United States: Medicaid Managed Care Proposed Rule Expands Federal Role In Rate Setting At Both The Managed Care Organization And Provider Level

On June 1, 2015, the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published its proposed rule on Medicaid managed care (CMS-2390-P). According to CMS, the purpose of the proposed rule is to "modernize the Medicaid managed care regulations to reflect changes in the usage of managed care delivery systems." Among the many changes to the program, CMS has proposed new rules regarding rate-setting.

This advisory, the second in a series of advisories on provisions in the proposed rule, will examine the new provisions related to rate-setting for Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs).  Specifically, this advisory will address the development of actuarial soundness standards, a proposed prohibition on States directing expenditures by MCOs, and the addition of medical loss ratio (MLR) standards for MCOs. CMS notes that the "overarching goal" of the proposed changes is to "reach the appropriate balance of regulation and transparency that accommodates the federal interests as payer and regulator, the state interests as payer and contracting entity, the actuary's interest ... and the overarching programmatic goals of promoting beneficiary access to quality care, efficient expenditure of funds ... and innovation in the delivery of care."1

Growth in Medicaid Managed Care

July 30, 2015 will mark the 50th anniversary of the creation of the Medicare and Medicaid programs. For much of its history, the Medicaid program operated nearly exclusively on a fee-for-service (FFS) basis and Medicaid recipients were guaranteed "freedom of choice" of providers. However, as managed care in the commercial market spread, Medicaid gradually experienced a similar trend. When Arizona adopted the Medicaid program as the last state to do so in 1982, the State sought and received approval to operate its entire Medicaid program using MCOs under a Section 1115 Demonstration Project. Other states, such as Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, subsequently received permission to use Medicaid managed care in urban areas. Managed care waivers increased throughout the 1990s under the authority of Section 1915(b) of the Social Security Act (allowing waivers relating to freedom of choice) and the Section 1115 demonstrations. When the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) was created in 1997, States were given greater flexibility in benefit design and service delivery, and many States opted to use MCOs exclusively for children. About 55 million people—more than 70 percent of Medicaid enrollees—now receive benefits through some type of managed care arrangement. Payments for managed care now account for 25-30 percent of all Medicaid benefit spending.

States, therefore, have been setting managed care capitation rates for more than 25 years. How States develop rates and negotiate contracts would change significantly under the proposed rules.

Actuarial Soundness

Actuarial soundness has long been the touchstone for determining the reasonableness of rates paid by States to MCOs. The existing Medicaid managed care regulations, set forth at 42 C.F.R. § 438.6(c)(1)(i)(C), define actuarially sound capitation rates as rates that:

  1. have been developed in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles and practices;
  2. are appropriate for the populations to be covered and the services to be furnished under the contract; and
  3. have been certified by an actuary who meets the qualification standards established by the American Academy of Actuaries and follows the practice standards established by the Actuarial Standards Board.

In March 2015, the Actuarial Standards Board formally adopted Medicaid Managed Care Capitation Rate Development and Certification, Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 49, which states that Medicaid capitation rates are "actuarially sound" if "for business for which the certification is being prepared and for the period covered by the certification, projected capitation rates and other revenue sources provide for all reasonable, appropriate, and attainable costs."2 The American Academy of Actuaries' Medicaid Rate Certification Work Group, in a practice note included with Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 49, noted that:

There is no federal regulatory requirement that rates be actuarially sound for a particular MCO ... An MCO reasonably could decide to accept rates for a particular year, knowing that it expects an underwriting loss in that year. Such a decision may be a reasonable business decision, given that the MCO is entering a new market or expects underwriting gains to emerge in the future (emphasis added).3

CMS proposes to revise the accepted definitions of actuarial soundness, establishing new standards for States and their actuaries, by adding a new section to the existing regulation. In general, CMS proposes to define actuarial sound capitation rates as "rates that are projected to provide for all reasonable, appropriate, and attainable costs under the terms of the contract and for the time period and population covered under the contract." 42 C.F.R. § 438.4(a). CMS specifically proposes eight standards/requirements, set forth in 42 C.F.R. § 438.4(b)(1)-(8), that MCO capitation rates must meet and that CMS will apply in its review and approval of capitation rates.

Most significantly, and contrary to prior practice, CMS proposes that the capitation rates "[b]e specific to payments for each rate cell under the contract. Payments from any rate cell must not cross-subsidize or be cross-subsidized by payments for any other rate cell." See proposed 42 C.F.R. § 438.4(b)(4). This new requirement would be a significant departure from prior practice, where States have often implicitly cross-subsidized certain populations through MCO rates.

The greater specificity and transparency in the proposed rules may be welcomed by the health plans, since greater information at the rate cell level should reduce uncertainty. States, however, are likely to raise significant concerns about diminished flexibility.

Prohibition on Direct Expenditures and Supplemental Payments

Current federal Medicaid managed care regulations prohibit payments by a State "to a provider other than the MCO ... for services available under the contract between the state and the MCO ...." 42 C.F.R. § 438.60. In order to allow continuation of programs of supplemental payments established under FFS and to implement other State priorities, many States have developed "MCO pass-through payments," where the State directs that a portion of the capitation payment paid to a MCO be distributed to a certain category of provider or for certain State purposes.  For example, California makes increased payment to Medi-Cal managed care plans to enable supplemental payments to private hospitals, designated public hospitals, and non-designated public hospitals paid for through California's Health Quality Assurance Fee, which imposes a fee on California's general acute care hospitals.

In the proposed rule, CMS recommends adding new language that would strictly limit States' existing flexibility to direct MCO expenditures under a risk contract. All contract arrangements that direct MCO, Prepaid Inpatient Health Plan (PIHP), or Prepaid Ambulatory Health Plan (PAHP) expenditures would require written approval from CMS prior to implementation. In order to obtain written approval, a State must demonstrate, among other things, that such a contract arrangement "directs expenditures equally, and using the same terms of performance, for all public and private providers providing the service under the contract."  This provision may prove exceptionally problematic, particularly in States that have existing "pass through payments" that implement State priorities.

Medical Loss Ratio

In the proposed rule, CMS proposes that beginning January 1, 2017, each MCO, PIHP, and PAHP would calculate and report a Medical loss ratio (MLR). The proposed rule provides great detail as to how the MLR is to be calculated, including the expenditures to be counted and omitted. Although it suggests that a MLR of 85 percent or greater be achieved, this is not required. See proposed 42 C.F.R. §§ 438.4(b)(8) and 438.8(c). Notably, there is no enforcement mechanism against the State nor an individual health plan for failure to achieve an MLR of 85 percent or greater. See proposed 42 C.F.R. § 438.8(j).

In the preamble to the proposed rule, CMS explains that it believes "... there are four benefits to a common national standard for the calculation, reporting and use of MLR as we have proposed: (1) It will provide greater transparency for the use of Medicaid funding; (2) it will allow comparability across states and facilitate better rate setting; (3) it will facilitate better comparisons to MLRs in MA and the private health market; and (4) it will reduce the administrative burden on health plans by providing a consistent approach to ensuring financial accountability for managed care plans working in multiple product lines and/or operating in multiple states."

It is true that plans must meet MLR standards in other contexts. However, health plans are likely to argue that Medicaid enrollees—even the non-elderly, non-disabled Medicaid populations that arguably have similar utilization patterns to those covered by private health insurance—need greater levels of care management than the general population, and those costs may not be fully captured in a MLR ratio. As a particularly extreme example, adding long-term services and supports (LTSS) into managed care truly makes Medicaid managed care incomparable to Medicare Advantage or private coverage because many of the LTSS benefits are more accurately social services rather than medical services. Home and community based services, such as supported employment, fall outside any current definition of "medically necessary" and have no parallel outside of Medicaid.

Significantly, while CMS believes MLR is a valuable tool, it has not proposed to make MLR enforceable in the Medicaid managed care context. In the preamble, CMS is clear that, "[t]hese changes, however, do not require that states assess any financial penalties on MCOs, PIHPs, and PAHPs that do not meet a minimum MLR." CMS recognizes that realistically, "... as states are already permitted to implement a minimum MLR or similar standards and some choose not to do so, we believe this rule is unlikely to encourage more states to do so and therefore unlikely to have any direct financial impact on Medicaid expenditures ...".

Summary

In general, the proposed changes could have far reaching financial impacts on health plans, providers, service vendors, and State budgets. The many and various State partners need to know how these new rules will change the regulatory environment that has been relatively stable for more than a decade.

Health plans, providers, service vendors, the States, and other interested parties will have the opportunity to comment on CMS' comprehensive proposal. To be assured consideration, comments are due to CMS no later than 5 p.m. on July 27, 2015.

Footnotes

1. Given these interests, it is noteworthy that shortly after the proposed rule was published, CMS also released its Draft 2016 Medicaid Managed Care Rate Development Guide, which will impact States, health plans, and providers. http://medicaid.gov/medicaid-chip-program-information/by-topics/delivery-systems/managed-care/downloads/draft-2016-managed-care-rate-guidance.pdf.

2. Medicaid Managed Care Capitation Rate Development and Certification, Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 49, at p. 2 (available at http://www.actuary.org/files/Actuarial_Soundness_Special_Report_5.10.12.pdf).

3. Id. at p. 9.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
30 Jan 2019, Other, Chicago, United States

Please join us on January 30, 2019, for the Fifth Annual Courageous Counsel Leadership Institute. This year's theme is "Risk and reward: Creating a culture that promotes innovation, change and growth.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions