European Union: Recent EU Court And ECHR Case Law On Dawn Raids

Last Updated: July 24 2015
Article by Matthew Hall

Dawn raids remain a cornerstone of the European Commission (EC)'s and national regulators' investigatory practices, particularly in relation to cartels. Companies faced with a raid have to make rapid decisions concerning their internal investigations, external response and possible leniency applications.

At the same time, the law and practice governing the conduct of raids continues to become more complex. There have been several recent EU court and European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) cases in the area, which demonstrate the issues which can arise and which in-house and external counsel need to be cognizant of.

European Court of Justice; "no fishing"

On 18 June 2015, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) provided a reminder to the EC that it cannot engage in "fishing expeditions" during a dawn raid.

The dawn raid in question in this case1, at Deutsche Bahn (DB), concerned alleged breaches of a dominant position. During the raid, the officials found documents which seemed to indicate the possibility of further anti-competitive conduct, beyond the type originally suspected and identified in the inspection decision. The EC adopted a second inspection decision whilst the officials were still at DB's premises. Later, the EC adopted a third inspection decision, allowing it to return to DB's premises to seek further evidence relating to possible allegations of competition law infringements.

DB appealed the validity of the three decisions before the EU's lower court (the General Court (GC)) but lost. However, the ECJ disagreed, stating "... a search may be made only for those documents coming within the scope of the subject matter of the inspection". In other words, the EC cannot "go fishing". Since the EC had exceeded its powers during the first inspection and documents illegally obtained during it had been used as the basis for the adoption of the second and third inspection decisions, those latter two decisions should be annulled.

The ECJ did recognise previous case law which has held that if the EC during a raid "[happens] to obtain" evidence which appears to point to another possible infringement then it is not required to turn a blind eye to it. However, that is not what happened in this case. Instead, immediately before the first inspection took place, the officials were specifically informed as to the contents of another potential antitrust issue concerning DB. Advocate General Wahl took the view that the only reason for this was so that the staff could "keep their eyes peeled" for evidence relating to that issue. The ECJ held that this breached DB's rights of defense.

The EC will need to be careful in the future but presumably it could have forestalled any issue in this situation by adopting two separate decisions at the outset and then carrying out both inspections at the same time. The case emphasizes the need for compliance programs to train staff and lawyers on issues of relevance and scope of the EC's inspection decisions. The EC must be kept within the bounds of the decision, although the borders of this can be difficult to determine and uphold during the heat of an inspection.

"No fishing" but EC still has wide powers

On 25 June 2014, the ECJ had handed down judgment on another case principally concerning "fishing"2. The Nexans case confirms that, provided it is not "fishing", the EC has wide powers and the inspection decision must be examined carefully to determine the extent of these powers. The Deutsche Bahn case, where Nexans was referred to with approval, concerned by contrast documents which fell outside the description in the inspection decision.

The ECJ confirmed that, when undertaking a dawn raid, the EC is obliged to indicate as precisely as possible the evidence sought and the matters to which the investigation relates. However, it is not required to define precisely the relevant market, to set out the exact legal nature of the presumed infringements or to indicate the period during which those infringements were committed.

Since dawn raids take place at the beginning of an investigation, the EC lacks precise information allowing it to make a specific legal assessment of the potential infringement. It must first verify its suspicions and the scope of the incidents which have taken place. The aim of the inspection is to gather evidence relating to a suspected infringement.

The issue before the ECJ was the seizure of documents relating to conduct which took place entirely outside the EU. The ECJ found this to be permissible in order to detect conduct that could have an effect on competition within the EU. The inspection decision referred to potentially anti-competitive agreements which "probably have a global reach", which was held not to be insufficiently precise or overly broad. This shows the broad discretion that the EC has in raids and also the need to be careful when challenging the scope of an inspection decision, since this can put a company at risk of a fine for obstruction.

Previously, before the GC, Nexans (together with another company, Prysmian) had however won on the issue of limiting the EC's right to "go fishing"3. Unlike the DB case, the issue was not documents illegally seized at the raid, but the more basic issue of when the EC is entitled to carry out a raid at all.

The GC held that the EC must have reasonable grounds to justify a dawn raid (i.e. reasonable grounds for suspecting an infringement of the EU competition rules). The decision authorizing the inspection can therefore only validly refer to sectors of activity in relation to which the EC has such grounds.

This GC judgment is a good check on the EC's power. If it did not need reasonable grounds to justify a dawn raid in particular product areas, the EC would be able to carry out an inspection (on the basis of reasonable grounds for suspicion in any sector) which could in practice cover all of the activities of a company.

