United States: US Employment Litigation Round-Up for June 2015: A Review of Key Cases and New Laws Affecting Employers

Keywords: employer handbook policies, disability, wage and hour dispute, disparate-treatment

A Review of Key Cases and New Laws Affecting Employers

National Labor Relations Board Continues to Scrutinize Employer Handbook Policies

Decisions: In a pair of recent decisions, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) provided additional guidance concerning employer handbook policies. In Boch Imports, Inc., a split panel of the NLRB ruled that a car dealer violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by maintaining overly broad dress code, social media and confidentiality policies. The panel found NLRA violations based on the employer's 2010 policies, even though the employer had replaced all but the dress policy in 2013, with assistance from an NLRB regional office. Relying on NLRB precedent, the panel explained that an effective repudiation must be timely, unambiguous, specific in nature to the coercive conduct, adequately published to the employees involved and provide assurances to employees that in the future the employer will not interfere with the exercise of their rights under the NLRA. Additionally, there must be no proscribed conduct on the employer's part after the repudiation. The panel determined that Boch Imports did not meet these criteria because the offending dress code policy remained in the new handbook and the employer did not make assurances to employees that, in the future, it would not interfere with employees' NLRA rights.

In the second decision, Macy's, Inc., an NLRB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that: (i) Macy's maintained unlawful confidentiality policies because those policies could reasonably be construed as interfering with employees' rights to discuss their terms and conditions of employment with fellow employees, as well as their ability to notify a union of other employees who might be interested in participating in the union movement; (ii) Macy's violated the NLRA by requiring employees to notify company representatives prior to participating in a governmental investigation; and (iii) the savings clause in Macy's employee handbook was insufficient to cure any unlawful polices because it was written in a generic manner, rather than using language that was specific in nature to the coercive conduct and that expressly referenced the unlawful rules.

Impact: These decisions serve as an important reminder to employers to regularly review their employee policies—particularly those related to the use of confidential information and employees' participation in governmental investigations—to ensure that they comply with the most recent pronouncements from the NLRB and other relevant government agencies, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Further, to the extent employers revise their policies after an unfair labor charge has been initiated with the NLRB, they should work with counsel and the NLRB to ensure that those revisions constitute an effective repudiation that will relieve them of liability.

California Court of Appeal Holds that Boss-Induced Stress Is Not a "Disability"

Decision: In Higgins-Williams v. Sutter Medical Foundation, a California Court of Appeal ruled that the plaintiff's alleged disability—an inability to work under a particular supervisor because of anxiety and stress related to the supervisor's oversight of her job performance—was not a disability recognized under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). The plaintiff was granted a stress-related leave of absence due to alleged stress from dealing with her supervisor and the human resources department. When plaintiff returned to work, she received a negative performance evaluation from her supervisor and had several other altercations with her supervisor. Plaintiff was granted another leave of absence, despite having exhausted her statutory leave rights. After several months, her employer advised plaintiff that it would terminate her employment unless she provided information as to when she could return to work and whether additional leave, as an accommodation, would effectuate her return to work. Plaintiff did not supply the information and the employer terminated her employment. Plaintiff sued, alleging disability discrimination claims. The trial court granted the employer's motion for summary judgment on all claims.

The Court of Appeal affirmed, holding that plaintiff failed to satisfy the first prong of a disability-related claim: that she suffered from a FEHA-recognized mental disability. According to the court, plaintiff's inability to work under a particular supervisor did not constitute a disability under FEHA. The court also held that the employer had a legitimate reason for terminating plaintiff's employment and that the employee could not adequately show that the reason was pretextual.

Impact: This decision rejects employee disability discrimination claims when the sole basis for the discrimination claim is the stress of working for a particular supervisor. However, employers should proceed with extreme caution on any claim for mental disability to ensure that there is a clear record regarding the employee's claimed disability prior to terminating any employee for supervisor-related stress, and should engage in a documented interactive process with the employee.

California Court of Appeal Holds Forum/Choice-of-Law Clause Unenforceable in Wage-and-Hour Dispute

Decision: In Verdugo v. Alliantgroup, L.P., a trial court granted a motion to stay based on a clause in the plaintiff's employment agreement that designated Harris County, Texas, as the forum for disputes arising out of the employment and Texas law as governing all disputes. A California Court of Appeal reversed.

All of the employee's wage-and-hour claims were brought under the California Labor Code. Because the underlying claims were based on statutory rights that cannot be waived, the employer had the burden to show that enforcement of the forum selection clause would not be unreasonable or unfair. The employer did not demonstrate that forcing the employee to litigate her claims in Texas under Texas law would not diminish the employee's California statutory rights. 

Impact: Employers cannot assume that forum/choice-of-law clauses in their agreements with California employees will be enforceable. Because of the variances among the wage-and-hour laws of each state, employers are unlikely to meet the burden of establishing that an employee would not be prejudiced by enforcement of a forum/choice-of-law clause that takes an employee's dispute out of the jurisdiction where he/she works.

US Supreme Court Holds Employer's Actual Knowledge Not Required for Disparate-Treatment Claim Under Title VII

Decision: In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., the US Supreme Court held that an applicant raising a disparate-treatment claim under Title VII need not show that the employer had actual knowledge of the applicant's need for accommodation of a religious practice. Rather, the applicant need show only that the need for a religious accommodation was a motivating factor in the employer's decision. Mayer Brown's complete summary of the decision is available online.

Impact: The decision sets forth an unequivocal prohibition against making adverse employment decisions based on even the unconfirmed belief that an applicant's religious practice requires an accommodation.

Originally published on June 30, 2015

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2015. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions