporting requirements under state law.
  • The plaintiffs, Citizens United Foundation and Citizens United, two nonprofit corporations, sought to enjoin New York AG Eric Schneiderman from enforcing state Exec. Law §172, requiring charities registered in New York to disclose the names of donors who gave $5,000 or more by providing a copy of each entity's confidential "Schedule B" filings that accompany federal tax returns.
  • The court indicated that this type of disclosure forms an important part of a State AG's investigative authority "because he can compare major donor information against other documents that charities submit, allowing him to uncover possible violations and ultimately take action against unlawful charities." This decision mirrors recent decisions involving a similar state law in California.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

CFPB Gives Failing Marks to Student Lender

  • The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) reached an agreement with Student Financial Aid Services, Inc., (SFAS) to resolve claims that the company violated the Consumer Financial Protection Act, the Telemarketing Sales Rule, and the Electronic Funds Act through its paid subscription services.
  • SFAS, which operated the website FAFSA.com, was alleged to have used deceptive tactics to enroll and automatically bill consumers for online or over-the-phone assistance for filling out the federal government's Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA). SFAS allegedly charged a recurring annual fee, with a negative option for termination, for up to four years.
  • The consent order requires SFAS to pay $5.2 million to the CFPB for redress to consumers who were charged for unauthorized, recurring service fees, and to cease all recurring or automatic charges. The order also requires SFAS to pay a civil penalty of $1—this nominal amount is to ensure that the company's remaining funds are focused on repaying harmed consumers while preserving victims' eligibility for additional relief from the CFPB Civil Penalty Fund in the future. In addition to the order, SFAS agreed to transfer the website FAFSA.com to the U.S. Department of Education, which uses FAFSA.ed.gov.

CFPB Hits the Brakes on the "Equity Accelerator"

  • The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) took action against two companies for allegedly deceiving consumers by marketing a mortgage payment system that promised consumers savings on interest over time through biweekly payments made automatically from consumers' bank accounts.
  • Paymap Inc., a payment processor and wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Union, together with LoanCare LLC, a mortgage servicer, marketed an "Equity Accelerator" product to LoanCare's customers. The companies claimed that through biweekly payments, "the average customer will achieve over $33,000 in interest savings." The CFPB alleged, however, that few customers achieved that level of savings, and that even though Paymap withdrew funds from consumers' accounts every two weeks, it would still only make payments on consumers' mortgages as per their original monthly schedule. As such, any savings came not from more frequent payments, but from the additional principal paid each year.
  • According to the orders, Paymap will return $33.4 million to consumers and pay a $5 million civil penalty to the CFPB. For its part in providing customers, LoanCare LCC will pay a $100,000 civil penalty. Both companies are prohibited from advertising the benefits of mortgage payment programs without credible evidence to support their claims, and must disclose when the projected savings comes only from increased annual payment amounts. In addition, both companies must keep records on their compliance with the CFPB orders, and report regularly to the CFPB for a period of five years.

DC Circuit Clarifies Who Has Standing to Sue the CFPB

  • The Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit overturned a lower court opinion that held that State National Bank of Big Spring did not have standing to challenge the constitutionality of certain aspects of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) since the Texas bank had not been subject to a CFPB enforcement action.
  • Instead, the DC Circuit indicated that an entity can challenge an agency when it can show that the entity operates in a sector the agency regulates. As stated by the court, "[i]t would make little sense to force a regulated entity to violate a law (and thereby trigger an enforcement action against it) simply so that the regulated entity can challenge the constitutionality of the regulating agency."
  • Since the bank does business in the remittance market, and the CFPB has authority to regulate that sector, the DC Circuit ruled that the bank had standing to challenge the CFPB on at least two constitutional issues. The DC Circuit did not address the substance of the bank's challenge, namely that it was unconstitutional for the CFPB to operate under a single director instead of a commission similar to that of the Federal Trade Commission or the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that the recess appointment of CFPB Director Cordray was unconstitutional.

Consumer Protection

Washington AG Makes Crowdfunder Pay

  • Washington AG Bob Ferguson has successfully sued Altius Management LLC and its President for violations of the state Unfair Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act in connection with a failed crowdfunding project.
  • According to the complaint, Altius created, marketed, and accepted funding for a Kickstarter campaign to create a custom set of playing cards. Altius secured over $25,000 in funding from 810 backers, and thus, as per the terms and conditions of the Kickstarter platform, was legally bound to fulfill backer rewards (i.e., provide each backer with the indicated custom set of playing cards). AG Ferguson brought the law suit when, after more than two years, Altius failed to deliver the product, and had not issued any refunds.
  • The default judgment requires Altius to pay $668 in restitution and $23,183 for attorneys' fees and costs. The court held that each unrewarded or unrefunded contributor formed a separate violation of state law and also issued civil penalties totaling $31,000: Because there were 31 backers in Washington, the court issued 31 separate civil penalties of $1,000 each.

Wireless Provider Disputes "Apparent" Liability

  • AT&T Mobility LLC responded to a decision made last month by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to fine the wireless provider $100 million for throttling broadband speeds after users reached a certain data usage threshold for the month, even though such data plans were sold as "unlimited."
  • The FCC issued a Notice of Apparent Liability (NAL) claiming that AT&T violated the Open Internet Transparency Rule when it failed to advise users that their broadband access would be slowed or throttled if they exceeded a monthly limit of data usage. The FCC's investigation claimed that some users had their speeds slowed by more than 80 percent, even though they had paid for unlimited data plans, rendering their Internet access almost useless during the period of throttling. The FCC alleged that heavy users faced, on average, 12 days per month of throttling.
  • In its Response to the NAL, AT&T argued that the FCC's forfeiture penalty of $100 million was seemingly "plucked out of thin air, and the injunctive sanctions it proposes are beyond the Commission's authority." In addition, AT&T argued that it was not given proper notice that its practices would be in violation of the Transparency Rule, and that the FCC has ignored other wireless providers who have used similar practices. Finally, AT&T indicated that the term "unlimited" was not deceptive, and must be viewed in the context of the agreement, which applied to data quantity, not speed. Since the NAL, AT&T has switched to a policy that only reduces heavy users' speeds during periods of peak network congestion.


Food Company Digests SEC Fine for Alleged Bribes in China

  • The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) settled its allegations against Mead Johnson Nutrition Company, resolving claims that Mead violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act through the conduct of its Chinese subsidiary and third-party distributors.
  • The SEC alleged that Mead's Chinese subsidiary made over $2 million in improper payments, and provided other incentives to professionals at government-owned hospitals in China from 2008 to 2013, in order to entice the hospitals to use the company's infant food and formula products. Although the payments were made through third-party distributors, the SEC was able to trace them back to Mead because the distributors received discounts to compensate them for their expenses.
  • As indicated in the SEC Order, Mead presented an Offer of Settlement in which it agreed to pay $9 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, and $3 million as a penalty. It did not admit wrongdoing. The Department of Justice closed its investigation accordingly.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions