Worldwide: Antimonopoly Regulation Of Tenders In CIS

Last Updated: July 23 2015
Article by Marat Mouradov

The sale of goods and services through tenders has become normal practice for many companies operating in CIS markets. The establishment and maintenance of transparent and honest conditions for bidding in tenders is one of the fundamental principles for developing competition on relevant markets. However, most CIS countries lack detailed antimonopoly regulation of tenders. This brochure provides more details on competition law and tenders' regulation.

The articles in this brochure have been prepared by DENTONS offices in various CIS countries, as well as our partner K&P Law Firm LLC (Armenia).

The brochure provides information on the following jurisdictions:

  • Russia
  • Kazakhstan
  • Ukraine
  • Belarus
  • Azerbaijan
  • Armenia
  • Uzbekistan


Types of "tender"

The word "tender," one that has entered the spoken language, means a call for bids (torgi) (in the form of an auction or competitive tender (konkurs), in which a company or an individual meeting the criteria set by a potential client and offering the best terms for performance of the contract which is the subject of the tender obtains the right to enter into / perform such contract.

Russian Federation law identifies several types of calls for bids:

  • Private, held in accordance with the requirements of the civil legislation.
  • Calls held by so-called "certain types of legal entities," which means state corporations and companies, natural monopolies, public-funded institutions, etc. Such calls for bids are governed by Federal Law No. 223-FZ on the Procurement of Goods, Works and Services by Certain Types of Legal Entities of July 18, 2011, which lists the criteria for the calls for bids to which it applies.
  • Calls held to satisfy state and municipal needs. They are regulated by Federal Law No. 44-FZ on the Contract System for Procurement of Goods, Works, and Services for State and Municipal Needs of April 5, 2013.

Antimonopoly regulation of calls for bids is a central issue in both the public and private sectors. Chapter 4 of Federal Law No. 135-FZ on the Protection of Competition of July 26, 2006 (the "Competition Law") determines the basic rules for antimonopoly regulation of calls for bids applicable to all types of calls mentioned above (and also contains special rules governing specific types of calls).

Antimonopoly requirements to the holding of calls for bids

Article 17 of the Competition Law establishes prohibitions on certain practices that may lead to the prevention, restriction or elimination of competition in a call for bids, namely:

  1. Coordinating activities of tenderers by the organizers of calls for bids, requests for quotations or requests for proposals (hereinafter "Calls") or by clients.
  2. Creating preferential terms of participation for one or more tenderers in the Calls, including via access to information.
  3. Violating the procedure for determining the winner or winners of the Calls.
  4. Participating in the Calls of the organizers or clients and/or employees of the organizers or employees of clients.

There is additional antimonopoly regulation for certain types of Calls: for example, contracts of authorities of the Russian Federation or its subjects, local government authorities and state extrabudgetary funds with financial organizations may be concluded only based on the results of public Calls.

In practice one of the most frequent violations of antimonopoly legislation with respect to Calls is collusion of tenderers, or of tenderers and the organizer, to achieve a specific outcome of the Calls. Such collusion is considered a cartel, an anti-competitive agreement among business entities (Article 11 of the Competition Law), strictly prohibited under Russian law.

Practices of tenderers

Generally tenderers enter into cartel agreements before the start of the Calls. There are several long-standing forms of such agreements:

  1. Several dishonest tenderers intentionally decrease ("beat down," "taranyat") the price at the Calls until it becomes unreasonable from the economic standpoint, thereby depriving a bona fide tenderer of economic interest in the Calls. A few seconds before the end of the Calls the last participant of the cartel, who until that point had not made a bid, offers a price that is slightly lower than the price offered by the bona fide company. When determining the winner it is discovered that the companies that "beat down" the price do not meet some of the mandatory criteria of the Call, for example, they do not have the required permits. In the end, the contract is concluded with the dishonest tenderer that submitted the tender in the final seconds. A well-known example of the use of such a scheme is the case of a number of construction companies belonging to brothers that used it to ensure that one of their companies won the Calls1. The case was considered by the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Russian Federation (FAS) on the basis of a complaint from a bona fide tenderer.
  2. Dishonest entities register to bid in the Call; however, only one company actually submits a bid (one for the entire Call or a different one for each specific lot). In this way the client is compelled to enter into the contract on the terms of a single bid. One of the most notable cases using such a scheme was the cartel of pharmaceutical companies investigated in 2010-2012. Seventeen entities participated in the cartel, and they were tenderers in a large number of Calls in which the colluders won in turns2. The case was investigated by the FAS on the instruction of the RF Government jointly with the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation.

An anti-competitive agreement does not have to be stable or permanent; it is possible for one tenderer to coerce others to withdraw from a specific Call through bribery3. There are also cases of threats and violence from a dishonest tenderer against a potential competitor.

Practices of the Call Organizer

In practice, call organizer, operator of an electronic tendering platform, tender or auction commission (Call Organizer") often engages in anti-competitive practices by agreement with tendering companies: the Call is held counting on the fact that a specific tenderer will win.

The following are possible practices of a Call Organizer that are recognized as violations of the antimonopoly legislation:

  1. The setting of unfair, unnecessary or discriminatory tendering criteria for participation or terms of the Calls. Such terms may include integration of unrelated lots into a single lot, setting the requirement to have documents or equipment unrelated to the subject of the contract, etc. For example, the Government of Stavropol Kray when holding a public competitive tender among automotive businesses set the evaluation criterion at 7 points for businesses owning their production and technical facilities, and 0 points for those leasing them. Such a criterion was deemed to be invalid (as ownership of facilities does not affect the quality of services provided) and discriminatory against small and medium businesses4. The case was considered under a complaint from the automotive businesses.
  2. The Call Organizer prevents participation in the Calls. For example, it does not publish information on the date and time of the Calls, does not provide the address of the electronic tendering platform, etc5.
  3. The Call Organizer violates the procedure for determining the winner: it accepts a tender that does not meet the established criteria, selects a tenderer who did not make the best offer, etc6.

When considering cases of antimonopoly law violations in Calls (and when rendering decisions) the FAS may use a wide range of evidence of an offense. This includes:

  • Witness testimony, minutes and recordings confirming the fact of a cartel agreement or another violation of antimonopoly law.
  • Characteristics of the tenderers (they show signs of being "shell companies," operate from a single email address, are registered in a single building, etc.).
  • Factual information concerning the holding of the Calls and the practices of the Call Organizer (for example, absence of data on the electronic tendering platform during the Calls, confirmed by a notarized screenshot).
  • Information on activities of the tenderers (for example, a tenderer not being actually able to carry out a contract at the time the tender was submitted).
  • Circumstantial conclusions (inferences). For example, the conclusion that absolute coordination by tenderers is not possible without prior collusion.

Appealing the actions of the Call Organizer

The FAS may find "anti-competitive" violations in Calls during its own audits of compliance with antimonopoly legislation (including on the instruction of the Russian Federation Government within the scope of its authority, or on the basis of information received on violations7) or during the consideration of complaints against the actions of the Call Organizers. Such complaints may be filed by tenderers, or by third parties whose rights and legitimate interests could be infringed by violation of the procedure for holding the Calls (the complaint procedure is set forth in Article 18.1 of the Competition Law).

The following are some of the most frequently encountered grounds for complaints regarding the practices of Call Organizers:

  • Unfair tendering criteria.
  • Unfair terms of the Calls, for example, combining unrelated subjects of a Call into a single lot.

Complaints must be filed with the FAS within ten days of tallying the result of the Call (or of publication of the Call results on the Internet, if such publication is required). The time period may vary depending on the result or the nature of the Call. Together with filing a Complaint, the results of the Call may be challenged in court.

The FAS is required to consider the complaint on the merits within seven business days of receiving the complaint. Once the complaint is received FAS is required to notify the Call Organizer that a complaint has been received and suspend the Calls until the complaint has been considered on the merits. The Call Organizer and the tenderers may send the antimonopoly authority an objection or an addendum to the complaint and participate in the consideration of the complaint. The Call Organizer also cannot enter into a contract with a tenderer until FAS renders a decision on the complaint, otherwise the contract will be considered void.

The appellant may renounce its complaint (without the right to submit a complaint again). The decision or order of the FAS commission may be appealed in court within three months of the date of the decision or issuance of the order.

If, during consideration of a complaint, some of the arguments set out in the complaint are confirmed while some are not, the complaint is declared valid8. If the arguments set out in the complaint are not confirmed, but the FAS commission has determined that there were other violations that were not the subject of a complaint, the Complaint is deemed invalid, but the discovered violation is stated in the decision and, if necessary, the appropriate order is issued9.

Consequences of finding violations of antimonopoly law

FAS orders to eliminate antimonopoly law violations may include requirements to extend the Call once the criteria for participation and terms have been changed, or other violations have been eliminated, orders to strictly supervise the tendering procedure (including documenting all practices of a participant), etc.

Violation of the requirements of antimonopoly legislation is a ground for a court to invalidate the Call and transactions concluded on the basis of the Call, including further to a claim of the antimonopoly authority.

It is possible to impose administrative liability on violators, primarily under Article 14.32 (Conclusion of an anti-competitive agreement, taking anti-competitive coordinated actions, coordination of economic activity) of the Russian Federation Code of Administrative Offenses No. 195-FZ dated December 30, 2001.

Finally, if the anti-competitive practices have resulted in major (more than 10,000,000 rubles, or approx. US$17,185) damage to individuals, organizations or to the state, or have resulted in the deriving of a large amount of revenue (more than 50,000,000 rubles or approx. US$859,550), criminal prosecution of individual violators is possible. In this case primarily Article 178 (Prevention, restriction or elimination of competition) of the Russian Federation Criminal Code No. 63-FZ dated June 13, 1996 will apply. Penalties under the main component of this article reach a fine of 500,000 rubles (approx. US$8,595) or amount equal to the income of two years, forced labor or imprisonment for up to three years with possible deprivation of the ability to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities. The presence of aggravating circumstances may result in up to seven years of imprisonment.

To read this Brochure in full, please click here.


1. Case No. 05-10-07/2011 (decision of the FAS department for Orenburg dated September 2, 2011)

2. Case No. 1 11/158-10 (decision of the FAS Commission dated July 6, 2011) and others. For example, case No. 1 11/194-11 (decision of the FAS Commission dated December 2, 2011): one tenderer gave another tenderer money not to participate in the Calls. The case was considered at the confession of the bribed tenderer.

4. Case No.67 (decision of the FAS department for Stavropol Kray dated July 20, 2011)

5. For example, case No.132-/2014 (decision of the FAS Russia department for Krasnodar dated November 6, 2014): the client did not publish information on the Calls on the electronic tendering platform. The case was considered at the complaint of a potential tenderer.

6. For example, case No. 60 (decision of the FAS Russia department for Novosibirsk dated December 18, 2013): the tender commission awarded the winning tenderer the maximum number of points according to a criterion which it did not in fact meet. The case was considered further to wan application of the acting prosecutor.

7. For example, further to an inquiry from senator Ruslan Gattarov, the FAS audited an auction of the Ministry of Health to develop infrastructure for the Unified State Health Information System (FAS official website:

8. FAS Russia letter No. ATs /16109/14 dated April 23, 2014 on the Sending of Clarifications on the Adoption of Decisions by the Antimonopoly Authority based on the Results of Consideration of Complaints against Violation of the Procedure for Mandatory Callses in accordance with Russian Federation Legislation and the Procedure for Concluding Contracts according to the procedure of Article 18.1 of Federal Law No. 135-FZ on Protection of Competition dated July 26, 2006.

9. Ibid.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
25 Oct 2018, Other, New York, United States

Once again, Dentons is proud to bring together insurance industry leaders, lawyers and regulators for a full-day examination of the most current issues.

26 Oct 2018, Other, New York, United States

Selling your company may be the most important and complicated transaction of your life. To achieve an optimal outcome, you need to get educated.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions