United States: South Carolina Administrative Law Court Interprets Income-Producing Activity Method To Source Receipts Via Market

On May 12, 2015, the South Carolina Administrative Law Court (ALC) rejected a taxpayer's attempt to source subscription receipts from South Carolina customers outside of South Carolina based upon a cost of performance methodology. The ALC concluded that the taxpayer's income-producing activity was the delivery of a signal to the customer's home. Therefore, all of the subscription receipts from South Carolina customers were sourced to the numerator of the gross receipts ratio.1


The taxpayer, DIRECTV, is a multistate business that offers direct broadcast satellite video services to customers. DIRECTV earns the bulk of its revenues through subscription fees and the lease and sale of set-top boxes to customers.2 With respect to its subscription fees, DIRECTV originally filed its 2006-2008 South Carolina corporate tax returns sourcing all of its South Carolina customer subscription receipts to South Carolina. DIRECTV later amended these corporate tax returns to source all of the South Carolina subscription receipts outside of the state. DIRECTV asserted that South Carolina sales of services were sourced under a pro-rata cost of performance methodology claiming that all income-producing activity for the South Carolina sales occurred outside of the state. After review, the Department denied DIRECTV's amended returns and accepted the originally filed returns. DIRECTV also filed its 2009-2011 South Carolina corporate tax returns using the same pro-rata cost of performance methodology to source subscription receipts. In 2009 and 2010, DIRECTV again asserted that all incomeproducing activity occurred outside South Carolina. In 2011, DIRECTV asserted that a small portion of its subscription fees should be sourced to South Carolina on the basis of a ratio of in-state to everywhere payroll. The Department denied the use of this sales sourcing methodology on the 2009-2011 returns and assessed additional tax, including penalties and interest.

Income-Producing Activity

South Carolina does not explicitly adopt market-based or cost-of-performance sourcing for services, but instead uses an income-producing activity approach.3 Historically, the income-producing activity approach has been viewed to be similar to the pro rata cost of performance method. South Carolina statutes provide that if the income-producing activity is performed partly within and partly outside South Carolina, sales are attributable to South Carolina to the extent the income-producing activity is performed within the state.4 Neither the South Carolina statutes nor any other guidance provide a definition of income-producing activity.

DIRECTV argued that its subscription revenue should be sourced utilizing the location of the payroll and assets used to generate the subscription content. This methodology was based on concepts that were presented in a 1987 case, Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Commission.5 In this case, the taxpayer unsuccessfully argued that the applicable statute at that time (S.C. Code Sec. Ann. 12-7-1190) prescribed one rule, the origin of payment rule, for all businesses that do not deal in tangible personal property. The South Carolina Supreme Court in Lockwood Greene ultimately ruled that the revenue received for providing engineering services should be based on a pro-rata "place of activity" or the amount of payroll and property utilized in the state to deliver the service, in part because the taxpayer's clients paid the taxpayer for the expertise and time of its employees. The ALC distinguished Lockwood Greene from the case at hand, noting that DIRECTV customers did not pay for or hire distinct professionals for their expertise or time.

DIRECTV argued that its income-producing activities could be identified using four value drivers including content and programming, acquisition and distribution of the content to customers, marketing and sale of service, and customer service. However, the ALC found that DIRECTV failed to quantify these income-producing activities and also failed to identify how they determined the location where these activities occurred. Based upon the South Carolina Supreme Court's recent decision in CarMax, DIRECTV had the burden of proof for providing evidence to demonstrate that the income-producing activity occurred outside of South Carolina, but was unsuccessful in doing so.6

The ALC ruled that DIRECTV's income-producing activity was the delivery of the signal into the homes and the conversion of the signal via a DIRECTV box. This led to the conclusion that all of the income-producing activity related to the South Carolina customers occurred in South Carolina, and DIRECTV must source all of the South Carolina customer subscription revenue to South Carolina. The ALC concluded that there is no single methodology to determine income-producing activity for all service industries and did not impose a one-rule "place of activity" test for all taxpayers. The ALC simply agreed that the Department's use of different methods for different industries and taxpayers was appropriate. As a result, DIRECTV was assessed $6,646,168 in tax and license fees, plus an additional $653,425 in interest, and $1,661,541 in penalties imposed on the underpayment resulting from a substantial understatement of tax liability.

In its findings, the ALC clearly agreed with the Department's position that receipts are to be apportioned to South Carolina to the extent that the income-producing activity occurs within the state, rejecting the pure cost of performance approach the taxpayer attempted to apply. The area of focus was more on what the definition of the income-producing activity was for this industry and where the activity occurred. Further, the ALC indicated that DIRECTV did not provide enough evidence to define its income-producing activities and did not quantify how much income-producing activity occurred in any other state. Specifically, the ALC indicated that DIRECTV did not provide adequate information on how to apportion the subscription revenue between states in which it believed incomeproducing activities occurred.


It should be noted that this case reflects potential apportionment opportunities and/or risks that may exist for taxpayers classified as service providers. Taxpayers with more complex service offerings should evaluate their current sourcing methodology used for calculating the South Carolina gross receipts factor. Specifically, South Carolina sales sourcing methods should be evaluated for service providers whose income-producing activity (property and payroll) is not always in the same location as the customer receiving the benefit. Additionally, this case confirms that the Department may be applying more of an ad hoc market-based sourcing approach to some industries and taxpayers providing services, even under the cloak of the income-producing activity method. This case will likely be appealed and should be followed to see how the South Carolina courts ultimately interpret this issue. Additionally, in light of other significant alternative apportionment cases in South Carolina (including CarMax and Media General7), taxpayers will have to wait and see if the South Carolina legislature chooses to resolve some of the uncertainty surrounding these apportionment issues via legislative action.


1 DIRECTV Inc. & Subsidiaries v. S.C. Dept. of Revenue, South Carolina Administrative Law Court, Docket No. 14-ALJ-17-0158-CC, May 12, 2015.

2 The ALC summarily determined (and agreed with the taxpayer and the Department) that receipts received from South Carolina customers with respect to the lease and sale of set-top boxes should be sourced to South Carolina.

3 S.C. CODE ANN. § 12-6-2320(A).

4 S.C. CODE ANN. § 12-6-2295.

5 Lockwood Greene Engineers Inc. v. S.C. Tax Commission, 361 S.E. 2d 346 (Ct. App. 1987).

6 CarMax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 767 S.E.2d 195 (S.C. 2014). In CarMax, it was determined that the party seeking an alternative apportionment methodology bears the burden of proving that its alternative methodology more accurately reflects the business activity in South Carolina.

7 Media General Communications, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue, 694 S.E.2d 525 (S.C. 2010).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions