United States: The Trust Indenture Act’s New Relevance To Out-Of-Court Restructurings

Two recent decisions of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Marblegate Asset Mgmt., et al. v. Education Mgmt. Corp., et al.1 and Meehancombs Global Credit Opportunities Fund, L.P. et al. v. Caesars Entertainment Corp., et al.,2 raise new hurdles for out-of-court restructurings of notes qualified under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (the "TIA") where the obligor fails to obtain the consent of all holders of such debt. In both those cases, the court gave an expansive reading of section 316(b) of the TIA3 , indicating that the elimination of parent company guarantees and amendment of covenants designed to insure that the obligor would have assets from which to pay the debt in the future, constituted an impairment of the nonconsenting noteholders' rights to receive payment of principal and interest on their notes in violation of TIA section 316(b) and in breach of the indenture covenants mandated by that section.4

Education Management Corporation ("EDMC") and its affiliates facing financial distress pursued an out-of-court restructuring (and not a bankruptcy filing) because EDMC and its affiliated entities would lose their eligibility for education funding from the federal government under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 if they were to file for bankruptcy or have an order for relief filed against them. In the Education Management case, the restructuring involved both secured debt and unsecured notes issued by Education Management LLC (the "Notes"). The Notes indenture was guaranteed by the obligor's parent, EDMC, and had a covenant that if the secured lenders were to release a guarantor of the secured debt from its guarantee then that guarantor's guarantee of the Notes would be automatically released. While there was no guarantee of the secured debt when the Notes were issued, a guarantee by the parent company was added to the secured debt as part of restructuring negotiations with the secured lenders earlier in 2014. This addition made it possible for the indenture covenant providing for automatic release of a guarantee to apply upon the release of such guarantee by the secured lenders. As part of the Restructuring Support Agreement ("RSA") signed by the secured lenders and holders of a majority in principal amount of the Notes, if the obligor did not obtain consent of 100% of the Noteholders to the terms of the restructuring, the signatories to the RSA would be obligated to effect an "Intercompany Sale". In connection with the Intercompany Sale, the secured lenders would release the obligor's parent from its guarantee of the secured loans (resulting in a release of the parent company's guarantee of the Notes), the secured lenders would exercise their rights under their 2014 Credit Agreement and Article 9 of the UCC to foreclose on substantially all of the assets of the obligor and other defendants and the secured lenders would immediately sell those assets back to a new subsidiary of EDMC, which would distribute debt and equity to creditors who had consented to the restructuring.

The nonconsenting Noteholders sought a preliminary injunction of the out-of-court restructuring, maintaining that the restructuring violated the nonconsenting holders' rights under TIA section 316(b). The Education Management court denied the nonconsenting Noteholders' request for injunctive relief because the Noteholders failed to prove, among other things, that they would be irreparably harmed, since if the nonconsenting Noteholders prevailed in their suit they would have the opportunity to collect monetary damages against the parent guarantor or whatever subsidiary the assets were conveyed to through the Intercompany Sale. However, the court, in dicta, in considering the other factors for issuing the injunction, including the likelihood of success on the merits, concluded that the Intercompany Sale likely violates the TIA. The court in reaching that conclusion considered the legislative history of TIA section 316(b) and determined that the section provides a broad protection against nonconsensual debt restructurings.5 The court observed that the record "[left] little question that the Intercompany Sale is precisely the type of debt reorganization that [section 316(b) of] the Trust Indenture Act is designed to preclude"6 because it would ensure that the dissenting Noteholders would not receive payment on account of their Notes. The court viewed the Intercompany Sale as operating "to effect a complete impairment of dissenters' right to receive payment."7 The court concluded that "the Trust Indenture Act simply does not allow the company to precipitate a debt reorganization outside the bankruptcy process to effectively eliminate the rights of nonconsenting bondholders."8 The case is a departure from prior decisions that interpreted TIA section 316(b) as requiring a payment default or change in payment terms before that section would come into play.

In the Caesars case, certain minority holders of two issues of notes ("CEOC Notes") issued by Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. ("CEOC") brought suit against CEOC and CEOC's parent, Caesars Entertainment Corporation ("CEC") (a guarantor of the CEOC Notes) seeking, among other things, to enforce their rights under TIA section 316(b) and section 6.8 and 508 respectively, of two CEOC unsecured note indentures, mandated by section 316(b). The complaint alleged that prior to the execution of supplemental indentures in August 2014 the CEOC Notes were guaranteed by CEC, the asset rich parent of CEOC. The complaint also asserted that the removal of the parent guarantees and the amendment of the indenture covenants precluding divestiture of assets to measure future asset sales based on CEOC's assets as of the date of the amendment in August 2014, constituted a breach of section 6.8 and 508 of the respective indentures and a violation of the TIA. The amendments, which effectively left CEC free to transfer CEOC's assets without any obligation to back CEOC's debt, were consented to by holders of a majority in principal amount of the CEOC Notes. The majority noteholders were contacted by CEOC and paid par plus accrued interest (a more than 100% premium over market) for the majority noteholders' debt in connection with the noteholders' promise to support the future restructuring of CEOC and their consent to the removal of the CEC guaranty and the modification of the covenant restricting disposition of CEOC's assets. The complaint alleged that the amendments facilitated CEC's plan to put CEOC into bankruptcy while protecting CEC's owners from CEOC's creditors. 9

The Caesars court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint and found that "the [c]omplaint's plausible allegations that the August 2014 Transaction stripped the plaintiffs of the valuable CEC [g]uarantees leaving them with an empty right to assert a payment default from an insolvent issuer"10 were sufficient to state a claim under TIA section 316(b). The court held that the removal of the CEC guarantees was "an impermissible out-of-court debt restructuring achieved through collective action" which "is exactly what TIA section 316(b) is designed to prevent."11 The court rejected defendants' arguments that the "no action" provision of the indentures (permitted by section 316(a) of the TIA) precluded the suit because no default in payment of principal of or interest on the CEOC Notes had occurred. The court also found no merit in defendants' argument that the language in section 316(b) and the corresponding mandated indenture provisions required an actual nonpayment of the CEOC Notes for the Noteholders to bring suit for breach of sections 6.8 and 508 of the indentures and the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. In fact, section 6.8 and 508 of the indentures lacked language contained in section 316(b) referring to "payment on or after... [the] respective [due] dates [for payment of principal and interest]." The court concluded that the removal of the CEC guarantee impaired the rights of the nonconsenting Noteholders to payment without their consent and was sufficient to defeat the motion to dismiss the complaint as to the claims under section 316(b) of the TIA and under state law for breach of section 6.8 and 508 of the respective indentures and the covenant of good faith and fair dealing against CEC.12

Potential Ramifications for Issuers and Noteholders

The Education Management and Caesars decisions provide new leverage for nonconsenting minority holders of public debt subject to the TIA in out-of-court restructurings. However, the decisions may prove in certain cases to be a double-edged sword because obligors who cannot obtain the consent of holders of 100% of their TIA debt may be forced to reorganize under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in order to achieve the same result with potentially less value left to pay noteholders. These decisions may also lead issuers in the future to avoid issuing notes in registered offerings or granting registrations rights that would cause the notes to be subject to the TIA. Moreover, it is likely that indenture trustees may require before entering into such supplemental indentures under similar circumstances receipt of an opinion of counsel to the obligor that the amendment does not violate section 316(b) of the TIA.


[1] 2014 U.S. Dist. Lexis 178707 (S.D.N.Y Dec. 30, 2014).

[2] 2015 U.S. Dist. Lexis 5111 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 15, 2015).

[3] 15 U.S.C. § 77ppp(b). TIA Section 316(b) provides in pertinent part "...the right of any holder of any indenture security to receive payment of principal of and interest on such indenture security, on or after the respective due dates...or to institute suit for the enforcement of such payment on or after such respective dates shall not be impared or affected without the consent of such holder...."

[4] Although the court's expansive reading of section 316(b) in Education Management was by way of dicta, it serves as a basis for the court's holding in Caesars.

[5] The court also followed the decision in Federated Strategic Income Fund v. Mechala Grp. Jam. Ltd., 1999 U.S. Dist. Lexis 16996 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 1999) which found that the TIA protects the ability, and not merely the formal right to receive payment.

[6] 2014 U.S. Dist. Lexis 178707 at *59.

[7] 2014 U.S. Dist. Lexis 178707 at *60.

[8] 2014 U.S. Dist. Lexis 178707 at *65.

[9] 2015 U.S. Dist. Lexis 5111 at *5.

[10] 2015 U.S. Dist. Lexis 5111 at *17.

[11] 2015 U.S. Dist. Lexis 5111 at *18.

[12] The court made no ruling with respect to CEOC because at the time of the court's decision the automatic stay applied to litigation against CEOC as the result of the then pending involuntary chapter 11 case against CEOC.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.