United States: Time Runs Out On Omega

TTAB Dismisses Watchmaker's Opposition To Marks For Protective Clothing, Bags
Last Updated: June 30 2015
Article by Scott J. Slavick

At the end of April, the USPTO's (United States Patent and Trademark Office) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) issued what might on its face be an unexpected decision.

In Omega S.A. v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Opposition Nos. 91173785 and 91174067 (April 29, 2015) [not precedential], the board dismissed watchmaker Omega S.A.'s oppositions to Alliant Techsystems' application to register a stylized version of Omega and Omega Elite, both with the initial Greek letter Ω as opposed to the Roman capital O, for protective clothing and bags for technical gear.

The board found that Alliant's applied-for marks were not likely to cause confusion with the previously used marks Omega and the Greek letter Ω, for clothing, watches, timing equipment, and sports accessories, and the registered marks Omega and variations thereof for watches and timing equipment.

This comes as something of a surprise — especially because the board acknowledged that the mark at issue was famous for watches, noting that Omega S.A. had used its mark for over 100 years, could demonstrate significant sales volumes, had extensively advertised the Omega mark, had received widespread unsolicited media attention and had successfully associated its brand with major sports events and celebrities. Moreover, unsurprisingly, the board found that the applicant's stylized Omega mark was similar to the opposer's own, since both began with the Greek letter Ω. The board also felt that Alliant's applied for Omega Elite mark was more similar than not to Omega S.A.'s marks, because the word Elite was laudatory and descriptive and therefore deserving of less weight in the likelihood of confusion analysis.

In short, the first of the factors in the widely cited DuPont case that has historically been the framework for determining likelihood of confusion weighed in favor of the opposer. See In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973).

In its defense, however, Alliant submitted a number of third-party registrations for marks comprising or containing the word omega or the Greek letter Ω, as well as Internet printouts displaying use of such marks. Several of the third-party marks the board deemed particularly interesting; although the applicant provided no evidence as to how much any of these marks were actually used, the board felt confident that "the public may have been exposed to offers for sale of or advertisements for OMEGA-branded goods which are similar or at least related to Applicant's goods." The board felt that this evidence of third-party use, given its stated limitations, slightly favored Alliant.

The opposer did try to introduce evidence of its own use of Omega in connection with clothing, sports accessories, and other goods besides watches. It pointed to promotional items such as Omega-branded life preservers and starting guns. But there was no proof that these items qualified as goods in trade. And the board seemed unconvinced that the opposer's goods were related to the applicant's. It noted that starting guns were not weapons and therefore were unrelated to the applicant's tactical gear; likewise, Omega S.A.'s "timekeeping services," although sometimes provided for events that include guns — for example, for biathlons — those, too, were unrelated to the applicant's goods.

Neither did the board see evidence that the opposer sold these goods or made any use of Omega with them prior to the applicant's filing date. So this evidence did not establish "technical trademark use," nor any use prior to Alliant's filing dates.

Next, the board turned to the issue of whether the parties were likely to continue selling through the same sales channels and to the same classes of the purchasers. Alliant claimed that it offered its goods via catalog sales, targeting military, law enforcement, and other types of customers seeking tactical gear. Omega's branded watches, on the other hand, are sold through its own retail stores, as well as in authorized dealers and boutiques — at prices from $3,000 upward.

Interestingly, neither the opposed applications nor the pleaded registrations describe any limitations as to channels of trade or classes of consumers, but the board asserted that this lack of a limitation only meant that the parties' goods are presumed to travel in all normal channels to all prospective purchasers for the relevant goods.

On the strength of this assertion, the board held that even though some consumers of the applicant's tactical goods might purchase one of the opposer's high-end watches, that possibility in itself does not provide a basis for finding that the parties' likelihood of continuing to use their own specific channels of trade and marketing to their own classes of purchasers meant that these audiences of consumers would overlap.

As the board saw it, just because every consumer is a potential customer for Omega's watches, that does not necessarily mean that a purchaser of both parties' products would think they emanated from the same source. Otherwise, this factor would weigh in the opposer's favor in every Section 2(d) dispute. Instead, the board held that in view of the lack of evidence of a relationship between the opposer's and the applicant's goods, the lack of similarity in the parties' respective channels of trade, and the different classes of purchasers to whom each party marketed its products, these factors weighed heavily against a finding of likely confusion.

Finally, the board accepted the applicant's argument that its goods would be purchased with care because they are used to protect people's lives. The board felt that this factor slightly favored the applicant in countering a claim of likelihood of confusion. Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, and despite the fame of the opposer's mark, the board found confusion unlikely.

Omega v. Alliant Techsystems presented other claims that bear analysis. For instance, while its applications were pending, Alliant filed a motion to delete many of its identified goods from that application and consented to an entry of judgment against it as to trademarking those goods. The board granted the motion. However, the applicant's admitted non-use on some of the goods, the board observed, was not a ground for deeming its applications void ab initio in their entireties. To support its conclusion, the board noted that prior to its filing date, the applicant used its marks for pouches for tactical gear, which the board held were substantively the same as the bags for tactical gear and tactical equipment of the application, and for armor-bearing vests, which are protective clothing. Thus, the board dismissed the opposer's non-use and abandonment claims.

Omega S.A. also claimed in its opposition that Alliant had committed fraud on the USPTO when it filed its application, because it later admitted that it did not use its marks on some of the identified goods prior to filing its use-based applications. The watchmaker based this claim on the fact that the applicant delayed in correcting its applications until after Omega had opposed them, and said delay established the applicant's deceptive intent.

The TTAB denied this claim, primarily because there was no evidence, let alone the required clear and convincing evidence, that the applicant intended to deceive the USPTO when it filed its application. The fact that the applicant should have known it was not using its marks on some of the goods did not, according to the board, establish fraud. In its defense, Alliant admitted its error during discovery and then made its motions to amend. Even though the deletion occurred seven years after the mark was applied for, the Board felt that it did not constitute evidence of an intent to deceive the USPTO and dismissed Omega's claim of fraud.

Omega S.A.'s loss in this case raises provocative questions. First of these is whether the board's holding ignores existing case law that an applicant may not limit the identification of goods by means of extrinsic evidence of actual usage. Second is whether the board was right in dismissing the fact that the applicant took seven years to request deletion of the non-used goods as having no bearing on whether the applicant committed fraud on the PTO when it filed its application based on use. Seven years is a long time. Would Alliant ever have deleted those goods, had it not faced Omega's opposition?

A final question is whether this case does really rise and fall on the relatedness of the parties' goods — and whether it should. The concept of trademark dilution was supposed to do away with the relatedness-of-goods argument — for example, that anyone using the trademark Coca-Cola for any good could be guilty of dilution. Yet in Omega v. Alliant Techsystems, the board set such assumptions aside, and spent a great deal of time and effort discussing the differences between the parties' goods. Does this suggest some new feelings towards dilution? Is there some qualitative difference between Coca-Cola and an Omega watch that the TTAB fathoms but that escapes us? Or is this non-precedential decision just a one-off?

Time will tell. Pun intended.

Originally published on InsideCounsel.com.

This article is intended to provide information of general interest to the public and is not intended to offer legal advice about specific situations or problems. Brinks Gilson & Lione does not intend to create an attorney-client relationship by offering this information and review of the information shall not be deemed to create such a relationship. You should consult a lawyer if you have a legal matter requiring attention. For further information, please contact a Brinks Gilson & Lione lawyer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Scott J. Slavick
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions