Last month, in Roach v. T.L. Cannon Corp., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed a district court's order that denied certification of a class of restaurant employees alleging labor-law violations. Roach is an important decision for class-action lawyers who practice in the Second Circuit, as it held that classes may (sometimes) be certified even if the assessment of damages will require individualized, person-by-person fact-finding. But perhaps as significant as Roach's holding was a single, easy-to-miss sentence in its standard-of-review paragraph: "We review a district court's class certification determination for abuse of discretion, applying a 'noticeably less deferential' standard when the district court has denied class certification."
To continue reading Jonah Knobler's article from the New York Law Journal, please click here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.