European Court of Justice; do not obstruct

Case law has also recently emphasized the dangers of obstruction. On 26 November 2014, the GC upheld a EUR2.5 million fine imposed by the EC for obstruction of a dawn raid4. The case again shows the importance of properly training staff, in particular IT staff, in advance so they know what to do if a dawn raid happens.

The case concerned Czech companies Energetický a průmyslový holding (EPH) and its subsidiary EP Investment Advisors (EPIA), which had been fined in 2012 for failing to block an email account and diverting incoming emails during a dawn raid in 2009. The GC confirmed that the EC was right to consider both of these incidents serious breaches of EPH and EPIA's obligation to cooperate with the EC during the raid. The GC held that the incidents constituted an obstruction in themselves; the EC did not need to show that any document was actually removed or manipulated. Further, the fact that the information might be available elsewhere in the company's IT system was not relevant.

The judgment sends a message to companies that any steps that undermine the integrity and effectiveness of EC dawn raids, including tampering with data stored electronically, are illegal and will be sanctioned. Also, companies must assist. The GC found that it is up to the company being raided to take the necessary measures to implement the inspectors' instructions and to ensure that the persons authorised to act on their behalf do not impede the implementation of those instructions.

The companies cannot say that they had not been warned since this is not the first time the EC has fined a company for obstructing a dawn raid. For example, in 2008, the EC fined German energy company E.ON EUR38 million for the breach of a seal during an inspection.

European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)

Human rights law has also been raised in the context of dawn raids and can be a key part of a defence strategy in suitable cases. In addition to the EU courts in Luxembourg applying this area of law to EC raids, the Strasbourg-based ECHR itself has considered cases involving national dawn raids.

On 2 April 2015, in the Vinci Construction case5, the ECHR held that there had been a violation of the right to a fair trial under the European Convention on Human Rights and a violation of the right to respect for private and family life, for the home and for correspondence. The case concerned inspections and seizures carried out by investigators from the French Department for Competition, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Prevention on the premises of two companies.

A central question in the case was the weighing of interests relating, on the one hand, to the legitimate search for evidence of offences under competition law, and, on the other, respect for home, private life and correspondence, and particularly for the confidentiality of lawyer-client exchanges. The Court considered that the safeguards provided by domestic law had not been applied in a practical and effective manner, particularly since it was known that the documents seized contained lawyer-client correspondence, which was subject to increased protection.

The parties could contest seizure of this correspondence before a judge but he had not conducted a "tangible examination" of the documents. The judge should have examined in detail the documents in question, considered the proportionality of their seizure and ordered their return where appropriate.

The ECHR handed down a judgment in another dawn raid case on 2 October 20146. The case concerned an inspection carried out at the premises of Czech Republic company Delta Pekárny. The company was fined for refusing to allow an in-depth examination of its data at the raid but challenged that decision, arguing that it was contrary to the ECHR (right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence) for the Czech Competition Authority to carry out an inspection without having received prior authorisation from a court. The ECHR agreed, holding that if prior court control of dawn raids does not exist (which it does not in the Czech Republic) then an effective ex post facto control must exist. However, the ex post judicial review which was available did not offer the company sufficient guarantees against arbitrariness.

Comment

The basic advice in relation to a dawn raid is usually "cooperate". This is generally sensible since the consequences of obstruction can be serious. However, what is meant by "cooperate" may not be clear to all staff at the raided company and it is crucial for suitable and comprehensive procedures, including training, to be in place. Even in non-extreme cases fines are likely to be imposed for obstruction and the courts will uphold these fines.

At the same time, case law provides defences on procedural and human rights grounds to dawn raids. Regulators read the cases too and are increasingly taking care not to make mistakes, but the scope for identifying problems with raid authorisations or the procedure itself remains great. These issues need to form part of a defence strategy and companies should make sure that these are taken advantage of as relevant.

Originally published in "Hot Topics" by American Bar Association, Section of International Law, International Antitrust Law Committee.

Footnotes

1. Case C 583/13 P, Deutsche Bahn AG and others v European Commission

2. Case C-37/13 P, Nexans SA and Nexans France SAS v European Commission

3. Case T-135/09, Nexans France SAS and Nexans SA v European Commission and Case T-140/09, Prysmian SpA and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Energia Srl v European Commission

4. Case T-272/12, Energetický a průmyslový holding a.s. and EP Investment Advisors s.r.o. v European Commission

5. Vinci Construction and GMT genie civil and services v. France (applications no. 63629/10 and 60567/10)

6. DELTA PEKÁRNY a.s. v. the Czech Republic (application no. 97/11)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Emails

From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.