ARTICLE
5 May 2015

High Court Will Need To Resolve Circuit Split In Fair Use

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
Despite a circuit split, the Supreme Court has once again passed on an opportunity to address the question of the appropriate framework for assessing the statutory factors used to evaluate "fair use" of a copyrighted work.
United States Intellectual Property

Despite a circuit split, the Supreme Court has once again passed on an opportunity to address the question of the appropriate framework for assessing the statutory factors used to evaluate "fair use" of a copyrighted work. On March 23, the Court denied a petition to review Kienitz v. Sconnie Nation, LLC, a Seventh Circuit decision holding that the adaption of a photograph of a political figure for a satirical t-shirt was fair use. Although the Court has touched on the fair use doctrine over the years in other contexts, it has not squarely addressed the standard for determining whether an unauthorized use is fair since its 1994 decision in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.

Originally published by Law360, April 30, 2015

Please click here to continue reading the full text/footnotes of this article

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More