United States: Obamacare Saved By Supreme Court

In a 6-3 decision credited with saving Obamacare, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the premium subsidies offered to qualifying enrollees of insurance plans offered on federal exchanges, which help more than 6 million Americans pay for their health plans under Obamacare, are legal. The Court declined to apply Chevron1 deference to an IRS regulation authorizing such subsidies, and instead took on the task of determining the correct reading of the statute for itself. In doing so, the Court made it virtually impossible for future administrations to issue any agency regulations that would take the federal subsidies away from people enrolled in health insurance through state or federal exchanges.

Many analysts were convinced that, were the Court to disallow the subsidies, the cost of individual plans would have skyrocketed and Obamacare would have collapsed. Chief Justice Roberts recognized this potential outcome in his majority opinion, writing "Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them." Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. was joined in the majority by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. As a result of the ruling, President Obama was able to announce that "the Affordable Care Act is here to stay," at a press conference Thursday morning. Shares of hospital company stocks surged after the ruling was announced.

Now that federal subsidies are conclusively available to individuals purchasing insurance through the federal exchange and state exchanges alike, those states that are struggling to manage their state-based exchanges may decide to hand over exchange operations to the federal government. Given the Washington Post's report that nearly half of the states running state-based exchanges are suffering from financial difficulties, there could potentially be a gradual transition to a single federal exchange.

Political pundits have also noted that the decision may spur a change in position by those states that have yet to opt into the Medicaid expansion afforded as an option under the ACA. While there is no direct connection between the Court's decision and the potential for expansion of Medicaid, the news that the health insurance subsidies have been decisively protected by the Court, as well as the extensive media coverage on the decision, could serve as motivation for politicians and citizens in hold-out states, such as Virginia, Florida and Texas, to more loudly demand access to the federal matching funds that come with Medicaid expansion.

Case Background

Under the ACA, individuals are exempt from the requirement to maintain health insurance coverage if the cost of buying insurance would exceed 8% of that individual's income. However, the ACA also establishes federal subsidies, in the form of tax credits issued by the IRS to individuals with household incomes between 100 percent and 400 percent of the poverty line. These subsidies are meant to prevent anyone from being in the position where the out-of-pocket cost of health insurance would be greater than 8% of his or her income.

Petitioners in David King et al. v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell et al., case number 14-114, four individuals who live in Virginia, argued that they did not wish to purchase health insurance, which would have cost over 8% of their annual income. These individuals challenged the IRS rule that would have provided them subsidies, arguing that the federal exchange operating in Virginia does not qualify as "an Exchange established by the State" under section 36B of the ACA, and that therefore they should not receive tax credits. A decision in their favor would have therefore exempted them from maintaining health insurance.

Court Analysis

The case ultimately focused on just six words of Section 36B of the ACA, which stipulates that for those people who cannot afford health coverage, subsidies are available through "an exchange established by the state." The court's decision turns on whether individuals who are enrolled in health insurance through the Federal exchange qualified for tax credits.

Notably, the court decided that the Chevron two-step analytical framework was not appropriate in this case. Chevron deference requires courts to defer to interpretations of statutes made by those government agencies charged with enforcing them, unless such interpretations are unreasonable, and is typically applied when the Court is analyzing an agency's interpretation of an ambiguous statute. In this case, however, Justice Roberts decisively wrote that the tax credits are one of the Act's key reforms and whether they are available on Federal Exchanges is a question of such "deep economic and political significance . . .[that] had Congress wished to assign that question to an agency, it surely would have done so expressly."

The Court instead determined that it was its task to determine the correct reading of the statute. After first determining that the text is ambiguous, the Court looked "to the broader structure of the Act." It is the court's analysis of the language establishing tax credits, read within the Act's context and structure, that lead to the Court's conclusion "that Section 36B allows tax credits for insurance purchased on any Exchange created under the Act. Those credits are necessary for the Federal Exchanges to function like their State Exchange counterparts, and to avoid the type of calamitous result that Congress plainly meant to avoid."

Justice Scalia authored the scathing dissent – writing "who would ever have dreamt that "Exchange established by the State" means "Exchange established by the State or the Federal Government"? Emphasizing the definition of "State," and noting that the Secretary of Health and Human Services is decidedly not one, Justice Scalia decries the majority opinion as "pure applesauce" and the logic behind the ruling as "interpretive jiggery-pokery." Claiming that, under the majority opinion, "words no longer have meaning," Justice Scalia writes that the majority "rewrites the law to make tax credits available everywhere. We should start calling this law SCOTUScare." Justice Scalia was joined in his dissent by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr.


1 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC, 467 U.S. 837 (1984)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions