United States: The World In US Courts - Summer 2015 - When Can Personal Jurisdiction Over A Non-US Company Be Based On Actions Taken By Its US Subsidiary?

Last Updated: July 30 2015
Article by   Orrick

Plaintiffs routinely try to impute the activities of US subsidiary companies to their non-US parents in an effort to obtain jurisdiction over the parents in American courts. While there is broad agreement as to the general principles of law to be applied in addressing the question of parental responsibility, judicial rulings are very fact-specific, and not at all consistent with one another. Notably, some decisions turn on a review of the facts giving rise to the claim, while in others the courts focus on the general operation of the parent-subsidiary relationship at issue. In both cases, a familiarity with the rules that courts are likely to apply can allow for advance planning, and help minimize the chances that a court will find that jurisdiction exists.

This special issue of The World in US Courts is devoted exclusively to the parent-subsidiary relationship, and discusses the circumstances under which US courts will and will not impute a subsidiary's actions to its parent for purposes of determining whether the parent must remain in a case.1 An Executive Summary appears below, describing the principal points that we draw from the cases. A more detailed summary with discussions of specific cases follows for those readers wishing to study the issue in further detail and to consider its application in the context of their situations.

Executive Summary

Personal jurisdiction describes the power of a US court (state or federal) to require a party to participate in a judicial proceeding, and to issue enforceable orders applicable to that party. Even if a court has jurisdiction to hear a particular dispute, it may only act against parties over which it has personal jurisdiction. The result is that some parties may win dismissal of a claim on personal jurisdiction grounds even if the case proceeds against other defendants.

The Due Process Clause of the US Constitution imposes requirements as to the minimum contacts that a defendant must have with a forum before personal jurisdiction may be asserted. Many plaintiffs seek to evade these requirements in the case of suits against a non-US company by arguing that the conduct of the company's US subsidiaries should be imputed to the parent for purposes of determining whether the parent had adequate contacts with the state where the litigation has been filed to support the assertion of personal jurisdiction.

US courts consider two types of personal jurisdiction, and the role of the parent-subsidiary relationship is different in each. First, "general personal jurisdiction" allows a court to hear any claim against a particular defendant no matter whether the claim relates to the defendant's contacts with the forum State where the court sits. "Specific personal jurisdiction," meanwhile, is narrower, only allowing a court to hear claims arising out of the defendant's contacts with the forum. The difference can have dramatic practical consequences: Subject to the assertion of additional defenses that would have to be litigated, a defendant that is sued in a State where it is subject to general personal jurisdiction may be required to answer for its conduct anywhere in the US or even the world.

General personal jurisdiction is broad in scope but difficult to obtain. The 2014 decision of the US Supreme Court in Daimler AG v. Bauman held that general personal jurisdiction could only be asserted over a corporation in a State where the corporation could be said to be "at home." The Supreme Court described a corporation as being "at home" in a State where is incorporated or has its principal place of business. For non-US corporations, there may be no US State where that is true. The Daimler case speculated that there may be an "exceptional" case where an alternative basis for general jurisdiction might be found, but courts have been reluctant to apply this exception broadly, choosing instead to conclude in the vast majority of cases that the State of incorporation/principal place of business test is dispositive.

Plaintiffs used two theories to try to assert general personal jurisdiction against a non-US company based on the activities of its US subsidiaries. First, they have argued that, under the facts of specific cases, the subsidiary's corporate form should be disregarded and the parent and the subsidiary should be deemed to be one entity—"alter egos" of one another. The Daimler case reduced the significance of this argument by noting that, even if the subsidiary were found to be part of the parent, general personal jurisdiction would still attach only if the combined company were incorporated, or had its principal place of business in, the US State where litigation was brought. Regardless, efforts to "pierce the corporate veil" are often attempted but are rarely successful. Corporations largely exist in order to shield their owners from the corporation's own actions, and courts will generally respect the corporate form if the subsidiary appears not to be a sham. Factors often cited by courts in refusing to pierce the corporate veil are whether the subsidiary is adequately capitalized, appears to make certain decisions on its own (even though there may be overlap in the management and boards between a subsidiary and its parent), and corporate formalities are observed. Notably, this risk can be minimized by careful advance planning.

Plaintiffs also try to impute the conduct of a subsidiary to its parent on a theory that the subsidiary is merely an "agent" of the parent. The Daimler opinion rejected two specific agency arguments and cast doubt on the viability of this theory as a general matter, and it appears unlikely that, at least as to general personal jurisdiction, agency claims will be successful in the future.

The parent-subsidiary relationship plays a different role in analyzing whether specific personal jurisdiction exists, because the focus is on specific conduct. Under the Due Process Clause, specific jurisdiction exists where (i) a defendant has itself "purposefully availed" itself of the privilege of doing business in a forum State, of a magnitude and type that it could reasonably anticipate being required to defend itself in the State's courts, (ii) the claims at issue arose out of those contacts, and not actions unrelated to the forum, and (iii) the assertion of jurisdiction would be consistent with "fundamental fairness and substantial justice."

Defendants often litigate whether the Due Process requirements for the assertion of specific personal jurisdiction have been satisfied. For present purposes, the question is whether a plaintiff may refer to actions taken by a non-US parent's US subsidiary in seeking to satisfy the test. The same two theories—that the parent and the subsidiary are alter egos of one another, and that the subsidiary has acted as the parent's agent—are used by plaintiffs in the context of specific personal jurisdiction, but the relevance of the parent-subsidiary relationship is different.

The showing necessary to pierce the corporate veil in the context of special jurisdiction is the same as it is with respect to general jurisdiction—meaning, that it is just as difficult. If successful, however, a plaintiff could utilize the US company's contacts with the forum State in order to argue that the non-US parent had "purposefully availed" itself of the privilege of doing business in a State, that the claim arose from the subsidiary's conduct, and that asserting jurisdiction was fair. Under the facts of a given case, this showing might not be difficult to satisfy. Again, the basis for such an argument is one that largely depends on the manner in which a parent has conducted and maintained its relationship with its subsidiaries, and thoughtful advance planning can reduce risks considerably.

Arguments that a subsidiary is merely the agent of its parent are also more dangerous in the context of specific jurisdiction than in that of general jurisdiction. While the standards for showing that an agency relationship exists are the same, the focus of special jurisdiction on the specific acts that give rise to a claim makes those acts—and the role the parent may have played in them—more relevant. The skepticism expressed in Daimler about the viability of agency theories in the context of general jurisdiction simply does not exist with respect to special jurisdiction, and so agency remains a potentially dangerous theory for non-US defendants. Even so, thoughtful advance planning can minimize the risk that an agency relationship may be found in connection with any transaction.

To read this article in full, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions