United States: Supreme Court Jettisons Common Law Precedent In Product Liability Cases Back To 1985 In Coba V. Tricam

New decision by the Florida Supreme Court Eliminates Important Defense Protection in Cases Involving Inconsistent Verdicts

In Coba v. Tricam Indus., Inc., 40 Fla. L. Weekly S257a (Fla. May 14, 2015), the Florida Supreme Court eliminated an important common law protection for defendants in cases where defense counsel fails to contemporaneously object to an inconsistent jury verdict.

In Coba, Plaintiff sued the manufacturer of an aluminum ladder alleging strict products liability for a defective design. The complaint also alleged the manufacturer was negligent in failing to design the ladder in a reasonably safe condition. At the conclusion of the evidence, the trial court authored a verdict form for the jury to use in deliberations. The form unwisely asked the strict liability question without any reference to strict liability terminology. It then placed the design defect question in advance of the question of negligence. The following is the Coba jury's verdict form entries:

The jury returned a verdict for $1.5m and the court discharged the jury with no objection from defense counsel. The manufacturer subsequently filed a motion to set aside the verdict as inconsistent. The motion argued there could be no finding of negligent design without a finding that a design defect contributed to the accident.

The Third Florida District Court of Appeal agreed and determined the inconsistency was of a "fundamental nature" such that the failure to contemporaneously object did not result in waiver. The appellate court reasoned that, regardless of the existence of a timely objection, it could not reconcile the jury's conclusion that there was no design defect but that the manufacturer was liable on a negligence claim predicated exclusively on design defect. The Third DCA then resolved the inconsistency in favor of the defense rather than remanding the case for a new trial. The court reasoned that plaintiff had only put on evidence of a design defect as the basis for the products liability claim. Thus, the jury's failure to find a design defect meant "there was no evidence to support any other cause of action [and] no issue to be resolved on remand."

The Supreme Court overturned the Third DCA and held that any objection to an inconsistent verdict is waived if not made before the jury is discharged. The Supreme Court determined that a "fundamental nature" exception to this rule in products liability cases is "at odds with the [....] policy reasons undergirding the requirement of timely objection, including upholding the sanctity of the jury's role in trial, preventing strategic gamesmanship, and increasing judicial efficiency." In doing so, the Supreme Court jettisoned common law precedent in products liability cases dating back to 1985.

In part, the Supreme Court based the ruling on a desire to prevent the defense from "strategically sitting on the objection until after the jury is no longer available to correct its decision." The court ignored however, the strategic practice by which plaintiffs' counsel artfully draft confusing verdict forms to maximize the chance of a favorable decision despite having tried inconsistent theories. Such tactics are common in Florida products liability trials where plaintiffs' counsel wager the defense will not to recognize the problem in the harried minutes between verdict announcement and jury discharge in order to timely object.

The announcement of a civil jury verdict is the culmination of months (and sometimes years) of litigation work. Trial is a lengthy process at the end of which, the attorneys and their clients are spent. Trial is inconvenient to the personal lives of the jurors and when verdict is announced, there is a powerful momentum to terminate their service and quickly return them to their real lives. Any defense lawyer who, on the last day of trial, delays the conclusion of the significant sacrifice endured by the jury clearly risks their substantial indignation.

Prior to Coba, the case law starkly demonstrates how difficult it may be to rapidly analyze the presence of an inconsistency in a jury verdict under such circumstances. There is a strong disincentive for defense counsel to make the eleventh hour demand as trial culmination that the jury be returned to the deliberation room to sit idle while the matter of an inconsistent verdict is analyzed and debated with an annoyed judge. And, what is the reward for defense counsel being correct in this regard? The Supreme Court mandates in Coba that the jury return to deliberations apparently on new instructions. Surely the plaintiff, whose chances of final victory were vastly improved with the initial verdict announcement, will demand that the jury's damages calculation must likewise be reopened during the new deliberations.

The following are some new considerations for defense counsel in light of Coba:

  • Defense counsel must be very cautious about the Florida standard verdict forms especially where altered by plaintiff or the judge. Considering the forms are litigated at a point in the trial where counsel can be more cool and deliberative, the defense attorney must be thorough in evaluating and formulating verdict forms and liberal with record objections to any problems.  
  • Defense counsel must be mindful of the potential for inconsistences while drafting and finalizing verdict forms and jury instructions. Typically, the defense wants detailed verdict forms to guide the jury in truly considering all the elements of every claim raised by plaintiff. But, complicated verdict forms can confuse and increase the possibility of an internal inconsistency. The risks and rewards of these competing issues must be carefully considered.  
  • Once the verdict form and jury instructions are finalized with the court, defense counsel must consider all the ways in which the verdict could come back inconsistent. Defense counsel must plan ahead for the defense reaction at the announcement of the verdict. After Coba, the defense attorney must anticipate possible inconsistencies no matter how theoretical, research the applicable standard, and be prepared to interpose are argue timely objections before jurors are discharged.  
  • Efforts must be made to avoid the scenario whereby a jury enters deliberations likely to culminate at close of business or at 6:00 p.m. on Friday night. Failing such efforts, defense counsel must, at the point the verdict is announced, obtain a side bar with the judge and opposing counsel to obtain a moment to consider any verdict inconsistency before the jury is discharged.  
  • If the jury is discharged without objection, there is still the possibility of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict ("JNOV").   
  • Before the jury ever receives the case, it is now a standard practice in Florida for defense counsel to move for directed verdict arguing that plaintiff's evidence was insufficient for jury deliberations. 
    • Before the jury ever receives the case, it is now a standard practice in Florida for defense counsel to move for directed verdict arguing that plaintiff's evidence was insufficient for jury deliberations. 
    • If defense counsel identifies a verdict inconsistency after jury discharge, he should consider whether it demonstrates an absence of evidence to support the portion of the verdict that favored the plaintiff over the portion that favored the defense.  
    • In such a scenario, the proper procedure is a motion for JNOV pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.480(b) and based on the earlier motion for directed verdict.1 A motion for JNOV is appropriate when "no view of the evidence could support a verdict for [plaintiff] and [thus,] no reasonable jury could render a verdict for that party. New Jerusalem Church of God, Inc. v. Sneads Cmty. Church, Inc., 147 So. 3d 25, 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Even Coba recognized that the defendant's failure to contemporaneously object to an inconsistent verdict will not permit entry of judgment pursuant to that verdict where there is no evidence to support one jury verdict finding over another.


1. Although the term "motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict" is still employed, pursuant to Rule 1.480(b), a motion challenging a jury verdict is more properly styled a "motion for judgment in accordance with a prior motion for directed verdict." See Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. v. Sealey, 810 So.2d 988, 991 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.