European Union: Valuing Derivatives In A Bank Bail-In

Under the EU's Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive ("BRRD")1, one of the key powers given to national resolution authorities is the ability to impose losses on, or "bail-in", certain financial liabilities of the failing bank in a resolution action, either by writing down the principal amount of the liability or converting it into equity. One of the main aims of a bail-in is to ensure that creditors and/or shareholders can be made to bear an appropriate proportion of the failing institution's losses, in order to minimise the need for the application of public funds (a "bail-out").

The BRRD provides that all liabilities of the bank in resolution can be bailed-in, unless they are contained on an express list of excluded liabilities, or are excluded from bail-in pursuant to the discretion of the relevant resolution authority, which can be exercised in exceptional circumstances. As a result, derivatives liabilities are eligible for bail-in, except to the extent that they meet the criteria for one of the express exclusions. In order to facilitate such a bail-in of a derivative liability, however, such transactions firstly need to be terminated and closed-out and valued for the purpose of Article 36 of the BRRD. This process raises significant issues for market participants, who will no doubt be keen to ensure that, in the event that their derivatives transactions are mandatorily terminated earlier than intended, their net exposure is valued in a way that is consistent with expectations resulting from their contractually negotiated trading documentation.

The European Banking Authority ("EBA") recently published draft regulatory technical standards (the "RTS")2 applicable to the valuation of derivatives following the application of the bail-in power to such contracts. The EBA's authority to release the publication stems from Article 49(5) of the BRRD, which requires it to set out (i) appropriate methodologies for valuing derivative transactions, (ii) principles for establishing the relevant point in time at which valuations should be established, and (iii) methodologies for comparing the destruction in value that might arise from close-out and bail-in, with the amount of losses that would be borne by derivatives in a bail-in. We consider the EBA's approach to each of these issues below.

Scope

There are general exclusions from the scope of bail-in under Article 44(2) of the BRRD, including (but not limited to) covered deposits, certain liabilities with a maturity of less than seven days and liabilities to employees, trade creditors or taxing authorities. Some of these exclusions will be relevant to derivatives as well as other financial instruments. In particular, it should be noted that secured liabilities are excluded to the extent that the value of the liability does not exceed the value of the collateral, as are liabilities of less than seven days' remaining maturity to payment and settlement systems. Accordingly, since over-the-counter derivatives of EU banks are increasingly likely to be subject to either (a) mandatory clearing (resulting in the mandatory application of stringent margin requirements) or (b) collateralisation requirements in respect of uncleared trades (in each case, under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation ("EMIR"3)), the universe of derivatives that are likely to be subject to bail-in is likely to become increasingly limited in the future.

Close-Out and Netting

As a first step in the bail-in process, the BRRD itself lays down the parameters for valuing derivatives liabilities. In particular, Article 49(2) of the BRRD provides that write-down and conversion powers apply only upon or after relevant derivatives have been closed-out. Accordingly, resolution authorities have the power to terminate and close-out any derivative contract (that is not excluded from application of the bail-in tool) for that purpose. In addition, Article 49(3) requires that, where derivative transactions are subject to a netting agreement, the liability arising from such transactions must be determined on a net basis, in accordance with the terms of the underlying netting agreement.

Valuation Methodology

Uncleared Transactions

Once the derivative liabilities in the relevant "netting set" have been closed-out, the principal guiding methodology of the RTS, in valuing the closed-out liability, is that of the "replacement cost" of the relevant derivatives. A derivative's value is intended to be determined by reference to the costs incurred by a non-defaulting party in replacing the terminated contract (having taken any posted or received collateral into account).

This methodology may therefore result in a different valuation from one derived from the methodology elected by the two counterparties in their contractual agreement, the latter being disregarded for the purpose of the Article 36 valuation.

Article 2 of the draft RTS sets out the following steps for closing-out and valuing trades that are not centrally cleared:

1. The resolution authority must notify the relevant counterparty that its derivative contract(s) is/are to be terminated, specifying the proposed date for close-out.

2. The resolution authority will also notify the relevant counterparty of a date by which the counterparty must provide (a) evidence of commercially reasonable replacement trades and (b) a summary of any replacement trades. For more illiquid trades where replacement quotes might be less forthcoming, a counterparty may find it difficult to present the required valuation evidence. There is also no guidance with respect to precisely what constitutes appropriate evidence in this regard.

So long as evidence of actual commercially reasonable replacement trades is provided within the requisite time period, the applicable valuer (an independent valuation agent appointed in accordance with Article 36 of the BRRD or, where this is not possible, the resolution authority) will determine the early termination amount at the prices of those replacement trades.

However, in circumstances where the valuer concludes that the replacement trades were not concluded on commercially reasonable terms, or where the counterparty fails to provide sufficient or acceptable evidence by the deadline provided, the valuer will determine the close-out amount based on (1) mid-market end-of-day prices on the specified close-out date or (if that is not commercially reasonable) the time at which a price is available in the market for the underlying asset, (2) the mid-to-bid or mid-to-offer spread (depending on the direction of the netted risk position) in order to estimate loss or cost incurred as a result of close-out in liquidating, obtaining or re-establishing a hedge or related trading position, and (3) adjustments to (2) above in order to reflect the size of the exposure and credit-worthiness of the counterparty.

For this purpose, the valuer may take into account valuations generated on its own systems, data extracted from the institution under resolution (such as internal models and valuations) and third-party market and price information, as well as any other relevant data.

In order to provide certainty for the resolution authority in relation to the valuation, the BRRD provides for no automatic right of challenge or appeal for a creditor. However, it is a fundamental principle of the BRRD, contained in Article 73, that no creditor should be worse off in the bail-in action than it would have been in a conventional insolvency action. In order to give effect to that principle, Article 74 provides for a second independent valuation to be performed as soon as possible after the bail-in action has been effected. The purpose of this valuation is to assess whether shareholders or creditors would have fared better in an insolvency proceeding and, if so, by how much, so that the resolution authority can assess how much compensation would be payable to the relevant shareholder or creditor in order to reflect the "no creditor worse off" principle.

Cleared Transactions

For derivatives trades that are centrally cleared, the resolution authority will notify the central clearing counterparty ("CCP") that it wishes to terminate the applicable transactions, and close-out shall take place either immediately or at a later close-out date specified in the notification. In these circumstances, the valuer must establish the value of liabilities which arise from derivatives contained in groups of transactions covered by the same netting agreement ("netting sets") entered into between the institution under resolution (in its capacity as a clearing member) and the CCP. The RTS suggest that, in this case, the CCP will assume responsibility for determining the early termination amount in accordance with its standard default procedures. CCPs are required (under EMIR) to have default procedures in place which will typically include, as a first step, compulsory efforts to transfer or "port" the cleared trades to another clearing member and, failing that, an attempt by the CCP to auction off the defaulted trades to non-defaulting clearing members. The auction price will represent a cost or gain for the CCP and should therefore adequately reflect such transaction's replacement cost. Following this procedure, the CCP will then have to report the early termination amount applicable to each affected netting set and provide the resolution authority with the default management steps undertaken to liquidate or re-hedge the positions of the defaulted clearing member.

In most cases, the defaulting clearing member is highly unlikely to generate losses in excess of posted collateral. As such, the bailing-in of cleared derivatives is itself generally unlikely to occur in normal market conditions because of the express bail-in exclusion for secured liabilities.

Point in Time for Establishing Derivatives Liabilities

The value of derivative liabilities shall be determined by the applicable valuer at the following points in time:

1. where the valuer determines an early termination amount at the prices of replacement trades provided by the counterparty, the day and time of the replacement trades;

2. where the valuer determines an early termination amount in accordance with CCP default procedures, the day and time when the early termination amount is determined by the CCP; or

3. in all other cases, the close-out date or, if that is not commercially reasonable, the date and time when a price for the underlying asset is available in the market.

Destruction in Value

As an additional step in the valuation process, the BRRD requires that resolution authorities should also make efforts to avoid any unnecessary destruction in value in relation to the relevant derivatives transaction.

Therefore, Article 44(3)(d) of BRRD provides that one ground on which a resolution authority is permitted to exclude a liability from bail-in is where the bail-in of that liability would cause a destruction in value resulting in the losses borne by other creditors being higher than if that liability were not bailed-in. For this purpose, Article 49(5) of BRRD directs the EBA to develop RTS, specifying appropriate methodologies for comparing the destruction in value that would arise from the close-out and bail-in of derivatives liabilities with the amount of losses that would be borne by the bailed-in derivatives liabilities. Article 8 of the RTS therefore provides an additional safeguard, by requiring that resolution authorities must (prior to making a decision that results in close-out of the applicable transaction(s)) make a comparison between (a) the amount of losses that would be borne by derivatives contracts in a bail-in scenario and (b) the destruction in value based on an assessment of the costs, expenses or other impairment of value that is expected to be incurred as a result of the close-out of the derivatives contracts. Elements to be considered as part of the possible destruction in value include (i) the risk of an increased counterparty close-out claim arising from re-hedging costs, (ii) the cost expected to be incurred by the bank in resolution in re-establishing hedges or maintaining an acceptable risk profile, (iii) any reduction to franchise value arising from close-out and any impact to funding costs or income levels, and (iv) any precautionary buffer against possible adverse implications from close-out, such as errors and disputes in respect of transactions or collateral exchange.

Implementation

ESMA has invited market participants to provide comments on the draft RTS by 13 August 2015. The draft RTS are required to be submitted to the European Commission by 3 January 2016.

Footnotes

 1 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32014L0059

2 http://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/1073039/EBA-CP-201-10+CP+on+RTS+on+derivatives+valuation.pdf.

3 Regulation (EU) No. 648/2012.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Peter Green
Jeremy C. Jennings-Mares
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions