United States: Discovery In Website-Based Suit Required To Determine Personal Jurisdiction

Richard Raysman is a Partner in our New York office

Incorporating ergonomics into the workplace, a term/ethos which broadly refers to the principles of "fitting a job to a person," is all the rage these days. Companies large and small, as well as some of their enterprising employees, are extolling the virtues of standing desks and enhanced lumbar support for those millions who spend at least 8 hours a day, 5 days a week fastened to a chair in their cubicle. Designs of ergonomic devices are considered intellectual property by the variety of businesses that provide services related to the optimization of such devices. Such designs, which encompass guides, layouts, images and manuals, recently became the subject of an intellectual property dispute in federal court in Michigan between two companies in the field. Humantech, Inc., v. Ergonomics Plus, Inc., No. 14-CV-12141, 2015 WL 1492224 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2015). However, the opinion issued discussed herein did not focus on the substantive arguments of the plaintiff, but rather on whether the case could be heard in a Michigan court against an Indiana company without offending Constitutional due process limits on personal jurisdiction.


Humantech, Inc. (Humantech) is a Michigan corporation that specializes in ergonomic "engineering, training, and consulting." Humantech owns significant intellectual property, including copyrights for guides, manuals, images, and surveys in the field of "ergonomic risk assessment and workplace improvement." Such materials are made available on Humantech's website. Likewise, Ergonomics Plus, Inc. (EP), an Indiana corporation, provides ergonomic consulting services.

This dispute arose when Humantech discovered that EP had posted blogs on its own website that included a "lifting guidelines calculator that was very similar in layout and appearance to" a similar calculator on Humantech's website. In a bit of technical savvy, Humantech averred in its complaint that the calculator posted on EP's website contained metadata identifying one of its employees that had aided in the creation of Humantech's calculator. Humantech also noted that in 2010, EP purchased one of its manuals that included a CD containing the calculator.

After negotiations to resolve the dispute failed, Humantech sued on grounds of copyright infringement, violations of the DMCA, and state trade secrets laws. EP filed a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) on the grounds that a court sitting in Michigan lacked personal jurisdiction over an Indiana corporation due to EP's insufficient contacts with Michigan.

Legal Analysis/Conclusions

The court engaged in a bifurcated but not mutually exclusive analysis of the exercise of personal jurisdiction over EP in Michigan by evaluating both the state's long arm-statute (M.C.L. §§ 600.711, 600,715) and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  See Beydoun v. Wataniya Restaurants Holding, Q.S.C., 768 F.3d 499 (6th Cir. 2014) (personal jurisdiction analysis with regard to M.C.L. § 600.715 and the Due Process Clause has not merged).

With respect to the long-arm statute, it concluded that it retained jurisdiction over EP because the statute had "uniformly been interpreted to cast an extremely wide net." Specifically, personal jurisdiction is valid pursuant to this statute when a party conducts "the slightest act of business in Michigan." Accordingly, since EP had purchased property from Humantech in Michigan, and Humantech alleged a tort action against it that precipitated an adverse economic effect in Michigan, the court had limited personal jurisdiction over EP under M.C.L. § 600.715.

Whether personal jurisdiction was permissible under the Due Process Clause was considered a closer question. As a structural framework for the analysis that followed, the court limited its discussion to the issue of specific jurisdiction, that is, jurisdiction over a defendant's activity in the forum state that is related to the suit itself.  See Walden v. Fiore, --- U.S. ----, 134 S. Ct. 1115 (2014) (detailed discussion of the law underlying this concept). Specific jurisdiction requires that the defendant have minimum contacts with the forum state in order for jurisdiction to be constitutional.

Michigan courts exist under the purview of the Sixth Circuit, and the latter court has formulated a three-part test to analysis whether sufficient minimum contacts exist: (1) the defendant must purposefully avail himself of the privilege of acting in the forum state or causing a consequence there, (2) the cause of action must arise from the defendant's activities in the forum state, and (3) the acts or consequences of the defendant must have a substantial enough connection with the forum state to make the exercise of jurisdiction reasonable.  S. Mach. Co. v. Mohasco, Indus., Inc., 401 F.2d 374 (6th Cir. 1968).

The Humantech court devoted the bulk of its analysis to the first prong; the "purposeful availment" prong.  Humantech advanced a trio of arguments as to why EP should be triable in Michigan. First, EP's website, which contains information about its services as well as the blog purportedly depicting Humantech's copyrighted lifting guidelines calculator, was accessible by Michigan residents. Second, EP had allegedly copied Humantech's IP and had purchased one of Humantech's products. Finally, EP had allegedly sold its products to Michigan customers.

These rationales were insufficient in and of itself to trigger personal jurisdiction. However, the court concluded that given the opacity of the record, jurisdictional discovery is required as a means of clarifying if EP did in fact purposefully avail itself of the privilege of acting in Michigan. See Murtech Energy Servs., LLC v. ComEnCo. Sys., Inc., 2014 WL 2863745 (E.D. Mich. June 24, 2014) (noting that one of three options for a court when facing a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) is to permit discovery). Specifically, the court concluded that the record was unclear as to the veracity of specific actions of EP that would be pertinent to the personal jurisdiction inquiry. For instance, the record did not specify whether EP had obtained the copied property through its purchase from Humantech in Michigan. In the same vein, the record did not illustrate the extent of EP's current business in Michigan, nor did it permit the court to assess whether EP had attempted to compete with Humantech in Michigan, which if true would evince targeting of the forum.

Therefore, Humantech's rationale in favor of personal jurisdiction was premised entirely on EP's website, and its interfacing with Michigan residents. Undoubtedly, EP was aware that its website reached individuals located in Michigan, and that use of its website would probably lead to purchases of its products to the harm of Humantech. However, the Supreme Court emphasized in Walden that "mere knowledge than an intentional tort [copyright infringement] directed at a plaintiff would lead to adverse effects in the forum state is not enough." EP's website must be targeted at the state itself and not only persons living in that state, and at this stage, the mere existence of the website and the knowledge of its owners that it may be used to implicate the owners in an intentional tort could not constitute sufficient targeting for the purposes of a personal jurisdiction analysis.

The court denied EP's motion to dismiss without prejudice. It ordered the parties to conduct limited discovery for a period no greater than 60 days. Following the completion of jurisdictional discovery, EP could renew the motion.

Ultimately, Humantech should probably be pleased with this ruling. Numerous precedents handed down from courts across the nation have rejected personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state entity when such jurisdiction is premised on the existence of a website that can be accessed by individuals in the forum state. And yet, Humantech apparently focused "extensively in its brief" on EP's website and its purported interaction with Michigan residents. It also focused on another jurisdiction case, Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783 (1984), but did not substantially discuss Walden, a case decided thirty years after Calder that significantly altered the context in which Calder would be viewed prospectively. Finally, motions to dismiss under the relevant Rule of Civil Procedure place the burden upon the plaintiff, and it's arguable that only satisfying one prong of the relevant test is insufficient to survive such a motion particularly for the party carrying the burden.

One then naturally wonders if Humantech actually has any significant evidence pertaining to the second and third prongs that could lead to a finding of personal jurisdiction. It seems likely that if they did, it would have been presented in the motion. Limited discovery was authorized for no more than sixty after the entry of the order.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions