United States: Comparing The Innovation Act And The STRONG Patents Act: Competing Proposals For Patent Reform

2015 could be a pivotal year for U.S. patent reform, with two significant — and very distinct — patent reform bills pending before Congress. This article compares the two bills, the Innovation Act and the STRONG Patents Act, the forces behind the bills, and the next steps in the U.S. patent reform debate.

Introduced in February 2015 by Rep. Bob Goodlatte as a measure to "curb abusive patent litigation," the Innovation Act picks up where the America Invents Act of 2011 (AIA) left off by proposing additional reforms to patent litigation procedures. The Innovation Act would also streamline some of the AIA's mechanisms for challenging patents.

In March 2015, Senator Christopher Coons and others introduced the STRONG Patents Act as a way to "reduce abuse while sustaining American leadership in innovation," The STRONG Patents Act includes some reforms that are similar to those of the Innovation Act, along with several other sections that are designed to protect the positions of patent holders.

Significant provisions of each bill include:

More detail in patent infringement complaints:

The Innovation Act would eliminate the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure's current model patent infringement complaint form. Instead, the bill will require that all complaints identify (i) the claims infringed, (ii) the accused product or process, and (iii) a description of how each limitation of each claim is met by the accused products or process.

The STRONG Patents Act also calls for elimination of the current model patent infringement complaint form. However, this bill does not require any specific replacement, nor does it propose any heightened standard for pleading.

(Notably, elimination of the FRCP's current model patent infringement form is expected to to occur by December 2015 even if neither patent reform bill passes.)

Attorneys fees to the prevailing party in patent litigation:

Currently, a prevailing party in patent infringement litigation may recover attorneys' fees only in exceptional cases. In the 2014 case of Octane Fitness LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, the Supreme Court relaxed this standard and gave district courts additional discretion for determining when a case can be considered "exceptional."

The Innovation Act will upend this standard by awarding fees to the prevailing party absent special circumstances, or if the losing party's positions were reasonably justified. In addition, the Innovation Act states that in certain situations a plaintiff who unilaterally extends a settlement offer with a covenant not to sue will be deemed a non-prevailing party. If the non-prevailing party cannot pay the fees, the prevailing party can seek the fees from the non-prevailing party's parent, investors or other "interested parties."

The STRONG Patents Act takes the opposite approach and instead proposes to codify the Octane Fitness standard.

Discovery limits:

The Innovation Act would limit the scope of discovery early in a patent infringement case. Until claim construction is over, then discovery would be limited to information necessary for the court to determine the meanings of various claim terms. This change would prohibit plaintiffs from seeking discovery on damages, and defendants from seeking certain information relating to validity, until the claims have been construed.

The STRONG Patents Act does not address this issue.

Bad faith patent notice letters :

The two bills take different approaches to the issue of frivolous and vague patent infringement notice letters.

The Innovation Act would limit the damages that a sender of such a letter can obtain in a patent suit. Currently, a plaintiff can seek heightened damages for willful infringement if the defendant had notice of the patent. A notice letter from the patent holder can serve as proof of such notice. The Innovation Act would only permit a notice letter to be used for damage calculation if the letter identify the patent holder's ultimate parent company, the accused product or process, and how the product or process infringes the patent.

The STRONG Patents Act states that the sending of patent notice letters in bad faith is an unfair or deceptive trade practice under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act. The FTC would have authority to pursue enforcement actions against entities who send such letters in bad faith.

Divided infringement:

In a 2014 opinion (Limelight Technologies, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.,), the Supreme Court ruled that a defendant can be liable for induced infringement of a patented method only if a single entity directly infringed the patent by performing all of the method's steps.

The STRONG Patents Act proposes to override the Limelight decision and eliminate any "single-entity" rule for induced or contributory infringement.

The Innovation Act proposes no changes to the current standards for divided infringement.

Transparency of ownership:

The Innovation Act will require patent infringement plaintiffs to identify all parties who have a right to sublicense or enforce the patent, each entity with a financial interest in the patent or in the plaintiff, and the ultimate parent of each of the identified entities.

The STRONG Patents Act does not address this in the context of litigation. Instead, it turns the tables and permits discovery of the real party in interest of the petitioner in PGR and IPR proceedings.

Limits on suing both manufacturer and customer:

Under the Innovation Act, if a patent infringement case is pending against a manufacturer of a product and a second case is then subsequently filed against the manufacturer's customer, then the court must grant a stay in the case against the customer if the customer agrees to be bound by the result of the case against the manufacturer.

The STRONG Patents Act contains no corresponding provision.

Changes to post-issuance proceedings:

A February 2015 Federal Circuit decision stated that the PTAB's claim construction standard in inter partes review (IPR) of granted patents should be the "broadest reasonable interpretation" standard. This differs from the standard used when a district court construes claims, which is to give claims the meaning as understood by a person of ordinary skill in the field of the invention.

Both the Innovation Act and the STRONG Patents Act propose to give post-grant review (PGR) and IPR proceedings the "ordinary meaning" standard, effectively overturning the recent Federal Circuit decision. The STRONG Patents Act would go even further to preserve patent rights by stating that patents should be given a "presumption of validity" in PGR and IPR proceedings.

The STRONG Patents Act also proposes to change IPR rules to expressly permit patent owners to amend claims. (Under current rules, amendments are possible but rare and difficult.)

The STRONG Patents Act also attempts to harmonize treatment of pending pre-AIA reexamination proceedings with that of IPR and PGR proceedings.

Double patenting:

The Innovation Act would clarify the standard currently used (but not described in law or regulation) for the issuance of double patenting rejections in patent applications filed by the same inventor.

The STRONG Patents Act does not address double patenting.

Fee shifting:

The STRONG Patents Act proposes to eliminate the diversion of USPTO fees to other projects by establishing a new "Innovation Promotion Fund" that only the USPTO can use.

The Innovation Act does not address USPTO fee diversion.

Micro entity status:

The America Invents Act established a reduced fee structure for patent applicants who meet certain criteria for "micro entity" status. Micro entities include individuals who are below certain income thresholds, applicants who are employed by an institution of higher education, and applicants who have licensed or assigned the invention to institutions of higher educations. However, institutions of higher education themselves were notably absent from the criteria for micro entity status.

The STRONG Patents Act proposes to add institutions of higher education to the list of entities that qualify for micro entity status. The Innovation Act does not address this issue.

Next steps

Both the Innovation Act and the STRONG Patents Act have bipartisan support, but they have different goals and different industry groups advocating their passage. The Innovation Act has been supported by the Consumer Electronics Association, the American Council on Education, and a host of other trade organizations and private companies. The STRONG Patents Act has been supported by the Biotechnology Industry Association (BIO), the National Venture Capital Association, the Association of American Universities, and the Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities, and several private technology companies who have formed an advocacy group called the Innovation Alliance.

The competing bills set the stage for a very public debate on the direction of patent reform for the upcoming year.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions