United States: SEC Temporary Asset Freeze Not Barred By Automatic Stay Provisions

In an effort to protect the property of a bankruptcy estate, Section 362(a) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code imposes an automatic stay on most proceedings against a debtor in bankruptcy. The policy of this section is to grant relief to a debtor from creditors, and to prevent a "disorganized" dissipation of the debtor's assets. (See, e.g., U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brennan, 230 F.3d 65, 70 (2d Cir. 2000).) However, the scope of the automatic stay is not all-encompassing. For example, Section 362(b) provides several exceptions, including one for "the commencement or continuation of an action or proceeding by a governmental unit ... to enforce such governmental unit's ... police and regulatory power." This rather straightforward exception to the automatic stay is nevertheless qualified by a carve-out—often referred to as "the exception to the exception"—that maintains the automatic stay where such governmental police action occurs in connection with the enforcement of a money judgment. In Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wyly, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155382 (S.D.N.Y. 2014), the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York considered whether a temporary asset freeze sought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was excepted from the automatic stay as a governmental exercise of police powers, or whether such action was within the "exception to the exception" and thus barred by the automatic stay.

Wyly involved a civil enforcement action brought by the SEC against Sam Wyly and the estate of his late brother, Charles Wyly, arising from a fraudulent offshore securities scheme. In early October 2014, the SEC requested that the district court enter a pretrial order for a temporary asset freeze, financial discovery, and an accounting of the Wyly brothers' assets in order to preserve the SEC's ability to enforce a final judgment, which the SEC was pursuing but had yet to secure. Sam Wyly and Charles Wyly's estate representative, along with various other Wyly family members, opposed the SEC's request. Later that month, however, while the SEC's application to the district court was still pending, Sam Wyly filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas. Charles Wyly's widow and primary estate beneficiary filed a similar petition for relief four days later.

As a result of the bankruptcy filings, the Wylys claimed that the SEC was barred from freezing any assets belonging to the debtors' respective bankruptcy estates. The SEC disagreed, arguing that the two bankruptcy filings had no impact on its attempt to freeze the assets of the Wyly debtors. In resolving this dispute, the district court concluded that because the SEC was acting within its police and regulatory powers, the automatic stay did not apply to bar the freezing of the debtors' assets.

The district court supported its conclusion by distinguishing precedent established by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Brennan. There, the Second Circuit held that the SEC's attempt to repatriate a bankruptcy debtor's offshore trusts constituted an effort to enforce a money judgment, and was thus precluded by the automatic stay. The court of appeals reasoned that while the entry of a monetary judgment in favor of a governmental unit exercising its police or regulatory powers would not constitute a violation of the automatic stay, "anything beyond the mere entry of a money judgment against a debtor is prohibited by the automatic stay including steps preparatory to money collection." The appellate court explained that "the collection of a money judgment after entry is not authorized and requires a separate application to the bankruptcy court." Notably, the court of appeals drew a distinction between a governmental unit's exercise of police and regulatory powers on the one hand, and the governmental unit's enforcement of a money judgment on the other hand: "Up to the moment when liability is definitively fixed by entry of judgment, the government is acting in its police or regulatory capacity. However, once liability is fixed and a money judgment has been entered, the government necessarily acts only to vindicate its own interest in collecting its judgment."

In Wyly, the district court was presented with the SEC's request to impose a temporary asset freeze after a bankruptcy filing, but before the entry of a money judgment, a circumstance the district court considered an issue of first impression. Comparing the facts of Wyly to those of the Brennan case, the district court recognized that Brennan "explicitly drew the line at entry of judgment, and explained that all actions taken by the government 'up to the moment' when judgment is entered are actions within the government's police or regulatory capacity." Because the SEC was not yet seeking to enforce a money judgment—but instead was merely working to obtain such a judgment—the district court concluded that the SEC was acting within its police and regulatory capacity.

The district court also rejected the Wylys' argument that because the SEC was seeking to control property of the bankruptcy estates, the requested asset freeze fell within the Section 362(b)(4) "exception to the exception" and was therefore stayed. The district court held that "no asset here will be modified in any way" by the requested temporary asset freeze. Noting that the "SEC seeks to preserve the status quo in anticipation of a final judgment," the district court concluded that "preserving assets in anticipation of a judgment is not equivalent to controlling those assets in an effort to enforce a judgment already entered." As a result, the district court granted the SEC's request and imposed a temporary freeze on the Wylys' assets.

Importantly, the district court departed from the traditional analysis applied by courts when determining whether government action is an exercise of police or regulatory power or is more appropriately characterized as a judgment collection effort. This traditional analysis considers (1) whether the government is pursuing a matter of public safety or welfare rather than its pecuniary interest (the pecuniary purpose test), and (2) whether the government action is designed to effectuate public policy rather than to adjudicate private rights (the public policy test). (See Berg v. Good Samaritan Hospital (In re Berg), 230 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2000).) Because the SEC had not yet obtained a final judgment against the Wylys, the district court had no reason to reach this analysis. Instead, the district court concluded that the absence of a money judgment rendered the government's pretrial enforcement conduct within its police and regulatory capacity.

The district court in Wyly considered the scope of the "exception to the exception" in the unique circumstances where pre-judgment government action would directly affect assets of a debtor's bankruptcy estate. While this particular question presented the district court with an issue of apparent first impression, the ultimate holding is consistent with other cases that have considered similar scenarios. (See, e.g., SEC v. First Financial Group of Texas, 645 F.2d 429, 438 (5th Cir. 1981), holding that pretrial appointment of receiver was excepted from the automatic stay where "it [was] likely that, in the absence of a receiver to maintain the status quo, the corporate assets will be subject to diversion and waste.") Of course, had the SEC first obtained a final judgment against the Wylys and then sought to freeze the Wylys' assets in furtherance of such judgment, it is likely that the district court would have found the government's conduct to fall squarely within the "exception to the exception" and thus to be prohibited by the automatic stay.

Originally published by the Legal Intelligencer

Rudolph J. Di Massa, Jr., a partner at Duane Morris, is a member of the Business Reorganization and Financial Restructuring. He concentrates his practice in the areas of commercial litigation and creditors' rights. Jarret P. Hitchings is an associate in the firm's Wilmington, Delaware office and practices in the area of business reorganization and financial restructuring.

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions