United States: The CFPB & UDAAP: A "Know It When You See It" Standard? 2015 Mid-Year Update

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) exercise of its sweeping authority to prohibit unfair, deceptive, and abusive acts or practices (UDAAP)1 continues to command the attention of financial institutions and financial services companies regulated by the agency. As promised by CFPB Director Richard Cordray,2 the CFPB has defined UDAAP primarily through enforcement actions, along with a few agency-issued supervisory findings and guidance bulletins.

To assist regulated and potentially regulated entities in understanding how the CFPB will exercise its UDAAP authority, we issued our "Know It When You See It" Client Alert in June 2014 as well as an updated Client Alert in January 2015. Those Alerts included a chart listing the specific acts and practices that the CFPB has alleged and/or identified as unfair, deceptive, and/or abusive from its inception to the end of 2014 based on the following sources:

  • CFPB Consent Orders based in whole or in part on alleged UDAAP violations;
  • Agency enforcement actions filed in federal court;
  • Specific prohibited practices cited in the CFPB's Examination Manual, derived in part from substantive statutes and regulations and previous FTC guidance; and
  • Guidance in agency-issued bulletins and similar informal statements that reflect the CFPB's UDAAP priorities.

Given the critical need to keep up with the CFPB's ever-expanding interpretation of the scope of UDAAP, we have updated our previous "Know It When You See It" chart (attached) through the middle of 2015.3

As we've explained in the previous Alerts, neither the allegations in enforcement actions nor recitations in consent orders are binding against any party other than the respondent or defendant in the case or proceeding. Thus far, there has been only one case in which a court has ruled on the merits in finding a covered person violated UDAAP.4 The CFPB's informal bulletins or statements ordinarily are not binding legal precedent. Nevertheless, the CFPB's activities provide guideposts for regulated entities seeking to conform to industry standards and mitigate risks of being charged with UDAAP in a proceeding brought by the CFPB.

CFPB UDAAP – Regulation by Enforcement

A summary analysis of the CFPB's public UDAAP pronouncements since we issued our previous "Know It When You See It" Alert in January 2015 is provided below, along with observations about lessons learned from these actions and other CFPB activities to date.

Unfair Acts and Practices

  • Credit Cards. The CFPB continued to focus on add-on products, alleging billing consumers for credit monitoring services when the product vendors knew they had not received written consent and therefore could not provide all product benefits was an "unfair" practice.
  • Credit Products. Enrolling customers in a credit product without their consent, not allowing customers to select a different payment allocation method, and failing to accept or timely post payments were identified by the CFPB as "unfair."
  • Mortgage Servicing. Loan modification practices remained at the top of the priority list, with the CFPB alleging failure to honor loan modifications after servicing transfers was an "unfair" practice.
  • Debt Collection. Debt collection practices were at issue in a majority of the Consent Orders issued since January 2015, including several Orders in cases involving creditors collecting their own debt. The acts identified as "unfair" included placing debt collection calls to consumers at their place of work after being told such calls were prohibited by the employer and/or contacting employers without consent, debiting consumers' bank accounts without consent or using threats to obtain consent, broadcasting threatening messages to consumers on behalf of debt collectors, selling accounts the holder knew or should have known were unenforceable or had insufficient information to support the debt owed, and submitting alleged robo-signed declarations in collection litigation.

    The CFPB again took the view that actions expressly authorized by contract could be "unfair," focusing on a contractual provision allowing the creditor to contact a servicemembers' commanding officer that was allegedly buried in the credit agreement.
  • Refund Anticipation Loans (RALs). In the first enforcement action involving RALs, the CFPB alleged the lender's practice of reissuing high-cost RALs even after receiving the consumer's tax refund without disclosing to the consumer that the tax refund had been received was an "unfair" practice.
  • Wireless Carriers. The CFPB again asserted its view that wireless carriers are "covered persons" subject to its enforcement jurisdiction, filing another enforcement action alleging a wireless carrier was allowing third-party merchants to place unauthorized charges on customers' phone bills. Specifically, the CFPB alleged that allowing third-party access to customers and billing systems without sufficient compliance controls, failing to resolve customer disputes about unauthorized charges, and failing to take steps to prevent unauthorized charges despite warnings from customers, government agencies, and public interest groups are "unfair" acts and practices.

Deceptive Acts and Practices

  • Marketing of Add-On Products. We saw three more "add-on" products actions in the first half of 2015, bringing the total to 10 enforcement actions based on these products. Two of the matters involved credit card issuers and the other involved the vendors providing and marketing the products for issuers. The CFPB alleged misrepresenting the nature or extent of benefits and failing to inform consumers they likely would be ineligible for one or more benefits were "deceptive" practices.
  • Mortgage Servicing. Alleged misrepresentations regarding loan status, whether an initial payment was required to be considered for a loan modification, and the time to respond to short sale requests, that a payment method that required payment of a fee was the only available method to make a timely payment, as well as sending foreclosure notices to borrowers who were current on their loans all were said to be "deceptive" by the CFPB.
  • Debt Collection. Continuing its intense focus on debt collection activities, the CFPB alleged as "deceptive" misrepresentations that the debtor had committed a crime and that the debt collector had authority to collect the debt and/or to take legal action due to non-payment. The CFPB also alleged that affidavits in debtcollection proceedings in which the affiants did not have personal knowledge of the validity or ownership of debts were "deceptive."
  • False Impression of Affiliation. Several of the enforcement actions made public during the first half of 2015 included allegations of misrepresentations regarding affiliation. These included ads by mortgage loan originators implying the company was affiliated with federal government agencies or the product was sponsored or endorsed by those agencies, alleged misrepresentations by a company offering a mortgage payment product of an affiliation with the consumers' mortgage servicers or lenders, and advertising that a lender was the designated exclusive lender for a veterans' organization without revealing the lender had paid for the endorsement.

Abusive Acts and Practices

  • Servicemember Debt Collection. The CFPB alleged a creditor's threat to exercise its contractually authorized right to contact servicemembers' commanding officers and in some cases actually contacting the commanding officer constituted an "abusive" act, as did allegedly burying the contractual authorization for this practice in the lending contract without giving the servicemember an opportunity to bargain or an understanding of the anticipated frequency of contacts. The CFPB further identified as "abusive" misrepresentations that an unpaid debt could have negative consequences for servicemembers' careers and/or could result in an action brought under the Military Code. A servicemember lender that allegedly failed to adequately disclose fees before collecting them from the servicemembers' allotment accounts also found itself the target of "abusive" allegations.
  • Mortgage Servicing. The CFPB alleged an "abusive" claim based on a mortgage servicer's guarantee that consumers would save money if they enroll in a biweekly payment program even though servicer knew fees would exceed savings in the first several years and that many consumers would leave the program before obtaining any savings.
  • Credit Product. Deferred interest promotions were deemed "abusive" by the CFPB because the lender allegedly provided little information regarding how it would allocate payments among standard and deferred-interest balances and did not honor its representation to consumers that they could control payment allocation. As a result, consumers allegedly could not understand how payments were applied or allocated.
  • RALs. Alleged financial incentives to tax preparers to steer consumers to higher APR RALs originated by a sister company and failure to disclose these incentives or the relationship between the tax preparer and the RAL lender formed the basis of an "abusive" claim against the RAL lender.

CFPB UDAAP – What Have We Learned?

The CFPB's UDAAP-related activity in the first half of 2015 continued to build a much-needed roadmap for regulated entities:

  • The CFPB has continued to focus its UDAAP authority on its hot-button issues, including debt collection, addon products, mortgage servicing, student lending, and any lending targeted at servicemembers. The CFPB added RALs to the types of products and services it does not believe are in the best interests of consumers and therefore will be subject to agency scrutiny.
  • The CFPB continued to build on its use of UDAAP to bring wireless carriers within the scope of its jurisdiction by pursuing another enforcement action targeting alleged unauthorized thirdparty charges. It similarly relied on UDAAP to expand the scope of federal law by bringing UDAAP claims against creditors collecting their own debts even though federal debt collection law applies only to third-party debt collectors and even though its anticipated debt collection rules have not yet been issued. We also saw the CFPB "federalize" state common-law unconscionability analysis once again by alleging a contract term "buried" in a lending agreement was an "unfair" and "abusive" practice.
  • The CFPB has begun using the aider and abettor liability authorized by Dodd-Frank. Aiders and abettors are those who "knowingly or recklessly provide substantial assistance" to a Covered Person or Service Provider committing an unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice.5 The CFPB relied on this provision to impose responsibility on creditors who sell debt for the acts of the debt purchasers. It similarly relied on this authority to reach payment processors and a telephone broadcast company the CFPB alleged were facilitating "unfair" and "deceptive" debt collection practices. The CFPB requested comment on which types of entities provide "substantial assistance" to debt collectors in its Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, but it has begun pursuing claims based on this provision without waiting to issue these rules.
  • For the most part, the CFPB continued to reserve "abusive" claims for products aimed at customers it considers vulnerable. Some of the allegations supporting "abusive" claims overlapped with the allegations supporting "unfair" or "deceptive" claims, and some were stand-alone allegations not repeated in support of other claims. The "abusive" claims shared an element of alleged surprise or inability of consumers to understand credit features or contractual rights due to the Covered Person's alleged inadequate disclosures.
  • Certain of the Consent Orders contained detailed injunctive relief provisions, which provide insight into the CFPB's views on appropriate conduct. These lists of requirements appear to be as close as the CFPB will come to issuing rules advising regulated entities how to avoid UDAAP enforcement for add-on and other types of products and practices.
  • The CFPB has continued to team with other state and federal government actors in bringing UDAAP enforcement actions. Since January, the OCC, 47 state attorneys general, the Navajo Nation, and the FTC have joined the CFPB in enforcement actions. The CFPB continues to put teeth into its broad informationsharing agreements with state and federal agencies, meaning regulated entities should be prepared for multiagency scrutiny.

To continue reading, please click here.


1 12 U.S.C. §§ 5531, 5536.

2 See, e.g., Kate Davidson, "Trying to Stay Above Politics: A Conversation with Richard Cordray," The American Banker (Mar. 23, 2012).

3 New entries in the chart, representing CFPB activities in the first half of 2015, are highlighted in blue.

4 CFPB v. Chance Gordon et al., CV 12-6147 RSWL

(MRWx), Minute Order (C.D. Cal. June 26, 2013).

5 12 U.S.C. § 5536(f)(3).

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Sarah Nicole Davis
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions