United States: "Hollywood Circuit" Court Issues En Banc Decision In Garcia V. Google: No Copyright Protection For Fleeting Dramatic Performance

Last Updated: May 19 2015
Article by David A. Kluft

On May 18, 2015, the Ninth Circuit sitting en banc vacated its prior decision in Garcia v. Google. The prior decision, authored by Judge Alex Kozinksi, controversially held that an actress had standing to issue a DMCA takedown notice to YouTube because she had a distinct copyright in her performance within a film, even though she was not an author of the film as a whole. The en banc decision dissolves a previously issued injunction and reaffirms a more traditional view of film authorship for copyright purposes.

Background

Cindy Lee Garcia agreed to act in a low budget film called "Desert Warrior," for which she was paid $500. The film she signed up for was never made, but the footage was repurposed into the now-infamous "Innocence of Muslims" trailer, in which Garcia's lines were redubbed so that she appeared to be asking, "Is your Mohammed a child molester?"  When the trailer appeared on YouTube (owned by Google), Garcia became the subject of death threats and even a fatwa. She sued the filmmakers for fraud and, when YouTube refused to comply with her DMCA takedown notices, she also sued YouTube for copyright infringement.

The District Court rejected Garcia's request for an injunction against YouTube on the grounds that, by Garcia's own admission, she was not an author or co-author of the film, and therefore had no legitimate copyright interest in it.  But on February 26, 2014, in an opinion authored by Judge Kozinksi, a divided panel of the Ninth Circuit held that Garcia indeed had a protectable copyright interest in her 5-second performance in the trailer, and that she was entitled to injunctive relief.

It seemed that most copyright experts — including the Copyright Office itself — disagreed with the decision, and many — including yours truly — howled at the blogosphere for en banc review. For us howlers, this new Ninth Circuit opinion, authored by Judge Margaret McKeown, restored some order.

Copyright Cherry Picking: The Ninth Circuit En Banc Majority

The en banc majority rejected Garcia's copyright claim for two reasons. First, she was not an author in the copyright sense. Although copyright law grants joint ownership to works made up of contributions by more than one author to a unitary whole, here Garcia had disclaimed any authorship in the film itself. Rather, she was advancing the novel theory that her five-second performance was protected by a separate copyright. That theory, the majority held, relies on an overly broad definition of copyright authorship, especially in the context of the film industry. This "copyright cherry picking" would enable any contributor from a "costume designer down to an extra or best boy to claim copyright in random bits and pieces of a unitary motion picture without satisfying the requirements of the Copyright Act." Moreover, as a practical matter, the Court believed that such fractured ownership would grind the film industry to a crawl with disputes over "complex, difficult-to-access and often phantom chain of title to tens, hundreds or even thousands of standalone copyrights."

Second, to merit copyright protection, a work must be "fixed in a tangible medium of expression," and that fixation must be done "by or under the authority of the author."  Here, the only fixation of Garcia's performance was in the film, a work she claims she did not ultimately authorize and to which she disclaims any authorship. Therefore, Garcia was unable to meet the fixation requirement.

Finally, the majority held that Garcia had not made a showing of irreparable harm, because the physical danger she hoped to remedy by an injunction did not stem from her alleged legal interests in a copyrighted work. In other words, the copyright interest itself was not being harmed and therefore the alleged "harms are untethered from – and incompatible with – copyright and copyright's function as an engine of expression."

Lack of Causal Connection: Judge Watford's Concurrence

Judge Paul Watford concurred, opining that Garcia had failed to prove irreparable harm for an additional reason: she had made no showing that removal of the video from YouTube would stop the death threats or dissolve the fatwa, which was issued because of "her role in making the film, not because the film is available on YouTube." Thus, there was no "causal connection" between the injury she faced and the conduct she sought to enjoin. Judge Watford concluded that, given the lack of irreparable harm, it was inappropriate and unnecessary for the majority to reach any substantive copyright law issues.

Alien Yogurt Revisited: Judge Kozinkski's Dissent

Judge Kozinksi's dissent accused the majority of making a "total mess of copyright law, right here in the Hollywood Circuit." Judge Kozinski further declared: "I won't be a party to it."  The majority in turn described Judge Kozinski's opinion as "substituting moral outrage and colorful language for legal analysis."

The dissent's main substantive argument was that Garcia's performance met each element necessary for copyright protection (it was original, it was in a fixed form, etc...), so that ended the matter.  Judge Kozinksi characterized the majority view as denying protection to Garcia's performance merely because it was created during the production of a later-assembled film, and argued that this view has "daunting" implications:

If Garcia's scene is not a work, then every take of every scene of, say, Lord of the Rings is not a work, and thus not protected by copyright, unless and until the clips become part of the final movie. If some dastardly crew member were to run off with a copy of the Battle of Morannon, the dastard would be free to display it for profit until it was made part of the final movie. And, of course, the take-outs, the alternative scenes, the special effects never used, all of those things would be fair game because none of these things would be "works" under the majority's definition. And what about a draft chapter of a novel? Is there no copyright in the draft chapter unless it gets included in the published book? Or if part of the draft gets included, is there no copyright in the rest of it?

Judge Kozinksi reinforced this argument by citing to his own opinion in Effects Associates, Inc. v. Cohen, about which we have previously written. In that case, the plaintiff special effects studio created footage of "alien yogurt" to be incorporated into the defendant's film, The Stuff. The parties got into an dispute over the bill, but the defendant used the footage anyway. The case was decided on the grounds of implied license, but was predicated on the assumption that the special effects studio held or retained copyright in the effects footage.  Thus, Judge Kozinski queried:

Why then are the seven shots "featuring great gobs of alien yogurt oozing out of a defunct factory" . . . any more a "standalone work" than Garcia's performance?

The answer to Judge Kozinski's interesting question is buried unceremoniously in a footnote in the majority opinion. The alien yogurt footage was a standalone work because it was independently created in full and independently fixed by what was not disputed to be a single authorial unit – the special effects studio. Only after that was it sent to the defendant and combined with other contributions to create The Stuff. Garcia's performance, by contrast, never existed as a standalone and independently fixed work before it was blended with the work of others. Even if one were to view the footage of Garcia's scene as a separate fixed work, Garcia was not the sole author of that work. Rather, her acting contribution was inextricably combined with the contributions of the rest of the cast and crew as it was fixed. Put another way, unless the alien yogurt itself was the one asserting copyright in the special effects footage, the cases are not analogous.

This may be the end of the line for Garcia's attempts to take down the video, but we've thought that several times before. Garcia still has the right to seek a rehearing (within 14 days) and/or to file a petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States.

To view Foley Hoag's Trademark and Copyright Law Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
13 Nov 2018, Webinar, Boston, United States

Social media platforms present countless opportunities for companies looking to connect to consumers and clients in real time.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McDermott Will & Emery
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McDermott Will & Emery
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions