ARTICLE
29 May 2015

U.S. Loses WTO Appeal In Meat-Label Row

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
Last week, the World Trade Organization ("WTO") rejected a U.S. appeal over USDA's controversial country-of-origin meat labeling ("COOL") requirements that Canadian and Mexican producers have been fighting since 2008.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

Last week, the World Trade Organization ("WTO") rejected a U.S. appeal over USDA's controversial country-of-origin meat labeling ("COOL") requirements that Canadian and Mexican producers have been fighting since 2008. The COOL rule was an effort to help consumers make informed choices by requiring producers to label beef, pork, chicken, and other meat products to reveal where animals were born. WTO found the requirements in the final rule, issued in May 2013, violate global trade rules, specifically discriminating against Canadian and Mexican producers. Although the Obama administration has defended the COOL rules, House Agriculture Chairperson K. Michael Conway (R-TX) introduced a bill to repeal the COOL rules in an effort to avoid retaliatory tariffs against the United States, such as those recently announced by the Canadian Agricultural Minister. Last Wednesday, the House panel voted 38–6 to repeal the COOL requirements.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More